Urban rooftops for food and energy in China

Rui Yang, Chao Xu, Haoran Zhang, Zhen Wang, Prajal Pradhan, Xihong Lian, Limin Jiao, Xuemei Bai, Shenghui Cui, Yuanchao Hu, Yong-Guan Zhu
{"title":"Urban rooftops for food and energy in China","authors":"Rui Yang, Chao Xu, Haoran Zhang, Zhen Wang, Prajal Pradhan, Xihong Lian, Limin Jiao, Xuemei Bai, Shenghui Cui, Yuanchao Hu, Yong-Guan Zhu","doi":"10.1038/s44284-024-00127-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban rooftop agriculture (RA) and photovoltaic power production (RPV) offer sustainable solutions for the food–energy nexus in cities but compete for limited rooftop space. Here we explore the potential benefits (productivity, economic and environmental) and allocation strategy of RA and RPV across 13 million buildings in 124 Chinese cities, considering urban characteristics and regional productivity. We found that RA yields superior economic benefits, while RPV excels in greenhouse gas emission reductions. Prioritizing either RA or RPV can only retain 0–29% of the above benefits brought by the other. However, allocating 61% of the flat rooftop area to RA and all the remaining (including pitched rooftops) to RPV would retain >50% of their potential, meeting 15% (mean, 0.5–99% across cities) of urban vegetable needs and 5% (0.5–27% across cities) of the electricity needs. While the productivity from RA and RPV have significant environmental and socioeconomic benefits, they require considerable water (up to 15% of urban residential water use) and materials (for example, totaling 13 kt silver). This study proposes that the optimal allocation of roof area for rooftop agriculture and photovoltaics is 61% of the flat rooftop area to the former and the rest for the latter. However, maintaining this productivity requires considerable water use and materials.","PeriodicalId":501700,"journal":{"name":"Nature Cities","volume":"1 11","pages":"741-750"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-024-00127-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban rooftop agriculture (RA) and photovoltaic power production (RPV) offer sustainable solutions for the food–energy nexus in cities but compete for limited rooftop space. Here we explore the potential benefits (productivity, economic and environmental) and allocation strategy of RA and RPV across 13 million buildings in 124 Chinese cities, considering urban characteristics and regional productivity. We found that RA yields superior economic benefits, while RPV excels in greenhouse gas emission reductions. Prioritizing either RA or RPV can only retain 0–29% of the above benefits brought by the other. However, allocating 61% of the flat rooftop area to RA and all the remaining (including pitched rooftops) to RPV would retain >50% of their potential, meeting 15% (mean, 0.5–99% across cities) of urban vegetable needs and 5% (0.5–27% across cities) of the electricity needs. While the productivity from RA and RPV have significant environmental and socioeconomic benefits, they require considerable water (up to 15% of urban residential water use) and materials (for example, totaling 13 kt silver). This study proposes that the optimal allocation of roof area for rooftop agriculture and photovoltaics is 61% of the flat rooftop area to the former and the rest for the latter. However, maintaining this productivity requires considerable water use and materials.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国城市屋顶的粮食和能源
城市屋顶农业(RA)和光伏发电(RPV)为城市中的粮食与能源关系提供了可持续的解决方案,但却要争夺有限的屋顶空间。在此,我们结合城市特点和区域生产力,在中国 124 个城市的 1300 万栋建筑中探讨了屋顶农业和光伏发电的潜在效益(生产力、经济和环境)和分配策略。我们发现,RA 能产生更优越的经济效益,而 RPV 则能减少温室气体排放。优先考虑 RA 或 RPV 只能保留对方带来的上述效益的 0-29%。然而,如果将 61% 的平屋顶面积分配给太阳能电池板,将其余所有面积(包括斜屋顶)分配给太阳能光伏发电,则可保留其 50% 的潜力,满足 15% 的城市蔬菜需求(各城市平均值为 0.5-99%)和 5% 的电力需求(各城市平均值为 0.5-27%)。虽然RA和RPV的生产力具有显著的环境和社会经济效益,但它们需要大量的水(高达城市居民用水量的15%)和材料(例如,总计13千吨银)。本研究提出,屋顶农业和光伏发电的最佳屋顶面积分配为前者占平屋顶面积的 61%,后者占平屋顶面积的其余部分。然而,要维持这一生产率,需要大量用水和材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From local to global and in between, urban context counts Long-term exposure to ambient benzene and brain disorders among urban adults Regulation of humid heat by urban green space across a climate wetness gradient Criminal governance and social order in Nottingham, England Unequal access to social, environmental and health amenities in US urban parks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1