Safety and efficiency of implementation of high-sensitivity troponin T in the assessment of emergency department patients with cardiac chest pain.

IF 2.4 CJEM Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1007/s43678-024-00778-1
Frank X Scheuermeyer, Andre Mattman, Karin Humphries, Krishnan Ramanathan, Kendeep Kaila, Peter Dodek, Brian Grunau, Eric Grafstein, Grant Innes, Jim Christenson
{"title":"Safety and efficiency of implementation of high-sensitivity troponin T in the assessment of emergency department patients with cardiac chest pain.","authors":"Frank X Scheuermeyer, Andre Mattman, Karin Humphries, Krishnan Ramanathan, Kendeep Kaila, Peter Dodek, Brian Grunau, Eric Grafstein, Grant Innes, Jim Christenson","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00778-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For emergency department (ED) patients with cardiac chest pain, introduction of high-sensitivity troponin (hsTnT) pathways has been associated with reductions in length of stay of less than 1 h.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At two urban Canadian sites, we introduced hsTnT on January 26, 2016. While the prior diagnostic algorithm required troponin testing at 0 and 6 h, serial hsTnT serial testing was conducted at 0 and 3 h. We identified consecutive patients who presented with cardiac chest pain from January 1, 2015, to March 31, 2017, along with 30-day outcomes. The primary outcome was a missed 30-day major adverse cardiac event, (MACE) defined as death, revascularization, or readmission for myocardial infarction occurring in a patient-discharged home with a minimizing diagnosis and without cardiac-specific follow-up. Secondary outcomes included admission rate, ED length of stay, and MACE. We compared pre- and post- implementation periods using descriptive methods and repeated this analysis in patients with noncardiac chest pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 5585 patients with cardiac chest pain, (2678 pre- and 2907 post-introduction) and 434 had (7.8%, 95% CI 7.1 to 8.5%) MACE, with 1 missed MACE. (0.2%, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.3%). Admission rate was stable at 24.1% pre- and 23.7% while median length of stay decreased from 464 to 285 min, a difference of 179 min. (95% CI 61 to 228 min). For 11,611 patients with noncardiac chest pain, admission rate (9%) and length of stay (191 versus 193 min) remained constant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of hsTnT for evaluation of ED chest pain patients was safe and associated with a 3-h decrease in length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"814-818"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00778-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For emergency department (ED) patients with cardiac chest pain, introduction of high-sensitivity troponin (hsTnT) pathways has been associated with reductions in length of stay of less than 1 h.

Methods: At two urban Canadian sites, we introduced hsTnT on January 26, 2016. While the prior diagnostic algorithm required troponin testing at 0 and 6 h, serial hsTnT serial testing was conducted at 0 and 3 h. We identified consecutive patients who presented with cardiac chest pain from January 1, 2015, to March 31, 2017, along with 30-day outcomes. The primary outcome was a missed 30-day major adverse cardiac event, (MACE) defined as death, revascularization, or readmission for myocardial infarction occurring in a patient-discharged home with a minimizing diagnosis and without cardiac-specific follow-up. Secondary outcomes included admission rate, ED length of stay, and MACE. We compared pre- and post- implementation periods using descriptive methods and repeated this analysis in patients with noncardiac chest pain.

Results: We collected 5585 patients with cardiac chest pain, (2678 pre- and 2907 post-introduction) and 434 had (7.8%, 95% CI 7.1 to 8.5%) MACE, with 1 missed MACE. (0.2%, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.3%). Admission rate was stable at 24.1% pre- and 23.7% while median length of stay decreased from 464 to 285 min, a difference of 179 min. (95% CI 61 to 228 min). For 11,611 patients with noncardiac chest pain, admission rate (9%) and length of stay (191 versus 193 min) remained constant.

Conclusions: Implementation of hsTnT for evaluation of ED chest pain patients was safe and associated with a 3-h decrease in length of stay.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在评估急诊科心脏胸痛患者时使用高敏肌钙蛋白 T 的安全性和效率。
背景:对于急诊科(ED)的心脏性胸痛患者,采用高敏肌钙蛋白(hsTnT)治疗路径可缩短患者的住院时间不到 1 小时:对于急诊科(ED)的心源性胸痛患者,引入高敏肌钙蛋白(hsTnT)路径可缩短住院时间,缩短时间不超过 1 小时:我们于 2016 年 1 月 26 日在加拿大的两个城市医疗点引入了 hsTnT。我们确定了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 3 月 31 日期间连续出现心脏胸痛的患者以及 30 天的结果。主要结局是错过了 30 天的主要心脏不良事件(MACE),MACE 定义为患者出院回家后发生的死亡、血管再通或心肌梗死再入院,诊断为最小心肌梗死,且没有心脏特异性随访。次要结果包括入院率、急诊室住院时间和 MACE。我们采用描述性方法比较了实施前和实施后的时间段,并对非心源性胸痛患者重复了这一分析:我们共收集了 5585 例心脏性胸痛患者(实施前 2678 例,实施后 2907 例),其中 434 例(7.8%,95% CI 7.1 至 8.5%)发生了 MACE,1 例未发生 MACE(0.2%,95% CI 0.04 至 1.3%)。入院率稳定在入院前的24.1%和入院后的23.7%,而中位住院时间从464分钟缩短至285分钟,相差179分钟(95% CI 61至228分钟)。在 11,611 名非心源性胸痛患者中,入院率(9%)和住院时间(191 对 193 分钟)保持不变:结论:采用 hsTnT 评估急诊室胸痛患者是安全的,可缩短 3 小时的住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Just the facts: angioedema in the emergency department. Advancing emergency medicine: embracing new horizons. Rural Canadian emergency physician experiences using point-of-care ultrasound. Andexanet for factor Xa inhibitor-associated acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Crowned dens syndrome: a rare differential diagnosis of meningitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1