Prediction of Suicidal Thoughts and Suicide Attempts in People Who Gamble Based on Biological-Psychological-Social Variables: A Machine Learning Study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatric Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1007/s11126-024-10101-x
Mohsen Mohajeri, Negin Towsyfyan, Natalie Tayim, Bita Bazmi Faroji, Mohammadreza Davoudi
{"title":"Prediction of Suicidal Thoughts and Suicide Attempts in People Who Gamble Based on Biological-Psychological-Social Variables: A Machine Learning Study.","authors":"Mohsen Mohajeri, Negin Towsyfyan, Natalie Tayim, Bita Bazmi Faroji, Mohammadreza Davoudi","doi":"10.1007/s11126-024-10101-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent research has shown that people who gamble are more likely to have suicidal thoughts and attempts compared to the general population. Despite the advancements made, no study to date has predicted suicide risk factors in people who gamble using machine learning algorithms. Therefore, current study aimed to identify the most critical predictors of suicidal ideation and suicidal attempts among people who gamble using a machine learning approach. An online survey conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 741 people who gamble (mean age: 25.9 ± 5.56). To predict the risk of suicide attempts and ideation, we employed a comprehensive set of 40 biological, psychological, social, and socio-demographic variables. The predictive models were developed using Logistic Regression, Random Forest (RF), robust eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and ensemble machine learning algorithms. Data analysis was performed using R-Studio software. Random Forest emerged as the top-performing algorithm for predicting suicidal ideation, with an impressive AUC of 0.934, sensitivity of 0.7514, specificity of 0.9885, PPV of 0.9473, and NPV of 0.9347. Across all models, dissociation, depression, and anxiety symptoms consistently emerged as crucial predictors of suicidal ideation. However, for suicide attempt prediction, all models exhibited weaker performance. XGBoost showed the best performance in this regard, with an AUC of 0.663, sensitivity of 0.78, specificity of 0.8990, PPV of 0.34, NPV of 0.984, and accuracy of 0.8918. Depressive symptoms and rumination severity were highlighted as the most important predictors of suicide attempts according to this model. These findings have important implications for clinical practice and public health interventions. Machine learning could help detect individuals prone to suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among people who gamble, assisting in creating tailored prevention programs to address future suicide risks more effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":20658,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"711-730"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-024-10101-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research has shown that people who gamble are more likely to have suicidal thoughts and attempts compared to the general population. Despite the advancements made, no study to date has predicted suicide risk factors in people who gamble using machine learning algorithms. Therefore, current study aimed to identify the most critical predictors of suicidal ideation and suicidal attempts among people who gamble using a machine learning approach. An online survey conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 741 people who gamble (mean age: 25.9 ± 5.56). To predict the risk of suicide attempts and ideation, we employed a comprehensive set of 40 biological, psychological, social, and socio-demographic variables. The predictive models were developed using Logistic Regression, Random Forest (RF), robust eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and ensemble machine learning algorithms. Data analysis was performed using R-Studio software. Random Forest emerged as the top-performing algorithm for predicting suicidal ideation, with an impressive AUC of 0.934, sensitivity of 0.7514, specificity of 0.9885, PPV of 0.9473, and NPV of 0.9347. Across all models, dissociation, depression, and anxiety symptoms consistently emerged as crucial predictors of suicidal ideation. However, for suicide attempt prediction, all models exhibited weaker performance. XGBoost showed the best performance in this regard, with an AUC of 0.663, sensitivity of 0.78, specificity of 0.8990, PPV of 0.34, NPV of 0.984, and accuracy of 0.8918. Depressive symptoms and rumination severity were highlighted as the most important predictors of suicide attempts according to this model. These findings have important implications for clinical practice and public health interventions. Machine learning could help detect individuals prone to suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among people who gamble, assisting in creating tailored prevention programs to address future suicide risks more effectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于生物-心理-社会变量预测赌博者的自杀想法和自杀企图:机器学习研究
最新研究表明,与普通人相比,赌博者更容易产生自杀念头和企图自杀。尽管研究取得了进展,但迄今为止还没有研究利用机器学习算法预测赌博者的自杀风险因素。因此,本研究旨在利用机器学习方法找出赌博人群中最关键的自杀意念和自杀企图预测因素。一项在线调查对 741 名赌博者(平均年龄:25.9 ± 5.56)进行了横断面分析。为了预测企图自杀和意念自杀的风险,我们采用了一套包含 40 个生物、心理、社会和社会人口变量的综合模型。我们使用逻辑回归(Logistic Regression)、随机森林(Random Forest,RF)、鲁棒性梯度提升(robust eXtreme Gradient Boosting,XGBoost)和集合机器学习算法建立了预测模型。数据分析使用 R-Studio 软件进行。随机森林算法是预测自杀意念表现最好的算法,其 AUC 为 0.934,灵敏度为 0.7514,特异度为 0.9885,PPV 为 0.9473,NPV 为 0.9347,令人印象深刻。在所有模型中,解离、抑郁和焦虑症状始终是预测自杀意念的关键因素。但是,在自杀未遂预测方面,所有模型的表现都较弱。XGBoost 在这方面表现最佳,其 AUC 为 0.663,灵敏度为 0.78,特异度为 0.8990,PPV 为 0.34,NPV 为 0.984,准确度为 0.8918。根据该模型,抑郁症状和反刍严重程度是自杀未遂最重要的预测因素。这些发现对临床实践和公共卫生干预具有重要意义。机器学习可以帮助检测赌博人群中容易产生自杀意念和自杀企图的个体,从而帮助制定有针对性的预防计划,更有效地应对未来的自杀风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric Quarterly
Psychiatric Quarterly PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Quarterly publishes original research, theoretical papers, and review articles on the assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation of persons with psychiatric disabilities, with emphasis on care provided in public, community, and private institutional settings such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. Qualitative and quantitative studies concerning the social, clinical, administrative, legal, political, and ethical aspects of mental health care fall within the scope of the journal. Content areas include, but are not limited to, evidence-based practice in prevention, diagnosis, and management of psychiatric disorders; interface of psychiatry with primary and specialty medicine; disparities of access and outcomes in health care service delivery; and socio-cultural and cross-cultural aspects of mental health and wellness, including mental health literacy. 5 Year Impact Factor: 1.023 (2007) Section ''Psychiatry'': Rank 70 out of 82
期刊最新文献
Social Media Use, Emotional Investment, Self-Control Failure, and Addiction in Relation to Mental and Sleep Health in Hispanic University Emerging Adults. Barriers to Seeking Psychological Help among First-Year Medical Students: A Cross- Sectional Study from Turkey. Covid-19 Anxiety Scale (CAS): A Validity and Reliability Study. Evaluating the Link between Visual Attention Bias and Emotion Dysregulation of Young Children. The Bergen-Yale Sexual Addiction Scale (BYSAS): Longitudinal Measurement Invariance Across a Two-Year Interval.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1