RMD Open最新文献

Objectives: To explore the agreement between patient-reported flare status and clinically significant flare status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in sustained remission.

Method: Patients with RA in remission for ≥12 months on stable treatment were included in the ARCTIC REWIND tapering trials and pooled 12-month data used in current analyses. Patient-reported flare status was assessed according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology flare questionnaire; 'Are you having a flare of your RA at this time?' (yes/no). A clinically significant flare was defined as a combination of Disease Activity Score (DAS) >1.6, increase in DAS of ≥0.6 and 2 swollen joints, or the rheumatologist and patient agreed that a clinically significant flare had occurred. Agreement coefficient, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of patient-reported flare status with regard to clinically significant flare status were determined.

Results: Of 248 patients, 64% were women, age 56.1 (11.8) years, disease duration 4.1 (2.8-7.4) years, DAS 0.8 (0.3). 35% of patients reported a flare at least once, clinically significant flares were recorded in 21%. 48/53 clinically significant flares (91%) led to an intensification of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugss. In 621/682 (91%) visits, patient-reported and clinically significant flare status were in agreement, agreement coefficient 0.89. Sensitivity and specificity were both 91%, positive predictive value of patient-reported flare status 46% and negative predictive value 99%.

Conclusion: Among patients in sustained remission, patient-reported flare status was accurate in ruling out a clinically significant flare. About half of the patient-reported flares were assessed to be clinically significant. These findings support a potential for using patient-reported flare status in remote monitoring of patients with RA in sustained remission.

Objectives: To assess the ability of baseline serum biomarkers to predict disease activity and remission status in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) at 18-year follow-up (FU) in a population-based setting.

Methods: Clinical data and serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers were assessed in the longitudinal population-based Nordic JIA cohort study at baseline and at 18-year FU. A panel of 16 inflammatory biomarkers was determined by multiplexed bead array assay. We estimated both univariate and multivariate logistic regression models on binary outcomes of disease activity and remission with baseline variables as explanatory variables.

Results: Out of 349 patients eligible for the Nordic JIA cohort study, 236 (68%) had available serum samples at baseline. We measured significantly higher serum levels of interleukin 1β (IL-1β), IL-6, IL-12p70, IL-13, MMP-3, S100A9 and S100A12 at baseline in patients with active disease at 18-year FU than in patients with inactive disease. Computing receiver operating characteristics illustrating the area under the curve (AUC), we compared a conventional prediction model (gender, age, joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein) with an extended model that also incorporated the 16 baseline biomarkers. Biomarker addition significantly improved the ability of the model to predict activity/inactivity at the 18-year FU, as evidenced by an increase in the AUC from 0.59 to 0.80 (p=0.02). Multiple regression analysis revealed that S100A9 was the strongest predictor of inactive disease 18 years after disease onset.

Conclusion: Biomarkers indicating inflammation at baseline have the potential to improve evaluation of disease activity and prediction of long-term outcomes.

Objective: To develop a multivariable model for predicting the progression of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) over 52 weeks.

Methods: We used logistic regression models to analyse associations between candidate predictors assessed at baseline and progression of SSc-ILD (absolute decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted >5% or death) over 52 weeks in the placebo group of the SENSCIS trial. Analyses were performed in the overall placebo group and in a subgroup with early and/or inflammatory SSc and/or severe skin fibrosis (<18 months since first non-Raynaud symptom, elevated inflammatory markers, and/or modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) >18) at baseline. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: In the overall placebo group (n=288), the performance of the final multivariable model for predicting SSc-ILD progression was moderate (apparent AUC: 0.63). A stronger model, with an apparent AUC of 0.75, was developed in the subgroup with early and/or inflammatory SSc and/or severe skin fibrosis at baseline (n=155). This model included diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) % predicted, time since first non-Raynaud symptom, mRSS, anti-topoisomerase I antibody status and mycophenolate use.

Conclusion: Prediction of the progression of SSc-ILD may require different approaches in distinct subgroups of patients. Among patients with SSc-ILD and early and/or inflammatory SSc and/or severe skin fibrosis, a nomogram based on a multivariable model may be of value for identifying patients at risk of short-term progression.

Background: A consensus definition for active sacroiliitis by MRI, mentioned in the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), was published in 2009 and included a qualitative and quantitative MRI cut-off component. In 2021, updates to the quantitative component were preliminarily proposed. This post hoc analysis of part A of the phase 3 open-label C-OPTIMISE study (NCT02505542) explores the differences by applying the 2009 and preliminary 2021 inflammatory cut-offs on clinical outcomes of axSpA patients treated with certolizumab pegol.

Methods: Baseline MRI scans were used to classify 657 patients as MRI+ or MRI- according to the quantitative components of the 2009 and preliminary 2021 MRI cut-offs for inflammatory lesions. Clinical outcomes, including ASAS ≥40% improvement (ASAS40), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, were reported to week 48.

Results: Across all analysed outcomes, 2009 MRI+ and preliminary 2021 MRI+ subgroups showed similar results. Notably, clinical outcomes for the discordant group (2009 MRI+but preliminary 2021 MRI- group; 53/657 [8.1%]) were close to those seen in MRI- patients according to either 2009 or preliminary 2021 inflammatory cut-offs, and notably different from the totality of MRI+ subgroups.

Conclusion: This analysis suggests that the preliminary 2021 cut-offs for MRI inflammatory lesions may slightly increase the specificity of the quantitative part of the 2009 MRI inflammatory lesion definition. The effects of the updated MRI cut-offs need to be assessed on the basis of efficacy outcomes and with the inclusion of aspects of structural changes.

Trial registration number: NCT02505542.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved outcomes for patients with cancer. However, these therapies are associated with adverse events including de novo immune-related adverse events or flare of pre-exiting autoimmune disorders. Up to 80% of patients with cancer and pre-existing psoriasis (PsO) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) experience PsO/PsA flare after initiating ICIs. Targeting the interleukin (IL)-17/IL-23 axis is a mainstream of the PsO/PsA treatment. However, whether this treatment can effectively control PsO/PsA with ICI exposure while preserving anti-tumour efficacy remains unknown.

Case reports: We report three patients with PsA and cancer, who received ICIs for their cancer treatment. All patients were male. Two patients had clear cell renal cell carcinoma, and one had melanoma. Two patients received anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy, while one patient received combined anti-CTLA-4 and PD-1 antibody therapy. One patient had been receiving anti-IL-17A antibody (secukinumab), while the other two patients started anti-IL-17A antibody (ixekizumab) and anti-IL-23 antibody (guselkumab) after their PsA flared up during ICI treatment. Of note, with the anti-IL-17A or anti-IL-23 antibody treatment, their PsA remained in remission, and they well tolerated the ICI therapy. Importantly, all three patients showed persistent tumour responses to ICI therapy, including two complete remissions and one stable disease, respectively.

Conclusions: These three cases suggest that targeting the IL-17/23 axis may be an effective and safe approach for patients with cancer and pre-existing PsA being considered for ICI therapy.

Objectives: The association between immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) and Sjögren disease (SjD) has been poorly investigated. This study presents the first retrospective cohort of iTTP-SjD aiming to identify risk factors for iTTP occurrence in SjD patients and examine their clinical course.

Methods: Patients with iTTP-SjD were identified within the French TTP Registry based on American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism 2016 criteria. A comparative analysis was conducted with two control groups comprising primary SjD (pSjD) patients from the French ASSESS cohort and idiopathic iTTP patients from the French TTP Registry. Demographic, clinical and biological data were retrospectively collected.

Results: Thirty iTTP-SjD patients were included and compared with 65 pSjD and 45 idiopathic iTTP patients. The majority of iTTP-SjD patients (n=18) were diagnosed with SjD at the time of iTTP diagnosis. In comparison with the pSjD cohort, iTTP-SjD patients were diagnosed with SjD at a younger age (p=0.039) and showed a higher prevalence of anti-SjS-related antigen A antibody positivity and xerostomia (p=0.015, p=0.035, respectively). EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index showed similar activity levels between the two groups. iTTP-SjD patients were treated with plasma exchange (n=28), corticosteroids, rituximab (n=19) and caplacizumab (n=3). In comparison with the idiopathic iTTP cohort, mortality rates (log-rank tests, p=0.228), biological and clinical iTTP relapses (multivariate analysis, p=0.181) were comparable and short-term outcomes (survival at day 30, relapse) were favourable.

Conclusion: iTTP can be a rare complication in patients with SjD. Further studies involving larger cohorts and long-term follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings and to explore the efficacy of immunomodulators and caplacizumab in iTTP-SjD patients.

Introduction: This post hoc analysis evaluated the relationship between objective measures of inflammation and clinical outcomes following 12 weeks of certolizumab pegol (CZP) treatment in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

Methods: We report the proportion of patients achieving ≥50% and ≥75% improvements in clinical composite outcome measures of disease activity (Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS], Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI]) and objective measures of inflammation (C reactive protein [CRP], Ankylosing Spondylitis spine MRI score [ASspiMRI-a] Berlin score and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] MRI Sacroiliac Joints [SIJ] score) following 12 weeks of CZP treatment. Data from two independent readers over four MRI reading campaigns were pooled using a mixed model with repeated measures for each variable.

Results: 136 patients (radiographic axSpA [r-axSpA]: 76; non-radiographic axSpA [nr-axSpA]: 60) were included. Following CZP treatment, CRP, ASspiMRI-a Berlin score and SPARCC SIJ score were reduced by ≥50% in most patients (CRP: 136/136 [100.0%]; Berlin: 73/136 [53.7%]; SPARCC SIJ: 71/136 [52.2%]), and often by ≥75%. Less than half of patients with r-axSpA and nr-axSpA showed ≥50% reduction in clinical responses (BASDAI: 64/136 [47.1%]; ASDAS: 66/136 [48.5%]). These results were also observed at the individual patient level; ≥50% improvements in MRI/CRP inflammatory measures did not translate into similar improvements in clinical responses for most patients.

Conclusion: There is a potential disconnect between objective measures of inflammation and clinical outcome responses in patients with axSpA. The use of only clinical response measures as trial endpoints may underestimate anti-inflammatory treatment effects.

Trial registration number: NCT01087762.