Racial/ethnic disparities in cost-related barriers to care among near-poor beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Managed Care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2024.89622
Alexandra G Hames, Renuka Tipirneni, Galen E Switzer, John Z Ayanian, Jeffrey T Kullgren, Erica Solway, Eric T Roberts
{"title":"Racial/ethnic disparities in cost-related barriers to care among near-poor beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare.","authors":"Alexandra G Hames, Renuka Tipirneni, Galen E Switzer, John Z Ayanian, Jeffrey T Kullgren, Erica Solway, Eric T Roberts","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare racial and ethnic disparities in cost-related medical care and dental care barriers and use of vision care among near-poor Medicare beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage (MA) vs traditional Medicare (TM) overall and stratified by supplemental insurance enrollment.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of 2015-2019 data from the nationally representative Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Propensity score-weighted difference-in-disparities analyses comparing Black-White and Hispanic-White disparities in MA vs TM among near-poor Medicare beneficiaries with incomes between 101% and 250% of the federal poverty level. We assessed differences in cost-related medical care barriers and cost-related dental care barriers as well as receipt of annual eye exams in MA vs TM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For cost-related barriers to medical care, Hispanic-White disparities were narrower by 8.8 (95% CI, -14.0 to -3.6) percentage points in MA relative to TM but differences in Black-White disparities were not statistically significant. MA was not associated with narrower differences in Hispanic-White or Black-White disparities in dental care access. Higher proportions of Black and Hispanic beneficiaries in MA received an annual eye exam vs White beneficiaries in both MA and TM. MA was associated with narrower racial disparities primarily compared with TM without supplemental insurance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among near-poor Black and Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries, MA was associated with greater use of vision care and narrowing of some disparities in cost-related access barriers vs TM. However, MA did not uniformly narrow racial/ethnic disparities in access and use. These findings highlight the importance of maintaining and enhancing features of Medicare coverage that may promote equitable access to care, including additional benefits and lower cost sharing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare racial and ethnic disparities in cost-related medical care and dental care barriers and use of vision care among near-poor Medicare beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage (MA) vs traditional Medicare (TM) overall and stratified by supplemental insurance enrollment.

Study design: Cross-sectional analysis of 2015-2019 data from the nationally representative Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey.

Methods: Propensity score-weighted difference-in-disparities analyses comparing Black-White and Hispanic-White disparities in MA vs TM among near-poor Medicare beneficiaries with incomes between 101% and 250% of the federal poverty level. We assessed differences in cost-related medical care barriers and cost-related dental care barriers as well as receipt of annual eye exams in MA vs TM.

Results: For cost-related barriers to medical care, Hispanic-White disparities were narrower by 8.8 (95% CI, -14.0 to -3.6) percentage points in MA relative to TM but differences in Black-White disparities were not statistically significant. MA was not associated with narrower differences in Hispanic-White or Black-White disparities in dental care access. Higher proportions of Black and Hispanic beneficiaries in MA received an annual eye exam vs White beneficiaries in both MA and TM. MA was associated with narrower racial disparities primarily compared with TM without supplemental insurance.

Conclusions: Among near-poor Black and Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries, MA was associated with greater use of vision care and narrowing of some disparities in cost-related access barriers vs TM. However, MA did not uniformly narrow racial/ethnic disparities in access and use. These findings highlight the importance of maintaining and enhancing features of Medicare coverage that may promote equitable access to care, including additional benefits and lower cost sharing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保险优势计划与传统医疗保险计划中近乎贫困的受益人在医疗费用相关障碍方面的种族/族裔差异。
目的:比较医疗保险优势计划(MA)与传统医疗保险计划(TM)中近乎贫困的医疗保险受益人在与费用相关的医疗护理和牙科护理障碍以及视力护理使用方面的种族和民族差异,并根据补充保险参保情况进行分层:对 2015-2019 年具有全国代表性的医疗保险当前受益人调查数据进行横截面分析:倾向得分加权差异分析比较了收入在联邦贫困线 101% 到 250% 之间的近贫困医疗保险受益人在 MA 与 TM 中的黑人-白人和西班牙裔-白人差异。我们评估了与费用相关的医疗保健障碍和与费用相关的牙科保健障碍以及接受年度眼科检查的情况在 MA 与 TM 中的差异:在与费用相关的医疗障碍方面,西班牙裔与白人之间的差距在医疗保健方面缩小了 8.8 个百分点(95% CI,-14.0 到 -3.6),但黑人与白人之间的差距在统计上并不显著。医疗保险与缩小西班牙裔与白人或黑人与白人在获得牙科护理方面的差距没有关系。接受年度眼科检查的黑人和西班牙裔医保受益人比例高于白人医保受益人。与没有补充保险的 TM 相比,MA 的种族差异更小:结论:在近乎贫困的黑人和西班牙裔医疗保险受益人中,医疗保险与传统医疗保险相比,具有更高的视力保健使用率,并缩小了与费用相关的就医障碍方面的一些差距。然而,医疗保险并没有一致地缩小种族/民族在获得和使用方面的差距。这些发现强调了保持和加强医疗保险的特点的重要性,这些特点可能会促进公平地获得医疗服务,包括额外的福利和较低的费用分担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Accountable care organizations and HPV vaccine uptake: a multilevel analysis. Cost savings from an mHealth tool for improving medication adherence. Hospital stays and probable dementia as predictors of relocation to long-term care facilities. Impact of functional recovery on patients having heart surgery. Patient assignment and quality performance: a misaligned system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1