Impacts of Hospital Volume and Patient-Hospital Distances on Outcomes of Older Adults Receiving Percutaneous Microaxial Ventricular Assist Devices for Cardiogenic Shock.
Atsuyuki Watanabe, Yoshihisa Miyamoto, Hiroki Ueyama, Hiroshi Gotanda, Jacob C Jentzer, Navin K Kapur, Ulrich P Jorde, Yusuke Tsugawa, Toshiki Kuno
{"title":"Impacts of Hospital Volume and Patient-Hospital Distances on Outcomes of Older Adults Receiving Percutaneous Microaxial Ventricular Assist Devices for Cardiogenic Shock.","authors":"Atsuyuki Watanabe, Yoshihisa Miyamoto, Hiroki Ueyama, Hiroshi Gotanda, Jacob C Jentzer, Navin K Kapur, Ulrich P Jorde, Yusuke Tsugawa, Toshiki Kuno","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Percutaneous microaxial ventricular assist devices (pVAD) have the potential to reduce mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). However, the association between the distribution of pVAD-performing centers and outcomes of CS has not been explored. <b>Methods:</b> This observational study included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65-99 years treated with pVAD for CS from 2016 to 2020 and examined the associations between patient outcomes and two exposure variables: hospitals' procedure volumes of pVAD and patient-hospital distances (in quintiles [Qn]). We developed Cox proportional hazard regression for 180-day mortality and heart failure (HF) readmission rates and multivariable logistic regression for in-hospital outcomes, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, concomitant treatments, and hospital characteristics, including CS volume, teaching status, and the ability to perform extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. <b>Results:</b> A total of 6,637 patients with CS underwent pVAD at 1,041 hospitals, with the annualized hospital volume ranging widely from 0.3 to 55.6 cases/year. Patients treated at higher-volume centers experienced lower 180-day mortality compared with patients treated at lower-volume centers (Qn1=reference; Qn2: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.97; Qn3: aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98; Qn4: aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99; Qn5: aHR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95; p-for-trend, 0.026), while we found no evidence that patient-hospital distances were associated with mortality (Qn1=reference; Qn2: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-1.09; Qn3: aHR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85-1.04; Qn4: aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.92-1.11; Qn5: aHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.82-1.01; p-for-trend, 0.160). We found no evidence that the hospital volume and patient-hospital distances were associated with in-hospital bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, or renal replacement therapy initiation. <b>Conclusions:</b> Hospital volume was more strongly associated with mortality than patient-hospital distances, suggesting that rational distribution of pVAD-performing centers while ensuring adequate procedure volumes may optimize patient mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014738","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous microaxial ventricular assist devices (pVAD) have the potential to reduce mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). However, the association between the distribution of pVAD-performing centers and outcomes of CS has not been explored. Methods: This observational study included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65-99 years treated with pVAD for CS from 2016 to 2020 and examined the associations between patient outcomes and two exposure variables: hospitals' procedure volumes of pVAD and patient-hospital distances (in quintiles [Qn]). We developed Cox proportional hazard regression for 180-day mortality and heart failure (HF) readmission rates and multivariable logistic regression for in-hospital outcomes, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, concomitant treatments, and hospital characteristics, including CS volume, teaching status, and the ability to perform extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Results: A total of 6,637 patients with CS underwent pVAD at 1,041 hospitals, with the annualized hospital volume ranging widely from 0.3 to 55.6 cases/year. Patients treated at higher-volume centers experienced lower 180-day mortality compared with patients treated at lower-volume centers (Qn1=reference; Qn2: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.97; Qn3: aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98; Qn4: aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99; Qn5: aHR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95; p-for-trend, 0.026), while we found no evidence that patient-hospital distances were associated with mortality (Qn1=reference; Qn2: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-1.09; Qn3: aHR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85-1.04; Qn4: aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.92-1.11; Qn5: aHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.82-1.01; p-for-trend, 0.160). We found no evidence that the hospital volume and patient-hospital distances were associated with in-hospital bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, or renal replacement therapy initiation. Conclusions: Hospital volume was more strongly associated with mortality than patient-hospital distances, suggesting that rational distribution of pVAD-performing centers while ensuring adequate procedure volumes may optimize patient mortality.
期刊介绍:
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.