KIT TOOL-S2 for the Portuguese Healthcare Professional: A Psychometric Analysis.

Q3 Medicine Portuguese Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-06-04 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1159/000538386
Catarina Amaral, Carlos Sequeira, Núria Albacar-Riobóo, Lara Guedes Pinho, Carme Ferré-Grau
{"title":"KIT TOOL-S2 for the Portuguese Healthcare Professional: A Psychometric Analysis.","authors":"Catarina Amaral, Carlos Sequeira, Núria Albacar-Riobóo, Lara Guedes Pinho, Carme Ferré-Grau","doi":"10.1159/000538386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Literacy of health professionals on patient safety aims to prevent and reduce risks and adverse events in healthcare.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to translate, adapt, and validate for Portugal of the World Health Organization Questionnaire to Assess the Implementation of the Multiprofessional Guide.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Following the cultural adaptation process, we carried out a psychometric analysis on a sample of 300 health professionals. The scale was tested for apparent and content validity. Psychometric properties were assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α) through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, and discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis led to a tetra factor structure that accounted for 43.0% of the variance and had an overall alpha of 0.759. The hypothesized structure was submitted to confirmatory factor analysis, and the following items were eliminated from factors 1, 2, and 3 and the respective items: 7; 5; and 3, 4, 5, and 6, due to multicollinearity problems. Overall good-of-fit indexes are reliable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The \"KIT TOOL-S2 TEXT\" scale presents a factor structure with satisfactory validity and reliability results, adequately representing the constructs in question.</p>","PeriodicalId":37244,"journal":{"name":"Portuguese Journal of Public Health","volume":"42 2","pages":"111-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11498910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portuguese Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Literacy of health professionals on patient safety aims to prevent and reduce risks and adverse events in healthcare.

Objective: The objective of this study was to translate, adapt, and validate for Portugal of the World Health Organization Questionnaire to Assess the Implementation of the Multiprofessional Guide.

Methodology: Following the cultural adaptation process, we carried out a psychometric analysis on a sample of 300 health professionals. The scale was tested for apparent and content validity. Psychometric properties were assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α) through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, and discriminant validity.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis led to a tetra factor structure that accounted for 43.0% of the variance and had an overall alpha of 0.759. The hypothesized structure was submitted to confirmatory factor analysis, and the following items were eliminated from factors 1, 2, and 3 and the respective items: 7; 5; and 3, 4, 5, and 6, due to multicollinearity problems. Overall good-of-fit indexes are reliable.

Conclusions: The "KIT TOOL-S2 TEXT" scale presents a factor structure with satisfactory validity and reliability results, adequately representing the constructs in question.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对葡萄牙医疗保健专业人员的 KIT TOOL-S2:心理测量分析。
引言对医疗专业人员进行患者安全扫盲旨在预防和减少医疗风险和不良事件:本研究旨在为葡萄牙翻译、改编和验证世界卫生组织的《多专业指南实施情况评估问卷》:在文化适应过程之后,我们对 300 名卫生专业人员样本进行了心理测量分析。我们对量表的表观效度和内容效度进行了测试。通过探索性和确认性因素分析、收敛效度和区分效度,使用克朗巴赫α系数(α)对心理测量特性进行了评估:探索性因素分析得出了一个四因素结构,该结构占方差的 43.0%,总α系数为 0.759。对假设的结构进行了确认性因子分析,从因子 1、2 和 3 中剔除了以下项目和相应的项目:7;5;3、4、5 和 6,因为存在多重共线性问题。总体拟合指数是可靠的:KIT TOOL-S2 TEXT "量表的因子结构具有令人满意的效度和信度,能够充分反映相关构念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Portuguese Journal of Public Health
Portuguese Journal of Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
55 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mental Health as a Polysemic Construct? Revisiting the Debate about University Students' Unmet Needs. The Potential of Physical Activity for the Control of Cardiovascular Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Cancer: An Often-Overlooked Ally for Public Health and Healthcare Management. Supported Accommodations for People with Serious Mental Disorders: Staff’s Assessment of Work Challenges and Their Impact during COVID-19 Epidemic Intelligence Threat Reporting Profile in Portugal during the COVID-19: 2 Years of Decrease in Reporting on Non-COVID-19 Threats From Health Communication to Health Literacy: A Comprehensive Analysis of Relevance and Strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1