Poor adherence to proper Barrett's esophagus screening and surveillance guidelines in patients with newly diagnosed esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Q3 Medicine Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Pub Date : 2024-09-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08998280.2024.2397936
Phi Tran, Anupama Ancha, Matthew Tjahja, Mark Shell, Christopher Naumann
{"title":"Poor adherence to proper Barrett's esophagus screening and surveillance guidelines in patients with newly diagnosed esophageal adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Phi Tran, Anupama Ancha, Matthew Tjahja, Mark Shell, Christopher Naumann","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2024.2397936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE) remains controversial, even for high-risk populations. Our study aimed to evaluate the proportion of patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) who were not screened for BE or did not receive recommended BE surveillance screening. We then evaluated the relationship between cancer staging and screening/surveillance opportunities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included 187 patients from January 2016 to January 2022 with newly diagnosed EAC. Data extracted from patient charts included BE risk factors, and BE, endoscopic, and histologic history.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 187 patients had a new diagnosis of EAC. Among this group, 44% had appropriate BE surveillance adherence, and 47% of patients met the criteria for BE screening but had not been screened prior to EAC diagnosis. Adherence to BE surveillance was associated with earlier stages of cancer on biopsy. No significant difference in cancer staging was found in those with missed BE screening opportunities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients with a diagnosis of BE who adhered to surveillance guidelines had earlier stage EAC at diagnosis, which emphasizes the importance of surveillance. Most of those with an initial diagnosis of EAC had not received any BE screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"37 6","pages":"922-926"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2024.2397936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE) remains controversial, even for high-risk populations. Our study aimed to evaluate the proportion of patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) who were not screened for BE or did not receive recommended BE surveillance screening. We then evaluated the relationship between cancer staging and screening/surveillance opportunities.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 187 patients from January 2016 to January 2022 with newly diagnosed EAC. Data extracted from patient charts included BE risk factors, and BE, endoscopic, and histologic history.

Results: A total of 187 patients had a new diagnosis of EAC. Among this group, 44% had appropriate BE surveillance adherence, and 47% of patients met the criteria for BE screening but had not been screened prior to EAC diagnosis. Adherence to BE surveillance was associated with earlier stages of cancer on biopsy. No significant difference in cancer staging was found in those with missed BE screening opportunities.

Discussion: Patients with a diagnosis of BE who adhered to surveillance guidelines had earlier stage EAC at diagnosis, which emphasizes the importance of surveillance. Most of those with an initial diagnosis of EAC had not received any BE screening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新确诊食管腺癌患者对正确的巴雷特食管筛查和监测指南遵守不力。
背景:巴雷特食管(BE)筛查仍存在争议,即使是对高危人群也是如此。我们的研究旨在评估确诊为食管腺癌(EAC)的患者中未接受食管癌筛查或未接受建议的食管癌监测筛查的比例。然后,我们评估了癌症分期与筛查/监测机会之间的关系:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月期间新确诊的 187 例 EAC 患者。从患者病历中提取的数据包括BE风险因素、BE、内镜和组织学病史:共有187名患者被新诊断为EAC。在这组患者中,44%的患者坚持了适当的BE监测,47%的患者符合BE筛查标准,但在确诊EAC之前未接受过筛查。坚持BE监测与活检癌症分期较早有关。错过BE筛查机会的患者在癌症分期方面没有明显差异:讨论:诊断为BE的患者如果遵守监测指南,其EAC诊断分期较早,这强调了监测的重要性。在最初诊断为EAC的患者中,大多数未接受过任何BE筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
期刊最新文献
The importance of screening and surveillance: Barrett's esophagus and esophageal cancer. A brief descriptive analysis of a pilot study of peer support training and supervision for Texas firefighters. Contrast-associated acute kidney injury: How can we do better? "In a word, partnership"-lessons from a student-led health fair. A review of professionalism in surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1