Modeled temperature, mortality impact and external benefits of cool roofs and rooftop photovoltaics in London

Charles H. Simpson, Oscar Brousse, Tim Taylor, James Grellier, Jonathon Taylor, Lora E. Fleming, Mike Davies, Clare Heaviside
{"title":"Modeled temperature, mortality impact and external benefits of cool roofs and rooftop photovoltaics in London","authors":"Charles H. Simpson, Oscar Brousse, Tim Taylor, James Grellier, Jonathon Taylor, Lora E. Fleming, Mike Davies, Clare Heaviside","doi":"10.1038/s44284-024-00138-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Population exposure to high temperatures poses health risks and increases mortality. ‘Cool roofs’ (high-albedo roofs) and rooftop photovoltaics (RPV) may reduce temperatures in urban areas. Here, using advanced urban climate modeling, we model impacts of these measures on air temperature and heat-related mortality in London during the record-breaking hot summer of 2018. We estimate changes in mean near-surface air temperature of −0.3 °C in the RPV scenario and −0.8 °C in the cool roof scenario. We find that the heat-related mortality in this period (estimated 655–920) could have been reduced by 96 (12%) by RPV, or 249 (32%) by cool roofs, in scenarios where all roofs have these measures. Monetized using value of statistical life, we estimate benefits for RPV and cool roofs of £237 M and £615 M, respectively. We estimate that up to 20 TWh of electrical energy would be generated in the full RPV scenario. We show that, for conditions such as in London June–August 2018, RPV or cool roofs may reduce near-surface air temperatures and associated heat-related mortality, with cool roofs having a larger effect. This study used the case of summer 2018 in London to show that rooftop photovoltaics could have reduced heat-related mortality by 12% while cool roofs could have reduced it by 32%. In addition, rooftop photovoltaics generate up to 20 TWh of electricity.","PeriodicalId":501700,"journal":{"name":"Nature Cities","volume":"1 11","pages":"751-759"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-024-00138-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-024-00138-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population exposure to high temperatures poses health risks and increases mortality. ‘Cool roofs’ (high-albedo roofs) and rooftop photovoltaics (RPV) may reduce temperatures in urban areas. Here, using advanced urban climate modeling, we model impacts of these measures on air temperature and heat-related mortality in London during the record-breaking hot summer of 2018. We estimate changes in mean near-surface air temperature of −0.3 °C in the RPV scenario and −0.8 °C in the cool roof scenario. We find that the heat-related mortality in this period (estimated 655–920) could have been reduced by 96 (12%) by RPV, or 249 (32%) by cool roofs, in scenarios where all roofs have these measures. Monetized using value of statistical life, we estimate benefits for RPV and cool roofs of £237 M and £615 M, respectively. We estimate that up to 20 TWh of electrical energy would be generated in the full RPV scenario. We show that, for conditions such as in London June–August 2018, RPV or cool roofs may reduce near-surface air temperatures and associated heat-related mortality, with cool roofs having a larger effect. This study used the case of summer 2018 in London to show that rooftop photovoltaics could have reduced heat-related mortality by 12% while cool roofs could have reduced it by 32%. In addition, rooftop photovoltaics generate up to 20 TWh of electricity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伦敦凉爽屋顶和屋顶光伏发电的温度、死亡率影响和外部效益模型
人口暴露在高温下会带来健康风险并增加死亡率。凉爽屋顶"(高隔热屋顶)和屋顶光伏发电(RPV)可以降低城市地区的气温。在此,我们利用先进的城市气候建模,模拟了这些措施在 2018 年破纪录的炎热夏季对伦敦气温和热相关死亡率的影响。我们估计,在 RPV 情景下,近地面平均气温的变化为-0.3 °C,而在凉爽屋顶情景下,近地面平均气温的变化为-0.8 °C。我们发现,在所有屋顶都采用这些措施的情景下,RPV 可使这一时期的热相关死亡率(估计为 655-920 例)降低 96 例(12%),凉爽屋顶可使这一时期的热相关死亡率降低 249 例(32%)。使用统计寿命值进行货币化,我们估计可变资本和冷却屋顶的效益分别为 2.37 亿英镑和 6.15 亿英镑。我们估计,在全部 RPV 方案中,可产生高达 20 太瓦时的电能。我们表明,在伦敦 2018 年 6 月至 8 月这样的条件下,RPV 或凉爽屋顶可降低近地面气温和相关的热相关死亡率,凉爽屋顶的效果更大。本研究以伦敦 2018 年夏季为例,表明屋顶光伏发电可将与热相关的死亡率降低 12%,而凉爽屋顶可将死亡率降低 32%。此外,屋顶光伏发电可产生多达 20 TWh 的电力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From local to global and in between, urban context counts Long-term exposure to ambient benzene and brain disorders among urban adults Regulation of humid heat by urban green space across a climate wetness gradient Criminal governance and social order in Nottingham, England Unequal access to social, environmental and health amenities in US urban parks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1