XBB.1.5-Adapted COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines but Not Infections With Previous Omicron Variants Boost Neutralisation Against the SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 Variant in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1111/apt.18349
Simon Woelfel, Joel Dütschler, Daniel Junker, Marius König, Nicole Graf, Claudia Krieger, Samuel Truniger, Vasileios Oikonomou, Georg Leinenkugel, Seraina Koller, Katline Metzger-Peter, Jacqueline Wyss, Niklas Krupka, Nicola Frei, Werner C Albrich, Matthias Friedrich, Jan Hendrik Niess, Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra, Alex Dulovic, Benjamin Misselwitz, Wolfgang Korte, Justus J Bürgi, Stephan Brand
{"title":"XBB.1.5-Adapted COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines but Not Infections With Previous Omicron Variants Boost Neutralisation Against the SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 Variant in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.","authors":"Simon Woelfel, Joel Dütschler, Daniel Junker, Marius König, Nicole Graf, Claudia Krieger, Samuel Truniger, Vasileios Oikonomou, Georg Leinenkugel, Seraina Koller, Katline Metzger-Peter, Jacqueline Wyss, Niklas Krupka, Nicola Frei, Werner C Albrich, Matthias Friedrich, Jan Hendrik Niess, Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra, Alex Dulovic, Benjamin Misselwitz, Wolfgang Korte, Justus J Bürgi, Stephan Brand","doi":"10.1111/apt.18349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, many patients rely on pre-existing immunity by original vaccines or prior infections.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess whether such immunity sufficiently combats the highly immune-evasive SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 variant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilising two longitudinal cohorts, we evaluated immunity against JN.1 induced by original vaccines (IBD: n = 98; healthy: n = 48), omicron breakthrough infection (IBD: n = 55; healthy: n = 57) or XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines (IBD: n = 18). Neutralisation and anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG levels against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and JN.1 were assessed using multiplex immunoassays. Study outcomes were wild-type and JN.1 neutralisation following three doses of original mRNA vaccines, stratified by immunosuppressive therapy (primary outcome), and JN.1 neutralisation following third-dose breakthrough infection or a fourth dose of XBB.1.5-adapted mRNA vaccines (secondary outcomes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following original vaccines, JN.1 neutralisation was lower than wild-type neutralisation in all study groups (healthy, anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF; each p < 0.001); most individuals lacked JN.1 neutralisation (healthy: 97.9%; anti-TNF: 98.3% and non-anti-TNF: 92.3%). Confounder-adjusted multivariable modelling strongly associated anti-TNF therapy with low levels of anti-JN.1-RBD IgG (fold-change 0.48 [95% CI 0.39-0.59]). JN.1 neutralisation was similar in patients with or without breakthrough infection (anti-TNF, non-anti-TNF; each p > 0.05); neutralisation failure was 100% despite breakthrough infection. XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines enhanced JN.1 neutralisation (p < 0.001) and reduced neutralisation failure rates in patients with IBD (94.4% pre-vaccination vs. 44.4% post-vaccination; p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only variant-adapted vaccines protect against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Patients with IBD and healthy individuals without recent vaccination may lack protection against the JN.1 subvariant KP.3 which causes current COVID-19 surges.</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18349","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, many patients rely on pre-existing immunity by original vaccines or prior infections.

Aim: To assess whether such immunity sufficiently combats the highly immune-evasive SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 variant.

Methods: Utilising two longitudinal cohorts, we evaluated immunity against JN.1 induced by original vaccines (IBD: n = 98; healthy: n = 48), omicron breakthrough infection (IBD: n = 55; healthy: n = 57) or XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines (IBD: n = 18). Neutralisation and anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG levels against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and JN.1 were assessed using multiplex immunoassays. Study outcomes were wild-type and JN.1 neutralisation following three doses of original mRNA vaccines, stratified by immunosuppressive therapy (primary outcome), and JN.1 neutralisation following third-dose breakthrough infection or a fourth dose of XBB.1.5-adapted mRNA vaccines (secondary outcomes).

Results: Following original vaccines, JN.1 neutralisation was lower than wild-type neutralisation in all study groups (healthy, anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF; each p < 0.001); most individuals lacked JN.1 neutralisation (healthy: 97.9%; anti-TNF: 98.3% and non-anti-TNF: 92.3%). Confounder-adjusted multivariable modelling strongly associated anti-TNF therapy with low levels of anti-JN.1-RBD IgG (fold-change 0.48 [95% CI 0.39-0.59]). JN.1 neutralisation was similar in patients with or without breakthrough infection (anti-TNF, non-anti-TNF; each p > 0.05); neutralisation failure was 100% despite breakthrough infection. XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines enhanced JN.1 neutralisation (p < 0.001) and reduced neutralisation failure rates in patients with IBD (94.4% pre-vaccination vs. 44.4% post-vaccination; p = 0.003).

Conclusions: Only variant-adapted vaccines protect against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Patients with IBD and healthy individuals without recent vaccination may lack protection against the JN.1 subvariant KP.3 which causes current COVID-19 surges.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
XBB.1.5适配的COVID-19 mRNA疫苗能增强炎症性肠病患者对SARS-CoV-2 JN.1变异株的中和作用,而以前的Omicron变异株疫苗则不能。
背景:建议炎症性肠病(IBD)患者接种变异适应型 COVID-19 疫苗。目的:评估这种免疫力是否足以对抗具有高度免疫侵袭性的 SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 变异株:利用两个纵向队列,我们评估了原始疫苗(IBD:n = 98;健康:n = 48)、奥米克隆突破感染(IBD:n = 55;健康:n = 57)或 XBB.1.5 适应疫苗(IBD:n = 18)诱导的 JN.1 免疫力。使用多重免疫测定法评估了针对野生型 SARS-CoV-2 和 JN.1 的中和作用和抗受体结合域 (RBD) IgG 水平。研究结果为:接种三剂原始 mRNA 疫苗后的野生型和 JN.1 中和情况,按免疫抑制疗法进行分层(主要结果),以及接种第三剂突破性感染或第四剂 XBB.1.5 适应型 mRNA 疫苗后的 JN.1 中和情况(次要结果):结果:接种原始疫苗后,所有研究组(健康组、抗肿瘤坏死因子组和非抗肿瘤坏死因子组;均 p 0.05)的 JN.1 中和率均低于野生型中和率;尽管存在突破性感染,但中和失败率为 100%。XBB.1.5适配疫苗增强了JN.1的中和作用(p 结论):只有变异株适应疫苗才能抵御新出现的 SARS-CoV-2 变异株。肠道疾病患者和近期未接种疫苗的健康人可能缺乏对 JN.1 亚变异体 KP.3 的保护,而该变异体会导致目前 COVID-19 的激增。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
期刊最新文献
Letter: Towards Better Intervention Strategies for MASLD and MetALD—What Are We Missing? Authors' Reply Letter: Towards Better Intervention Strategies for MASLD and MetALD—What Are We Missing? Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Three Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Ulcerative Colitis: A Real‐World Multicentre Study in Japan Development and Validation of a PIVKA-II-Based Model for HCC Risk Stratification in Patients With HCV-Related Cirrhosis Successfully Treated With DAA Serum Ferritin Levels and Liver-Related Events in Individuals With Steatotic Liver Disease: A Longitudinal Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1