"Kuteteza": A community-engaged COVID-19 Prevention and Protection Initiative in Southern Malawi.

Q1 Medicine Wellcome Open Research Pub Date : 2024-10-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20789.2
Donnie Mategula, Ana Ibarz-Pavón, Melody Sakala, Marlen Chawani, Henry Sambakunsi, Mphatso D Phiri, Latif Ndeketa, Mwiza Sambo, Wisdom Shonga, Clara Sambani, Titus Divala, Steve Vinkhumbo, Dominic Nkhoma, Robert Mataya, Wongani Nyangulugu, Sepeedeh Saleh
{"title":"\"Kuteteza\": A community-engaged COVID-19 Prevention and Protection Initiative in Southern Malawi.","authors":"Donnie Mategula, Ana Ibarz-Pavón, Melody Sakala, Marlen Chawani, Henry Sambakunsi, Mphatso D Phiri, Latif Ndeketa, Mwiza Sambo, Wisdom Shonga, Clara Sambani, Titus Divala, Steve Vinkhumbo, Dominic Nkhoma, Robert Mataya, Wongani Nyangulugu, Sepeedeh Saleh","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20789.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 epidemic in Malawi involved almost 90,000 recorded cases and 2,638 deaths. In response to early concerns about vulnerable older people in rural areas, we developed 'Kuteteza': a COVID-19 mitigation response project. Clinicians, public health professionals, and researchers collaborated with government and district-level staff in two Southern Malawi districts. Interventions included supported 'shielding' of older people - minimising social mixing whilst having their daily needs supported. Additional mitigation strategies included provision of masks, handwashing stations, and soap. Government partnerships allowed additional support for vulnerable groups. We present the findings of a realist project evaluation, assessing the feasibility of this approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collated anonymised descriptive data on Kuteteza procedures and conducted qualitative structured observations in villages involved in the initiative. We carried out three focus groups involving community members, frontline health staff, and volunteers in each setting. These provided deeper insights into experiences of the pandemic and impacts of the intervention, including suggested opportunities during future outbreaks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The project involved 25 villages across two districts, with 1,087 people over the age of 60 voluntarily participating in 'shielding'. Supplies of food, water, and cooking fuel were mostly arranged within the family. In Kuteteza villages, the handwashing stations and soap were widely used, and there was awareness and some observance of COVID-19 prevention measures. The project, including the provision of supplies, was greatly appreciated by communities, but wider contextual constraints - namely widespread economic insecurity - presented persisting challenges. Suggestions for improvement largely concerned project enhancements and extensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through effective stakeholder engagement and contribution to national response strategy, the Kuteteza project helped raise COVID-19 awareness and supported populations at a critical time in the pandemic. Kuteteza approaches were welcomed locally and may be incorporated in future epidemic responses. Supported 'shielding' should be paired with government-led measures to mitigate economic hardship.</p>","PeriodicalId":23677,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20789.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 epidemic in Malawi involved almost 90,000 recorded cases and 2,638 deaths. In response to early concerns about vulnerable older people in rural areas, we developed 'Kuteteza': a COVID-19 mitigation response project. Clinicians, public health professionals, and researchers collaborated with government and district-level staff in two Southern Malawi districts. Interventions included supported 'shielding' of older people - minimising social mixing whilst having their daily needs supported. Additional mitigation strategies included provision of masks, handwashing stations, and soap. Government partnerships allowed additional support for vulnerable groups. We present the findings of a realist project evaluation, assessing the feasibility of this approach.

Methods: We collated anonymised descriptive data on Kuteteza procedures and conducted qualitative structured observations in villages involved in the initiative. We carried out three focus groups involving community members, frontline health staff, and volunteers in each setting. These provided deeper insights into experiences of the pandemic and impacts of the intervention, including suggested opportunities during future outbreaks.

Results: The project involved 25 villages across two districts, with 1,087 people over the age of 60 voluntarily participating in 'shielding'. Supplies of food, water, and cooking fuel were mostly arranged within the family. In Kuteteza villages, the handwashing stations and soap were widely used, and there was awareness and some observance of COVID-19 prevention measures. The project, including the provision of supplies, was greatly appreciated by communities, but wider contextual constraints - namely widespread economic insecurity - presented persisting challenges. Suggestions for improvement largely concerned project enhancements and extensions.

Conclusions: Through effective stakeholder engagement and contribution to national response strategy, the Kuteteza project helped raise COVID-19 awareness and supported populations at a critical time in the pandemic. Kuteteza approaches were welcomed locally and may be incorporated in future epidemic responses. Supported 'shielding' should be paired with government-led measures to mitigate economic hardship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Kuteteza":马拉维南部社区参与的 COVID-19 预防和保护倡议。
背景:在马拉维发生的 COVID-19 疫情中,记录在案的病例近 90,000 例,死亡 2,638 例。为了应对早期对农村地区易受感染老年人的担忧,我们开发了 "Kuteteza":COVID-19 缓解应对项目。临床医生、公共卫生专业人员和研究人员与马拉维南部两个地区的政府和地区工作人员合作。干预措施包括支持老年人的 "防护"--尽量减少社会混杂,同时满足他们的日常需求。其他缓解策略包括提供口罩、洗手站和肥皂。政府合作伙伴关系为弱势群体提供了额外支持。我们介绍了一项现实主义项目评估的结果,评估了这种方法的可行性:我们整理了有关 Kuteteza 程序的匿名描述性数据,并在参与该倡议的村庄进行了定性结构观察。我们开展了三个焦点小组,每个小组都有社区成员、一线医务人员和志愿者参加。这些小组深入探讨了大流行病的经历和干预措施的影响,包括在未来疫情爆发时的机会建议:该项目涉及两个地区的 25 个村庄,有 1,087 名 60 岁以上的老人自愿参与 "防护"。食物、水和烹饪燃料的供应大多由家庭内部安排。在库泰扎村,洗手台和肥皂得到了广泛使用,人们对 COVID-19 预防措施有了一定的了解和遵守。该项目,包括提供物资,得到了社区的高度赞赏,但更广泛的环境限制--即普遍的经济不安全--带来了持续的挑战。改进建议主要涉及项目的加强和扩展:通过利益相关者的有效参与和对国家应对战略的贡献,Kuteteza 项目帮助提高了人们对 COVID-19 的认识,并在大流行病的关键时刻为人们提供了支持。Kuteteza 方法在当地受到欢迎,并可能被纳入未来的流行病应对措施中。得到支持的 "保护 "应与政府主导的缓解经济困难的措施相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wellcome Open Research
Wellcome Open Research Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: Wellcome Open Research publishes scholarly articles reporting any basic scientific, translational and clinical research that has been funded (or co-funded) by Wellcome. Each publication must have at least one author who has been, or still is, a recipient of a Wellcome grant. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others, is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies are all suitable. See the full list of article types here. All articles are published using a fully transparent, author-driven model: the authors are solely responsible for the content of their article. Invited peer review takes place openly after publication, and the authors play a crucial role in ensuring that the article is peer-reviewed by independent experts in a timely manner. Articles that pass peer review will be indexed in PubMed and elsewhere. Wellcome Open Research is an Open Research platform: all articles are published open access; the publishing and peer-review processes are fully transparent; and authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and to provide full and easy access to source data underlying the results to improve reproducibility.
期刊最新文献
testCompareR: an R package to compare two binary diagnostic tests using paired data. Association between type 2 diabetes and periodontitis: a population-based study in the North Peru. The genome sequence of barren brome, Bromus sterilis L. (Poaceae). Organophosphate and carbamate susceptibility profiling of Anopheles gambiae sl. across different ecosystems in southern Benin. "Transgenders are not dinosaurs!" Stigma faced by transgender women in their daily lives in India: implications for research and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1