Value of the central sensitisation inventory in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY RMD Open Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004528
Yvonne Maria van der Kraan, Davy Paap, Hans Timmerman, Freke Wink, Suzanne Arends, Michiel Reneman, Anneke Spoorenberg
{"title":"Value of the central sensitisation inventory in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.","authors":"Yvonne Maria van der Kraan, Davy Paap, Hans Timmerman, Freke Wink, Suzanne Arends, Michiel Reneman, Anneke Spoorenberg","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In many patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), pain persists despite anti-inflammatory medication. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) indirectly assesses altered somatosensory function, though its clinical practicality is limited. The Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI) could be an alternative in the initial assessment of central sensitisation (CS). This study aimed to investigate the value of the CSI in evaluating CS in patients with axSpA by (1) assessing somatosensory function related to CS with QST and (2) exploring associations between CSI, QST, patient and disease characteristics and pain-related psychosocial factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive outpatients from the Groningen Leeuwarden AxSpA cohort underwent QST, including pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Participants completed questionnaires assessing CS (CSI), illness perception (Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire, IPQ-R), pain-related worrying (Pain Catastrophising Scale, PCS), fatigue (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, MFIS), anxiety/depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS) and coping. QST measurements were stratified for CSI≥40.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>201 patients with axSpA were included; 63% male, 64% radiographic axSpA, median symptom duration 12 years (IQR 5-24), mean Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score 2.1±1.0. Patients with CSI≥40 had significantly lower PPTs and higher TS than CSI<40 (p<0.004). No significant differences in CPM were observed. In multivariable linear regression, sex, PCS, IPQ-R Identity, MFIS and HADS anxiety were independently associated with CSI (78% explained variance).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large cross-sectional study in patients with axSpA, the CSI appears as a useful initial CS assessment questionnaire. When CSI scores indicate CS, considering pain-related psychosocial factors is important. These results emphasise the need for a biopsychosocial approach to manage chronic pain in patients with axSpA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004528","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In many patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), pain persists despite anti-inflammatory medication. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) indirectly assesses altered somatosensory function, though its clinical practicality is limited. The Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI) could be an alternative in the initial assessment of central sensitisation (CS). This study aimed to investigate the value of the CSI in evaluating CS in patients with axSpA by (1) assessing somatosensory function related to CS with QST and (2) exploring associations between CSI, QST, patient and disease characteristics and pain-related psychosocial factors.

Methods: Consecutive outpatients from the Groningen Leeuwarden AxSpA cohort underwent QST, including pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Participants completed questionnaires assessing CS (CSI), illness perception (Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire, IPQ-R), pain-related worrying (Pain Catastrophising Scale, PCS), fatigue (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, MFIS), anxiety/depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS) and coping. QST measurements were stratified for CSI≥40.

Results: 201 patients with axSpA were included; 63% male, 64% radiographic axSpA, median symptom duration 12 years (IQR 5-24), mean Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score 2.1±1.0. Patients with CSI≥40 had significantly lower PPTs and higher TS than CSI<40 (p<0.004). No significant differences in CPM were observed. In multivariable linear regression, sex, PCS, IPQ-R Identity, MFIS and HADS anxiety were independently associated with CSI (78% explained variance).

Conclusion: In this large cross-sectional study in patients with axSpA, the CSI appears as a useful initial CS assessment questionnaire. When CSI scores indicate CS, considering pain-related psychosocial factors is important. These results emphasise the need for a biopsychosocial approach to manage chronic pain in patients with axSpA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轴性脊柱关节炎患者中枢过敏清单的价值。
背景:许多轴性脊柱关节炎(axSpA)患者在服用抗炎药物后疼痛依然存在。定量感觉测试(QST)可间接评估躯体感觉功能的改变,但其临床实用性有限。中枢敏化量表(CSI)可作为初步评估中枢敏化(CS)的替代方法。本研究旨在通过(1)用 QST 评估与 CS 相关的躯体感觉功能;(2)探讨 CSI、QST、患者和疾病特征以及与疼痛相关的社会心理因素之间的关联,研究 CSI 在评估轴性脊柱后凸患者 CS 方面的价值:来自格罗宁根吕伐登 AxSpA 队列的连续门诊患者接受了 QST,包括压力痛阈值 (PPT)、时间总和 (TS) 和条件疼痛调节 (CPM)。参与者填写了评估CS(CSI)、疾病感知(疾病感知问卷修订版,IPQ-R)、疼痛相关担忧(疼痛灾难化量表,PCS)、疲劳(改良疲劳影响量表,MFIS)、焦虑/抑郁(医院焦虑抑郁量表,HADS)和应对能力的问卷。结果:共纳入 201 名 axSpA 患者;其中 63% 为男性,64% 为放射学 axSpA,中位症状持续时间为 12 年(IQR 5-24),平均轴性脊柱关节炎疾病活动度评分为 2.1±1.0。CSI≥40的患者的PPTs明显低于CSI≥40的患者,而TS则高于CSI≥40的患者:在这项针对轴性SpA患者的大型横断面研究中,CSI似乎是一个有用的初始CS评估问卷。当 CSI 评分显示 CS 时,考虑与疼痛相关的社会心理因素非常重要。这些结果表明,需要采用生物-心理-社会方法来管理轴性SpA患者的慢性疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RMD Open
RMD Open RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
205
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.
期刊最新文献
Impact of patient characteristics on ASDAS disease activity state cut-offs in axial spondyloarthritis: results from nine European rheumatology registries. Association between musculoskeletal sonographic features and response to treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Value of the central sensitisation inventory in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Baseline and 2-year differences in spinal symptoms and spinal and hip mobility in early axial spondyloarthritis and non-axial spondyloarthritis chronic back pain patients. Disease response in rheumatoid arthritis across four biologic therapies associates with improvement in paraoxonase-1 activity and oxylipins.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1