[Effects of antenatal corticosteroids on outcomes of very premature infants and neurodevelopment during infancy].

Zhi Chen, Ming Li, Li-Li Zhang, De Wu
{"title":"[Effects of antenatal corticosteroids on outcomes of very premature infants and neurodevelopment during infancy].","authors":"Zhi Chen, Ming Li, Li-Li Zhang, De Wu","doi":"10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2405073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the effects of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) on the outcomes of very premature infants (VPIs) and neurodevelopment during infancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 190 VPIs admitted to the Department of Pediatrics of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2020 to December 2022. The infants were categorized into four groups based on ACS usage and dosage: no ACS group (<i>n</i>=18), single-course group (<i>n</i>=88), multi-course group (<i>n</i>=40), and partial-course group (<i>n</i>=44). The clinical outcomes, Neonatal Behavioral and Neurological Assessment (NBNA) scores at 40 weeks of corrected age, and Gesell Developmental Schedule (Gesell) scores at 1 year of corrected age were compared among the four groups. The impact of timing of ACS use on the Gesell scores of infants at 1 year of corrected age in VPIs with specific gestational ages was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence rates of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, transient tachypnea of the newborn, and neonatal pneumonia were significantly lower in the partial-course, single-course, and multiple-course groups compared with the no ACS group (<i>P</i><0.008). However, there was no significant difference among the partial-course, single-course, and multiple-course groups (<i>P</i>>0.008). The NBNA scores (behavioral ability, active muscle tone, primitive reflexes, and general assessment) at 40 weeks of corrected age were significantly higher in the no ACS, partial-course, and single-course groups than in the multiple-course group (<i>P</i><0.008). The proportion of VPIs with normal neurodevelopment at 1 year of corrected age was significantly higher in the no ACS, partial-course, and single-course groups than in the multiple-course group (<i>P</i><0.008). The timing of ACS use had no significant effect on neurodevelopment at a corrected age of 1 year in infants with various gestational ages (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACS is crucial for the development of the respiratory system in VPIs, but multiple courses of ACS may cause neurodevelopmental abnormalities. The impact of ACS use on neurodevelopment is independent of gestational age and the timing of ACS use.</p>","PeriodicalId":39792,"journal":{"name":"中国当代儿科杂志","volume":"26 10","pages":"1040-1045"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11527404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国当代儿科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2405073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the effects of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) on the outcomes of very premature infants (VPIs) and neurodevelopment during infancy.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 190 VPIs admitted to the Department of Pediatrics of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2020 to December 2022. The infants were categorized into four groups based on ACS usage and dosage: no ACS group (n=18), single-course group (n=88), multi-course group (n=40), and partial-course group (n=44). The clinical outcomes, Neonatal Behavioral and Neurological Assessment (NBNA) scores at 40 weeks of corrected age, and Gesell Developmental Schedule (Gesell) scores at 1 year of corrected age were compared among the four groups. The impact of timing of ACS use on the Gesell scores of infants at 1 year of corrected age in VPIs with specific gestational ages was analyzed.

Results: The incidence rates of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, transient tachypnea of the newborn, and neonatal pneumonia were significantly lower in the partial-course, single-course, and multiple-course groups compared with the no ACS group (P<0.008). However, there was no significant difference among the partial-course, single-course, and multiple-course groups (P>0.008). The NBNA scores (behavioral ability, active muscle tone, primitive reflexes, and general assessment) at 40 weeks of corrected age were significantly higher in the no ACS, partial-course, and single-course groups than in the multiple-course group (P<0.008). The proportion of VPIs with normal neurodevelopment at 1 year of corrected age was significantly higher in the no ACS, partial-course, and single-course groups than in the multiple-course group (P<0.008). The timing of ACS use had no significant effect on neurodevelopment at a corrected age of 1 year in infants with various gestational ages (P>0.05).

Conclusions: ACS is crucial for the development of the respiratory system in VPIs, but multiple courses of ACS may cause neurodevelopmental abnormalities. The impact of ACS use on neurodevelopment is independent of gestational age and the timing of ACS use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[产前皮质类固醇对极早产儿预后和婴儿期神经发育的影响]。
目的探讨产前皮质类固醇(ACS)对极早产儿(VPIs)预后和婴儿期神经发育的影响:方法:对安徽医科大学第一附属医院儿科2020年1月至2022年12月收治的190名早产儿进行回顾性研究。根据ACS的使用情况和剂量将婴儿分为四组:无ACS组(18例)、单疗程组(88例)、多疗程组(40例)和部分疗程组(44例)。比较了四组的临床结果、40周矫正年龄时的新生儿行为和神经评估(NBNA)评分以及1岁矫正年龄时的格塞尔发育表(Gesell)评分。分析了使用 ACS 的时机对特定胎龄的 VPI 婴儿 1 岁时的 Gesell 评分的影响:结果:与不使用 ACS 组相比,部分使用组、单次使用组和多次使用组的新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征、支气管肺发育不良、新生儿一过性呼吸急促和新生儿肺炎的发病率显著降低(PP>0.008)。无 ACS 组、部分课程组和单一课程组在 40 周矫正年龄时的 NBNA 评分(行为能力、主动肌张力、原始反射和一般评估)明显高于多重课程组(PPP>0.05):ACS对VPI的呼吸系统发育至关重要,但多次使用ACS可能会导致神经发育异常。使用 ACS 对神经发育的影响与胎龄和使用 ACS 的时间无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国当代儿科杂志
中国当代儿科杂志 Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5006
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics (CJCP) is a peer-reviewed open access periodical in the field of pediatrics that is sponsored by the Central South University/Xiangya Hospital of Central South University and under the auspices of the Ministry of Education of China. It is cited as a source in the scientific and technological papers of Chinese journals, the Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), and is one of the core Chinese periodicals in the Peking University Library. CJCP has been indexed by MEDLINE/PubMed/PMC of the American National Library, American Chemical Abstracts (CA), Holland Medical Abstracts (EM), Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPRIM), Scopus and EBSCO. It is a monthly periodical published on the 15th of every month, and is distributed both at home and overseas. The Chinese series publication number is CN 43-1301/R;ISSN 1008-8830. The tenet of CJCP is to “reflect the latest advances and be open to the world”. The periodical reports the most recent advances in the contemporary pediatric field. The majority of the readership is pediatric doctors and researchers.
期刊最新文献
[Berberine ameliorates coronary artery endothelial cell injury in Kawasaki disease through complement and coagulation cascades]. [Clinical characteristics and genetic analysis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 2 diagnosed in childhood]. [Clinical characteristics and long-term follow-up study of basal ganglia infarction after minor head trauma in infants and young children]. [Clinical characteristics and prognosis of acute erythroleukemia in children]. [Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of anemia of prematurity (2025)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1