An open-source approach for measuring corporate impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity

IF 8.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Communications Earth & Environment Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1038/s43247-024-01797-7
Lisa Mandle, Andrew Shea, Emily Soth, Jesse A. Goldstein, Stacie Wolny, Jeffrey R. Smith, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Richard P. Sharp, Mayur Patel
{"title":"An open-source approach for measuring corporate impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity","authors":"Lisa Mandle, Andrew Shea, Emily Soth, Jesse A. Goldstein, Stacie Wolny, Jeffrey R. Smith, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Richard P. Sharp, Mayur Patel","doi":"10.1038/s43247-024-01797-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing approaches to evaluating companies on sustainability-related issues include limited accounting of impacts on nature and its contributions to human well-being. Here we present an approach for quantifying the direct impacts of companies’ physical assets on nature based on global maps for eight ecosystem service and biodiversity metrics. We apply this approach to a set of over 2000 global, publicly traded companies with 580,000 mapped physical assets and find that companies in utility, real estate, materials, and financial sectors have the largest impacts on average, with substantial variation within all sectors. Using high-spatial-resolution satellite imagery to map individual mine footprints, we compare a set of active lithium mines and find that impacts vary substantially among mines and change over time. By using open-source models and drawing on the growing availability of high-spatial-resolution satellite imagery, this approach could provide more transparent measures of corporate impacts to nature for nature-related reporting. The direct impact of companies’ physical assets on the environment can be estimated from global maps of ecosystem services and biodiversity to understand companies’ nature-related risks and opportunities, according to an assessment of more than 2000 global companies.","PeriodicalId":10530,"journal":{"name":"Communications Earth & Environment","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01797-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Earth & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01797-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing approaches to evaluating companies on sustainability-related issues include limited accounting of impacts on nature and its contributions to human well-being. Here we present an approach for quantifying the direct impacts of companies’ physical assets on nature based on global maps for eight ecosystem service and biodiversity metrics. We apply this approach to a set of over 2000 global, publicly traded companies with 580,000 mapped physical assets and find that companies in utility, real estate, materials, and financial sectors have the largest impacts on average, with substantial variation within all sectors. Using high-spatial-resolution satellite imagery to map individual mine footprints, we compare a set of active lithium mines and find that impacts vary substantially among mines and change over time. By using open-source models and drawing on the growing availability of high-spatial-resolution satellite imagery, this approach could provide more transparent measures of corporate impacts to nature for nature-related reporting. The direct impact of companies’ physical assets on the environment can be estimated from global maps of ecosystem services and biodiversity to understand companies’ nature-related risks and opportunities, according to an assessment of more than 2000 global companies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量企业对生态系统服务和生物多样性影响的开源方法
评估公司可持续性相关问题的现有方法对自然的影响及其对人类福祉的贡献考虑有限。在此,我们提出了一种基于八种生态系统服务和生物多样性指标的全球地图来量化公司实物资产对自然的直接影响的方法。我们将这一方法应用于全球 2000 多家上市公司的 580,000 幅有形资产地图,结果发现,公用事业、房地产、材料和金融行业的公司平均影响最大,但各行业内部差异很大。利用高空间分辨率卫星图像绘制单个矿山的足迹图,我们对一组活跃的锂矿进行了比较,发现不同矿山的影响差异很大,并且随着时间的推移而变化。通过使用开源模型和利用日益普及的高空间分辨率卫星图像,这种方法可以为自然相关报告提供更透明的企业对自然影响的衡量标准。根据对全球 2000 多家公司的评估,可以从生态系统服务和生物多样性的全球地图中估算出公司有形资产对环境的直接影响,从而了解公司与自然相关的风险和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communications Earth & Environment
Communications Earth & Environment Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
269
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Communications Earth & Environment is an open access journal from Nature Portfolio publishing high-quality research, reviews and commentary in all areas of the Earth, environmental and planetary sciences. Research papers published by the journal represent significant advances that bring new insight to a specialized area in Earth science, planetary science or environmental science. Communications Earth & Environment has a 2-year impact factor of 7.9 (2022 Journal Citation Reports®). Articles published in the journal in 2022 were downloaded 1,412,858 times. Median time from submission to the first editorial decision is 8 days.
期刊最新文献
National ecosystem restoration pledges are mismatched with social-ecological enabling conditions A conceptual model explaining spatial variation in soil nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural fields Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation slowdown modulates wind-driven circulations in a warmer climate Provincial inequalities in life cycle carbon dioxide emissions and air pollutants from electric vehicles in China The climatic pattern of East Asia shifted in response to cratonic thinning in the Early Cretaceous
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1