Bundled payment impacts uptake of prescribed home health care.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Managed Care Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2025.89677
Jun Li, Lacey Loomer
{"title":"Bundled payment impacts uptake of prescribed home health care.","authors":"Jun Li, Lacey Loomer","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether the CMS Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Model, which incentivizes coordinated and efficient care, increased home health care (HHC) uptake among patients referred to HHC after major joint replacement surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study using a difference-in-differences design comparing hospitals in 75 metropolitan statistical areas randomized into CJR by CMS with non-CJR hospitals in 119 areas as controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was the case mix-adjusted, hospital-level HHC uptake rate, which is the rate of patients referred to HHC at hospital discharge receiving an HHC visit within 14 days. Secondary outcomes included HHC uptake rate by race/ethnicity and the quality of HHC agencies used among referrals, which was measured by agency-level improvement in ambulation, unplanned hospitalizations, emergency department visits, time to the first home health visit, and distinct number of agencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the launch of CJR, HHC uptake decreased nationally but there was a 3.73-percentage point (4.5%) lower decrease in CJR hospitals; this was driven by White patients (3.54-percentage point differential; P = .026). A marginally statistically significant (P = .054) 5.05-percentage point differential increase for Black patients was observed due to a slight increase in the treatment group and a large decrease in the control group. There was no statistically significant change for Hispanic or Asian American/Pacific Islander populations. No statistically significant increases were observed in the quality of HHC used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CJR mitigated a trend of decreased HHC uptake, but more work is needed to improve uptake for larger portions of the patient population. Our results suggest that addressing care coordination incentives via CJR may mitigate some racial disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 2","pages":"66-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89677","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the CMS Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Model, which incentivizes coordinated and efficient care, increased home health care (HHC) uptake among patients referred to HHC after major joint replacement surgery.

Study design: Cohort study using a difference-in-differences design comparing hospitals in 75 metropolitan statistical areas randomized into CJR by CMS with non-CJR hospitals in 119 areas as controls.

Methods: The primary outcome was the case mix-adjusted, hospital-level HHC uptake rate, which is the rate of patients referred to HHC at hospital discharge receiving an HHC visit within 14 days. Secondary outcomes included HHC uptake rate by race/ethnicity and the quality of HHC agencies used among referrals, which was measured by agency-level improvement in ambulation, unplanned hospitalizations, emergency department visits, time to the first home health visit, and distinct number of agencies.

Results: After the launch of CJR, HHC uptake decreased nationally but there was a 3.73-percentage point (4.5%) lower decrease in CJR hospitals; this was driven by White patients (3.54-percentage point differential; P = .026). A marginally statistically significant (P = .054) 5.05-percentage point differential increase for Black patients was observed due to a slight increase in the treatment group and a large decrease in the control group. There was no statistically significant change for Hispanic or Asian American/Pacific Islander populations. No statistically significant increases were observed in the quality of HHC used.

Conclusions: CJR mitigated a trend of decreased HHC uptake, but more work is needed to improve uptake for larger portions of the patient population. Our results suggest that addressing care coordination incentives via CJR may mitigate some racial disparities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捆绑支付影响了家庭医疗处方的使用。
目的:研究目的:确定CMS关节置换综合护理(CJR)模式(该模式鼓励协调高效的护理)是否增加了大关节置换手术后转诊至家庭健康护理(HHC)的患者中家庭健康护理的使用率:研究设计:队列研究,采用差分设计,将 CMS 随机纳入 CJR 的 75 个大都市统计区的医院与 119 个地区的非 CJR 医院作为对照进行比较:主要结果是经病例组合调整后的医院一级 HHC 吸收率,即出院时转诊至 HHC 的患者在 14 天内接受 HHC 访问的比率。次要结果包括不同种族/族裔的家庭健康中心接受率以及转诊患者所使用的家庭健康中心机构的质量,其衡量标准是机构层面在步行、非计划住院、急诊就诊、首次家庭健康就诊时间以及不同机构数量方面的改善情况:CJR 启动后,全国范围内的家庭健康服务使用率有所下降,但 CJR 医院的使用率下降了 3.73 个百分点(4.5%);这主要是由白人患者造成的(3.54 个百分点的差异;P = .026)。由于治疗组患者人数略有增加,而对照组患者人数大幅减少,因此观察到黑人患者人数增加了 5.05 个百分点,差异略有统计学意义(P = .054)。西语裔或亚裔美国人/太平洋岛民在统计学上没有明显变化。在所使用的 HHC 质量方面,未观察到有统计学意义的增长:结论:CJR 缓解了 HHC 使用率下降的趋势,但要提高更多患者的 HHC 使用率,还需要做更多的工作。我们的研究结果表明,通过 CJR 解决护理协调激励问题可减轻一些种族差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Health disparities in HIV care and strategies for improving equitable access to care. Financial navigation: lessons from a program in practice. Veterans Health Administration benefit value has little effect on reliance. Bundled payment impacts uptake of prescribed home health care. Development of multipayer claims-based emergency department episodes of care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1