Early Versus Delayed Invasive Management of Female Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014763
Gregory B Mills, Christos P Kotanidis, Shamir Mehta, Denise Tiong, Erik A Badings, Thomas Engstrøm, Arnoud W J van 't Hof, Dan Høfsten, Lene Holmvang, Alexander Jobs, Lars Køber, Dejan Milasinovic, Aleksandra Milosevic, Goran Stankovic, Holger Thiele, Roxana Mehran, Vijay Kunadian
{"title":"Early Versus Delayed Invasive Management of Female Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Gregory B Mills, Christos P Kotanidis, Shamir Mehta, Denise Tiong, Erik A Badings, Thomas Engstrøm, Arnoud W J van 't Hof, Dan Høfsten, Lene Holmvang, Alexander Jobs, Lars Køber, Dejan Milasinovic, Aleksandra Milosevic, Goran Stankovic, Holger Thiele, Roxana Mehran, Vijay Kunadian","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Female patients are at greater risk of adverse events following non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome but less frequently receive guideline-recommended coronary angiography and revascularization. Routine invasive management benefits high-risk patients, but evidence informing the optimal timing of angiography specifically in female patients is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to November 2023. Randomized controlled trials investigating early versus delayed timing of coronary angiography in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome were included. Individual patient data from female patients were extracted. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction at 6 months. We performed a 1-stage individual patient data meta-analysis using random-effects Cox models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six trials contributed individual patient data from 2257 female patients. Median time to coronary angiography was 5 hours in the early invasive group (n=1141) and 49 hours in the delayed invasive group (n=1116). Overall, there was no significant reduction in the risk of the primary end point in the early invasive group compared with the delayed group (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.60-1.06]; <i>P</i>=0.12). Early invasive management was associated with a reduction in recurrent ischemia (hazard ratio, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.94]; <i>P</i>=0.025). In the prespecified subgroup analysis, high-risk female patients with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score >140 receiving early invasive management experienced a significantly reduced hazard for all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction at 6 months (hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.45-0.94]; <i>P</i>=0.021; <i>P</i><sub>interaction</sub>=0.035). Similar benefits were observed for female patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early invasive management in female patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome, compared with delayed invasive management, was not associated with a significant reduction in the hazard for the primary end point. In prespecified subgroup analysis, high-risk female patients as assessed with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score >140 or elevated cardiac biomarkers experienced significant reductions in all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction at 6 months following early invasive management.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42023468604.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e014763"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014763","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Female patients are at greater risk of adverse events following non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome but less frequently receive guideline-recommended coronary angiography and revascularization. Routine invasive management benefits high-risk patients, but evidence informing the optimal timing of angiography specifically in female patients is lacking.

Methods: Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to November 2023. Randomized controlled trials investigating early versus delayed timing of coronary angiography in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome were included. Individual patient data from female patients were extracted. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction at 6 months. We performed a 1-stage individual patient data meta-analysis using random-effects Cox models.

Results: Six trials contributed individual patient data from 2257 female patients. Median time to coronary angiography was 5 hours in the early invasive group (n=1141) and 49 hours in the delayed invasive group (n=1116). Overall, there was no significant reduction in the risk of the primary end point in the early invasive group compared with the delayed group (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.60-1.06]; P=0.12). Early invasive management was associated with a reduction in recurrent ischemia (hazard ratio, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.94]; P=0.025). In the prespecified subgroup analysis, high-risk female patients with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score >140 receiving early invasive management experienced a significantly reduced hazard for all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction at 6 months (hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.45-0.94]; P=0.021; Pinteraction=0.035). Similar benefits were observed for female patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers.

Conclusions: Early invasive management in female patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome, compared with delayed invasive management, was not associated with a significant reduction in the hazard for the primary end point. In prespecified subgroup analysis, high-risk female patients as assessed with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score >140 or elevated cardiac biomarkers experienced significant reductions in all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction at 6 months following early invasive management.

Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42023468604.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非st段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征女性患者的早期与延迟介入治疗:个体患者数据荟萃分析
背景:女性患者在非st段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征后发生不良事件的风险更高,但接受指南推荐的冠状动脉造影和血运重建术的频率较低。常规的侵入性管理有利于高危患者,但缺乏证据表明血管造影的最佳时机,特别是女性患者。方法:检索截至2023年11月的Medline、Web of Science和Scopus数据库。随机对照试验研究了非st段抬高急性冠脉综合征患者早期与延迟冠脉造影的时机。从女性患者中提取个体患者数据。主要终点是6个月时全因死亡率或心肌梗死的综合指标。我们使用随机效应Cox模型进行了一期个体患者数据荟萃分析。结果:6项试验提供了来自2257名女性患者的个体患者数据。早期有创组(n=1141)中位到冠状动脉造影时间为5小时,延迟有创组(n=1116)中位到冠状动脉造影时间为49小时。总体而言,与延迟侵入组相比,早期侵入组的主要终点风险没有显著降低(风险比,0.79 [95% CI, 0.60-1.06];P = 0.12)。早期有创治疗与减少再发缺血相关(风险比0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.94];P = 0.025)。在预先指定的亚组分析中,全球急性冠状动脉事件登记评分为bbbb140的高风险女性患者接受早期有创治疗后,6个月时全因死亡或心肌梗死的风险显著降低(风险比,0.65 [95% CI, 0.45-0.94];P = 0.021;Pinteraction = 0.035)。心脏生物标志物升高的女性患者也观察到类似的益处。结论:对女性非st段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征患者进行早期有创治疗,与延迟有创治疗相比,与主要终点危险的显著降低无关。在预先指定的亚组分析中,急性冠状动脉事件全球登记评分为bbbb140或心脏生物标志物升高的高风险女性患者在早期侵入性治疗后6个月的全因死亡率或心肌梗死显著降低。注册:网址:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/;唯一标识符:CRD42023468604。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
期刊最新文献
Prospective Validation of the MIRACLE2 Score for Early Neurological Stratification After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac-Arrest: The GLOBAL-MIRACLE Registry. Is Stable CAD the Same in All Circumstances? The Curious Case of PCI Before TAVR. Hospital-level Variability in NSTEMI Management: Findings from the NCDR Chest Pain-MI Registry. Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. DanGers of Delays in Cardiogenic Shock: Benefit Persists But Attenuates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1