Effects of low-density development on stream biota: Evidence for biotic homogenization from an assemblage perspective

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112753
Kelsey J. Solomon , Jeremy C. Sullivan , Edward P. Gardiner , Mark C. Scott , Rebecca J. Bixby , Seth J. Wenger , C. Rhett Jackson , Catherine M. Pringle
{"title":"Effects of low-density development on stream biota: Evidence for biotic homogenization from an assemblage perspective","authors":"Kelsey J. Solomon ,&nbsp;Jeremy C. Sullivan ,&nbsp;Edward P. Gardiner ,&nbsp;Mark C. Scott ,&nbsp;Rebecca J. Bixby ,&nbsp;Seth J. Wenger ,&nbsp;C. Rhett Jackson ,&nbsp;Catherine M. Pringle","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Land use/land cover change from forested to developed land is a major threat to freshwater biodiversity globally. However, existing research has focused on high-density development in urban centers. We know less about how low-density development affects stream biodiversity, even though increases in low-density development have been documented across the globe and may be tied to the homogenization of stream biotic assemblages. Here, we investigated the diversity (alpha and beta) and assemblage composition of algal diatoms and fish over a ten-year period at three points in time (2000, 2005, 2010) in forested watersheds (n = 4) and watersheds experiencing increasing low-density development (“developing watersheds”; n = 4) in the southern Appalachian Mountains of western North Carolina, USA. We employed a repeated snapshot sampling approach for the data collection. In developing watersheds, we observed higher alpha diversity and different species assemblages for both diatoms and fishes compared to forested watersheds. These differences were attributed to the establishment and/or higher abundances of cosmopolitan diatoms (e.g., <em>Achnanthidium rivulare</em> Potapova and Ponader, <em>Navicula</em> spp., <em>Nitzschia</em> spp.) as well as fishes (e.g., Creek Chub [<em>Semotilus atromaculatus</em>] and Blacknose Dace [<em>Rhinichthys atratulus</em>]). Most endemic species persisted in developing reaches, but in lower abundances (e.g., diatoms: <em>Meridion alansmithii</em> Brant; fishes: Mottled Sculpin [<em>Cottus bairdi</em>]). Diatom beta diversity within developing reaches was lower compared to forested reaches, and lower in 2005 and 2010 compared to 2000. Diatom assemblage composition also changed over time in developing reaches but remained stable in forested reaches. In contrast, fish beta diversity showed no significant differences between watershed types or among years, suggesting that diatom assemblages may respond more quickly or to lower levels of watershed development than fish assemblages. We conclude that biotic assemblages in streams draining developing watersheds in southern Appalachia show evidence of homogenization, but not yet extirpation of endemic taxa. Our study demonstrates the importance of understanding the effects of low-density development on biodiversity in stream ecosystems around the world before native species are lost.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 112753"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2401210X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Land use/land cover change from forested to developed land is a major threat to freshwater biodiversity globally. However, existing research has focused on high-density development in urban centers. We know less about how low-density development affects stream biodiversity, even though increases in low-density development have been documented across the globe and may be tied to the homogenization of stream biotic assemblages. Here, we investigated the diversity (alpha and beta) and assemblage composition of algal diatoms and fish over a ten-year period at three points in time (2000, 2005, 2010) in forested watersheds (n = 4) and watersheds experiencing increasing low-density development (“developing watersheds”; n = 4) in the southern Appalachian Mountains of western North Carolina, USA. We employed a repeated snapshot sampling approach for the data collection. In developing watersheds, we observed higher alpha diversity and different species assemblages for both diatoms and fishes compared to forested watersheds. These differences were attributed to the establishment and/or higher abundances of cosmopolitan diatoms (e.g., Achnanthidium rivulare Potapova and Ponader, Navicula spp., Nitzschia spp.) as well as fishes (e.g., Creek Chub [Semotilus atromaculatus] and Blacknose Dace [Rhinichthys atratulus]). Most endemic species persisted in developing reaches, but in lower abundances (e.g., diatoms: Meridion alansmithii Brant; fishes: Mottled Sculpin [Cottus bairdi]). Diatom beta diversity within developing reaches was lower compared to forested reaches, and lower in 2005 and 2010 compared to 2000. Diatom assemblage composition also changed over time in developing reaches but remained stable in forested reaches. In contrast, fish beta diversity showed no significant differences between watershed types or among years, suggesting that diatom assemblages may respond more quickly or to lower levels of watershed development than fish assemblages. We conclude that biotic assemblages in streams draining developing watersheds in southern Appalachia show evidence of homogenization, but not yet extirpation of endemic taxa. Our study demonstrates the importance of understanding the effects of low-density development on biodiversity in stream ecosystems around the world before native species are lost.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低密度开发对溪流生物群的影响:从组合角度看生物同质化的证据
从林地到开发地的土地利用/土地覆盖变化是全球淡水生物多样性面临的主要威胁。然而,现有的研究主要集中于城市中心的高密度开发。我们对低密度开发如何影响溪流生物多样性的了解较少,尽管低密度开发的增加在全球各地都有记录,而且可能与溪流生物群的同质化有关。在此,我们调查了美国北卡罗来纳州西部阿巴拉契亚山脉南部的森林流域(n = 4)和低密度开发不断增加的流域("开发中流域";n = 4)在十年内三个时间点(2000 年、2005 年和 2010 年)的藻类硅藻和鱼类的多样性(α 和β)和组合组成。我们采用重复快照取样法收集数据。与森林流域相比,我们在发展中流域观察到更高的α多样性以及硅藻和鱼类的不同物种组合。这些差异归因于世界性硅藻(如 Achnanthidium rivulare Potapova and Ponader、Navicula spp.、Nitzschia spp.)和鱼类(如 Creek Chub [Semotilus atromaculatus] 和 Blacknose Dace [Rhinichthys atratulus])的建立和/或更高的丰度。大多数特有物种在发展中的河段依然存在,但数量较少(如硅藻:Meridion alansmithii Brant;鱼类:例如硅藻:Meridion alansmithii Brant;鱼类:Mottled Sculpin [Cottus bairdi])。发展中河段的硅藻 beta 多样性低于森林河段,2005 年和 2010 年低于 2000 年。发展中河段的硅藻群组成也随时间变化,但森林河段的硅藻群组成保持稳定。相比之下,不同流域类型或不同年份之间的鱼类贝塔多样性没有明显差异,这表明硅藻群可能比鱼类群更快或更容易对较低水平的流域开发做出反应。我们的结论是,在阿巴拉契亚南部发展中流域排水的溪流中,生物群落显示出同质化的迹象,但特有类群尚未灭绝。我们的研究表明,在本地物种消失之前,了解低密度开发对世界各地溪流生态系统生物多样性的影响非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
A review of interactions between irrigation and evapotranspiration Hydrological dynamics and its impact on wetland ecological functions in the Sanjiang Plain, China Integrating spatial relationships in the DEA approach for ecological efficiency evaluation: A case study of the Chaohu watershed Cumulative effects of climate change and land use on the ecological status of Scandinavian lakes show contrasted interactions in different ecoregions: the role of pre-disturbance conditions in assessing ecological status Construction of prediction model for water retention of forest ecosystem in alpine region based on vegetation spectral features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1