Sultan Aktuğ Karademir, Samet Atasoy, Beyza Yilmaz
{"title":"The Effect of Gastric Acid and Material Type on the Surface Roughness of Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Resins.","authors":"Sultan Aktuğ Karademir, Samet Atasoy, Beyza Yilmaz","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the effect of gastric acid on the surface roughness of additive and subtractive manufacturing resin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study, two subtractive-manufacturing CAD/CAM resin nanoceramics (Cerasmart 270 [CS], Lava Ultimate [LU]) and two additive-manufacturing 3D-printing permanent resins (VarseoSmile Crownplus [VSP], Crowntec [CT]) were used. CS and LU samples were turned into 10-mm-diameter cylinders with a scraper and cut into 2-mm slices on the cutting device. CT and VSP samples were produced on a 3D printer (2-mm thickness, 10-mm diameter; n = 15). All samples were exposed to a cycle of 60 seconds of gastric acid, 5 seconds of distilled water, and 30 minutes of artificial saliva, six times a day for 10 days. Surface roughness mean (Ra) and depth (Rz) were measured with a contact profilometer at baseline and after gastric acid cycling. Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 22.0), one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey, and independent t tests (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ra and Rz values of CT and VSP were significantly higher than CS and LU at baseline and after the gastric acid cycle (P < .05). After the gastric acid cycle, the Ra and Rz values of all materials increased significantly compared to baseline (P < .05), but the Ra values of all materials were at a clinically acceptable level (< 0.2 µm).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although additive-manufacturing 3D-printing permanent resins offered higher roughness values, they were still at a clinically acceptable level. Therefore, they can be used as an alternative to subtractive-manufacturing CAD/CAM resin nanoceramics.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"657-664"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the effect of gastric acid on the surface roughness of additive and subtractive manufacturing resin.
Materials and methods: In this study, two subtractive-manufacturing CAD/CAM resin nanoceramics (Cerasmart 270 [CS], Lava Ultimate [LU]) and two additive-manufacturing 3D-printing permanent resins (VarseoSmile Crownplus [VSP], Crowntec [CT]) were used. CS and LU samples were turned into 10-mm-diameter cylinders with a scraper and cut into 2-mm slices on the cutting device. CT and VSP samples were produced on a 3D printer (2-mm thickness, 10-mm diameter; n = 15). All samples were exposed to a cycle of 60 seconds of gastric acid, 5 seconds of distilled water, and 30 minutes of artificial saliva, six times a day for 10 days. Surface roughness mean (Ra) and depth (Rz) were measured with a contact profilometer at baseline and after gastric acid cycling. Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 22.0), one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey, and independent t tests (P < .05).
Results: Ra and Rz values of CT and VSP were significantly higher than CS and LU at baseline and after the gastric acid cycle (P < .05). After the gastric acid cycle, the Ra and Rz values of all materials increased significantly compared to baseline (P < .05), but the Ra values of all materials were at a clinically acceptable level (< 0.2 µm).
Conclusions: Although additive-manufacturing 3D-printing permanent resins offered higher roughness values, they were still at a clinically acceptable level. Therefore, they can be used as an alternative to subtractive-manufacturing CAD/CAM resin nanoceramics.