Optimal Strategies for Screening Common Birth Defects in Children of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1159/000541697
Umaima Zaki, Saqib Hamid Qazi, Urooj Shamim, Shibrah Fatima, Jai K Das, Zulfiqar A Bhutta
{"title":"Optimal Strategies for Screening Common Birth Defects in Children of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Umaima Zaki, Saqib Hamid Qazi, Urooj Shamim, Shibrah Fatima, Jai K Das, Zulfiqar A Bhutta","doi":"10.1159/000541697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Congenital anomalies are one of the major causes of the global burden of diseases, and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately affected. This review assesses the prenatal and postnatal screening methods and compares the prevalence of major congenital anomalies in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane databases of systematic reviews, clinical trials.gov for relevant studies using Medical Subject Headings and keywords. We categorized the studies into different systems and screening methods depending on the time the tests were conducted (prenatal or postnatal). The studies were then subjected to detailed descriptive analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 59 studies were selected for analysis; these focused on screening methods for congenital anomalies and compared their prevalence with regards to different systems. The most common screening techniques both prenatal and postnatal included antenatal ultrasound, fetal echocardiography, pulse oximetry, and clinical examination. The most common congenital abnormalities involved the central nervous system (neural tube defects) and musculoskeletal (clubfoot), followed by gastrointestinal (omphalocele and gastroschisis) and cardiovascular (structural heart defect). Overall, different systems had varying prevalences of different birth defects, ranging from 0.28 to 8.5%. In contrast, the prevalence of musculoskeletal system disorders varied from 1.01% to 3.96%, in the cardiovascular system from 0.57% to 10.4%, and in the urogenital group from 0.83% to 5.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review highlights the lack of screening programs and studies, especially in the primary and secondary care settings in LMICs, and limited studies do indicate a high burden of various congenital anomalies. There is a need for guidelines and programs in global maternal and child health programs to include timely screening and management of common birth defects in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Congenital anomalies are one of the major causes of the global burden of diseases, and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately affected. This review assesses the prenatal and postnatal screening methods and compares the prevalence of major congenital anomalies in LMICs.

Methodology: We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane databases of systematic reviews, clinical trials.gov for relevant studies using Medical Subject Headings and keywords. We categorized the studies into different systems and screening methods depending on the time the tests were conducted (prenatal or postnatal). The studies were then subjected to detailed descriptive analysis.

Results: A total of 59 studies were selected for analysis; these focused on screening methods for congenital anomalies and compared their prevalence with regards to different systems. The most common screening techniques both prenatal and postnatal included antenatal ultrasound, fetal echocardiography, pulse oximetry, and clinical examination. The most common congenital abnormalities involved the central nervous system (neural tube defects) and musculoskeletal (clubfoot), followed by gastrointestinal (omphalocele and gastroschisis) and cardiovascular (structural heart defect). Overall, different systems had varying prevalences of different birth defects, ranging from 0.28 to 8.5%. In contrast, the prevalence of musculoskeletal system disorders varied from 1.01% to 3.96%, in the cardiovascular system from 0.57% to 10.4%, and in the urogenital group from 0.83% to 5.9%.

Conclusion: The review highlights the lack of screening programs and studies, especially in the primary and secondary care settings in LMICs, and limited studies do indicate a high burden of various congenital anomalies. There is a need for guidelines and programs in global maternal and child health programs to include timely screening and management of common birth defects in LMICs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
筛查中低收入国家儿童常见出生缺陷的最佳策略:系统回顾。
导言:先天性畸形是造成全球疾病负担的主要原因之一,中低收入国家受到的影响尤为严重。本综述评估了产前和产后筛查方法,并比较了中低收入国家主要先天性畸形的患病率:我们使用医学主题词表和关键词在 MEDLINE/PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane 系统综述数据库、clinical trials.gov 中对相关研究进行了系统检索。我们根据检测时间(产前或产后)将研究分为不同的系统和筛查方法。然后对这些研究进行了详细的描述性分析:结果:共选取了 59 项研究进行分析;这些研究侧重于先天性畸形的筛查方法,并比较了不同系统的筛查率。产前和产后最常见的筛查技术包括产前超声波、胎儿超声心动图、脉搏血氧仪和临床检查。最常见的先天畸形涉及中枢神经系统(神经管缺陷)和肌肉骨骼(马蹄内翻足),其次是胃肠道(脐膨出和胃畸形)和心血管系统(结构性心脏缺陷)。总体而言,不同系统的出生缺陷发生率各不相同,从 0.28%到 8.5%不等。相比之下,肌肉骨骼系统疾病的发病率从 1.01% 到 3.96%不等,心血管系统疾病的发病率从 0.57% 到 10.4%不等,泌尿生殖系统疾病的发病率从 0.83% 到 5.9%不等:综述强调了筛查计划和研究的缺乏,尤其是在低收入国家的初级和二级医疗机构,而有限的研究确实表明各种先天性畸形的负担很重。有必要在全球妇幼保健计划中制定指导方针和方案,以便及时筛查和处理低收入和中等收入国家的常见出生缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Care of Preterm and Term Newborns with Respiratory Conditions: A Systematic Synthesis of Evidence from Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Intravenous Dextrose for the Treatment of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: A Systematic Review. Post-Asphyxial Aftercare and Management of Neonates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Evidence Synthesis. Immediate Care for Common Conditions in Term and Preterm Neonates: The Evidence. Prevention and Treatment of Neonatal Infections in Facility and Community Settings of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Descriptive Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1