A Case-Control Split-Mouth Study of Comparison of Maximum Occlusal Forces in Endodontically Treated Teeth and Vital Counterparts.

Mohd Khairul Firdaus Mazlan, Melati Mahmud, Rohana Ahmad, Tong Wah LIm
{"title":"A Case-Control Split-Mouth Study of Comparison of Maximum Occlusal Forces in Endodontically Treated Teeth and Vital Counterparts.","authors":"Mohd Khairul Firdaus Mazlan, Melati Mahmud, Rohana Ahmad, Tong Wah LIm","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the maximum occlusal force in endodontically treated teeth and their vital contralateral counterparts and to evaluate the intraoral factors affecting them.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty adult participants presented with an endodontically treated tooth and its vital contralateral counterpart were recruited, with 15 males and females in each group. Maximum occlusal forces were measured using a wireless sensor network occlusal force recorder, and the mean maximum occlusal force of endodontically treated teeth was compared with that of their vital contralateral counterparts. Multiple-factor ANOVA was used to examine the association between various clinical factors and maximum occlusal force.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean maximum occlusal force for endodontically treated teeth was significantly higher than their vital counterparts (215.44 ± 74.11N and 202.40 ± 70.67N, respectively) (P < 0.001). Among the clinical factors, the maximum occlusal forces were significantly influenced by the location of teeth (P < 0.01) and the crown root ratio (P = 0.01). Upon further analysis of endodontically treated teeth and control groups, the location of teeth was identified as a sole factor associated with maximum occlusal force, with P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The maximum occlusal forces for endodontically treated teeth were statistically significantly higher than those of their corresponding vital contralateral teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the maximum occlusal force in endodontically treated teeth and their vital contralateral counterparts and to evaluate the intraoral factors affecting them.

Materials and methods: Thirty adult participants presented with an endodontically treated tooth and its vital contralateral counterpart were recruited, with 15 males and females in each group. Maximum occlusal forces were measured using a wireless sensor network occlusal force recorder, and the mean maximum occlusal force of endodontically treated teeth was compared with that of their vital contralateral counterparts. Multiple-factor ANOVA was used to examine the association between various clinical factors and maximum occlusal force.

Results: The mean maximum occlusal force for endodontically treated teeth was significantly higher than their vital counterparts (215.44 ± 74.11N and 202.40 ± 70.67N, respectively) (P < 0.001). Among the clinical factors, the maximum occlusal forces were significantly influenced by the location of teeth (P < 0.01) and the crown root ratio (P = 0.01). Upon further analysis of endodontically treated teeth and control groups, the location of teeth was identified as a sole factor associated with maximum occlusal force, with P < 0.05.

Conclusion: The maximum occlusal forces for endodontically treated teeth were statistically significantly higher than those of their corresponding vital contralateral teeth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙髓治疗过的牙齿与正常牙齿最大咬合力比较的病例对照分口研究
目的:比较牙髓治疗过的牙齿和其对侧正常牙齿的最大咬合力,并评估影响它们的口内因素:招募 30 名成年参与者,每组 15 名男性和女性,他们都有一颗牙髓治疗过的牙齿及其对侧的重要牙齿。使用无线传感器网络咬合力记录仪测量最大咬合力,并将根管治疗牙的平均最大咬合力与其对侧活力牙的平均最大咬合力进行比较。采用多因素方差分析研究各种临床因素与最大咬合力之间的关系:结果:根管治疗后牙齿的平均最大咬合力明显高于同侧牙齿(分别为 215.44 ± 74.11N 和 202.40 ± 70.67N)(P < 0.001)。在临床因素中,最大咬合力受牙齿位置(P < 0.01)和冠根比(P = 0.01)的显著影响。进一步分析牙髓治疗组和对照组,发现牙齿位置是唯一与最大咬合力相关的因素,P < 0.05:结论:从统计学角度看,根管治疗牙的最大咬合力明显高于相应的对侧牙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Workflow for Rehabilitation of Severely Discolored Teeth Due to Red Staining from Endodontic Material. Influence of Different Cements on Bonding Efficiency Between Implant Abutment and Standard Restoration. Thirty-Year Clinical Performance of Double-Crown Retained Removable Partial Dentures - A Practice-Based Retrospective Study. Evaluation of the Bond Strengths Between Dental Ceramics and Co-Cr Frameworks Made with Digital and Conventional Techniques. 3D-Printed Permanent Resin Crowns on Pre-Molar and Molar Teeth; Two-Year Results of a Prospective Clinical Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1