Clinical findings of long-term ambulatory video EEG following routine EEG

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110104
Ewan S. Nurse , Dean R. Freestone , Gabriel Dabscheck , Mark J. Cook
{"title":"Clinical findings of long-term ambulatory video EEG following routine EEG","authors":"Ewan S. Nurse ,&nbsp;Dean R. Freestone ,&nbsp;Gabriel Dabscheck ,&nbsp;Mark J. Cook","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aims to assess the diagnostic yield of routine EEG (rEEG) followed by long-term ambulatory EEG (aEEG) in a retrospective cohort, focusing on the rates of abnormal EEG findings, and overall event capture.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were retrospectively collected from deidentified clinical reports of patients who underwent both rEEG and subsequent aEEG, with both modalities including video recordings. The study included 95 patients, with demographic, clinical information, and EEG findings extracted for analysis. Statistical analyses included chi-squared proportion tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to assess the influence of variables such as age, sex, referral source, and aEEG duration on outcomes. Bayes factors were calculated to evaluate the power of the statistical tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 95 patients, 33 % were 16 years old or younger. The median duration of aEEG was 3.9 days. Abnormal EEG findings increased from 18 % with rEEG to 33 % with aEEG. Epileptic seizures were captured in 3 % of rEEG and 8 % of aEEG, while non-epileptic events were captured in 35 % of aEEG compared to none in rEEG. Younger age was associated with higher rates of abnormal findings, but this was not adequately powered. Females had a higher likelihood of event capture on aEEG, though this finding was also underpowered. The majority of adult and paediatric patients with a normal rEEG went on to have a normal aEEG.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Ambulatory EEG significantly improves the diagnostic yield for both epileptic and non-epileptic events compared to routine EEG, particularly in adults. This study supports the broader use of aEEG for comprehensive epilepsy evaluation and suggests further research to optimise its clinical utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024004864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to assess the diagnostic yield of routine EEG (rEEG) followed by long-term ambulatory EEG (aEEG) in a retrospective cohort, focusing on the rates of abnormal EEG findings, and overall event capture.

Methods

Data were retrospectively collected from deidentified clinical reports of patients who underwent both rEEG and subsequent aEEG, with both modalities including video recordings. The study included 95 patients, with demographic, clinical information, and EEG findings extracted for analysis. Statistical analyses included chi-squared proportion tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to assess the influence of variables such as age, sex, referral source, and aEEG duration on outcomes. Bayes factors were calculated to evaluate the power of the statistical tests.

Results

Among the 95 patients, 33 % were 16 years old or younger. The median duration of aEEG was 3.9 days. Abnormal EEG findings increased from 18 % with rEEG to 33 % with aEEG. Epileptic seizures were captured in 3 % of rEEG and 8 % of aEEG, while non-epileptic events were captured in 35 % of aEEG compared to none in rEEG. Younger age was associated with higher rates of abnormal findings, but this was not adequately powered. Females had a higher likelihood of event capture on aEEG, though this finding was also underpowered. The majority of adult and paediatric patients with a normal rEEG went on to have a normal aEEG.

Conclusion

Ambulatory EEG significantly improves the diagnostic yield for both epileptic and non-epileptic events compared to routine EEG, particularly in adults. This study supports the broader use of aEEG for comprehensive epilepsy evaluation and suggests further research to optimise its clinical utility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规脑电图检查后长期动态视频脑电图检查的临床发现。
目的:本研究旨在通过回顾性队列评估常规脑电图(rEEG)和长期动态脑电图(aEEG)的诊断率,重点关注异常脑电图发现率和总体事件捕获率:从接受脑电图检查和后续脑电图检查的患者的去身份化临床报告中回顾性收集数据,两种检查方式均包括视频记录。该研究包括 95 名患者,提取了人口统计学、临床信息和脑电图结果进行分析。统计分析包括卡方比例检验和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验,以评估年龄、性别、转诊来源和 aEEG 持续时间等变量对结果的影响。计算贝叶斯系数以评估统计检验的功率:在 95 名患者中,33% 为 16 岁或以下。脑电图检查持续时间的中位数为 3.9 天。异常脑电图结果从 18% 的 rEEG 增加到 33%的 aEEG。3% 的脑电图和 8% 的脑电图记录到癫痫发作,35% 的脑电图记录到非癫痫事件,而脑电图则没有。年龄越小,异常发现率越高,但这项研究的研究对象并不充分。女性在 aEEG 上捕获事件的可能性更高,但这一结果也未得到充分验证。大多数rEEG正常的成人和儿科患者的aEEG也正常:结论:与常规脑电图相比,非卧床脑电图能明显提高癫痫和非癫痫事件的诊断率,尤其是在成人患者中。这项研究支持在癫痫综合评估中更广泛地使用动态脑电图,并建议开展进一步研究以优化其临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1