Greater Relative First and Second Lactate Thresholds in Females Compared With Males: Consideration for Exercise Prescription.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY International journal of sports physiology and performance Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1123/ijspp.2024-0079
José Antonio Benítez-Muñoz, Miguel Ángel Rojo-Tirado, Pedro José Benito Peinado, Juan M Murias, Domingo González-Lamuño, Rocío Cupeiro
{"title":"Greater Relative First and Second Lactate Thresholds in Females Compared With Males: Consideration for Exercise Prescription.","authors":"José Antonio Benítez-Muñoz, Miguel Ángel Rojo-Tirado, Pedro José Benito Peinado, Juan M Murias, Domingo González-Lamuño, Rocío Cupeiro","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2024-0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate differences between females and males at lactate thresholds 1 (LT1) and 2 (LT2).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four female and twenty male participants performed an incremental cycle-ergometer test until exhaustion, where LT1 and LT2 were determined in each volunteer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Power output at LT1 and LT2 was lower in females than in males (P < .001). In addition, power output relative to peak power was higher in females at LT1 and LT2 (P < .001). However, heart rate was higher in females than males at LT1 and LT2 (P = .008). Furthermore, the heart rate relative to maximal heart rate was higher in females compared with males at LT1 and LT2 (P = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Females and males may be in a different metabolic situation at the same percentage of maximum. This study helps to reduce sex bias in science, and future guidelines should consider establishing exercise prescription recommendations according to sex.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial: </strong>NCT06104150.</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate differences between females and males at lactate thresholds 1 (LT1) and 2 (LT2).

Methods: Twenty-four female and twenty male participants performed an incremental cycle-ergometer test until exhaustion, where LT1 and LT2 were determined in each volunteer.

Results: Power output at LT1 and LT2 was lower in females than in males (P < .001). In addition, power output relative to peak power was higher in females at LT1 and LT2 (P < .001). However, heart rate was higher in females than males at LT1 and LT2 (P = .008). Furthermore, the heart rate relative to maximal heart rate was higher in females compared with males at LT1 and LT2 (P = .002).

Conclusion: Females and males may be in a different metabolic situation at the same percentage of maximum. This study helps to reduce sex bias in science, and future guidelines should consider establishing exercise prescription recommendations according to sex.

Clinical trial: NCT06104150.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与男性相比,女性的相对第一和第二乳酸阈值更高:考虑运动处方。
目的:研究女性和男性在乳酸阈值 1(LT1)和 2(LT2)上的差异:24名女性和20名男性参加者进行了增量式循环测力计测试,直至力竭,并测定了每位志愿者的乳酸阈值1和乳酸阈值2:结果:女性在LT1和LT2时的功率输出低于男性(P < .001)。此外,相对于峰值功率,女性在 LT1 和 LT2 时的功率输出更高(P < .001)。然而,在 LT1 和 LT2 时,女性的心率高于男性(P = .008)。此外,相对于最大心率,女性在LT1和LT2时的心率高于男性(P = .002):女性和男性在相同的最大心率百分比下可能处于不同的新陈代谢状态。这项研究有助于减少科学中的性别偏见,未来的指南应考虑根据性别制定运动处方建议:临床试验:NCT06104150。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
199
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.
期刊最新文献
Manual Dexterity in Open-Water Wetsuited Swimmers: A Cohort Crossover Study. No Effect of Individualized Sodium Bicarbonate Supplementation on 200-m or 400-m Freestyle-Swimming Time-Trial Performance in Well-Trained Athletes. Comparing Differences and Relationships Between Traditional and Resisted Sprints in Elite Youth Rugby Backs and Forwards. Erratum. "Falling Behind," "Letting Go," and Being "Outsprinted" as Distinct Features of Pacing in Distance Running. An Educational Review on Machine Learning: A SWOT Analysis for Implementing Machine Learning Techniques in Football.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1