Dynamic assessment and prediction of potato disaster loss risk in Gansu Province, China

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112626
Feng Fang , Jing Wang , Jianying Jia , Fei Yin , Pengcheng Huang , Dawei Wang
{"title":"Dynamic assessment and prediction of potato disaster loss risk in Gansu Province, China","authors":"Feng Fang ,&nbsp;Jing Wang ,&nbsp;Jianying Jia ,&nbsp;Fei Yin ,&nbsp;Pengcheng Huang ,&nbsp;Dawei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Meteorological disasters occur frequently, and Gansu Province is a sensitive area for food production. Potatoes are a major crop in this province. As a result, executing risk zoning and risk prediction for potato production is quite important. However, in existing risk assessment and prediction research, the dynamic nature of risks and improving the accuracy of risk prediction are urgent scientific issues that must be addressed. Weighting, spatial econometric analysis, climate diagnosis technology, and machine learning models were used to provide a refined spatiotemporal evolution of potato disaster risk in China's Gansu Province, as well as predict future potato production risk. The findings indicate that there are significant interdecadal fluctuations in the potato disaster loss, which has decreased considerably since 2000. The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively, and the county percentage susceptible to severe yield loss was 26.1%, 39.1%, 22.9%, and 12.9%. Second, most counties' potato production falls within the medium–low or low risk region. Eastern and southern Gansu are particularly vulnerable to catastrophic calamities. High risk counties are primarily clustered in Qingyang and Longnan, whereas low risk counties are concentrated in Wuwei and Gannan. Third, high risk locations have altered, and the migration trajectory of the risk indicator’s barycenter shows significant differences in direction and distance. The comprehensive risk moves in a southeast-west-northern direction, but the distance is short. Overall, disaster losses in most counties are decreasing, and future trends will be similar with previous patterns. The Interpolation-EMD-SVM scheme greatly increases the accuracy of the disaster loss risk prediction. The technology and methods provide a scientific foundation for accurately assessing risk dynamic characteristics, managing regional disaster risks, and preventing and mitigating disasters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 112626"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24010835","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meteorological disasters occur frequently, and Gansu Province is a sensitive area for food production. Potatoes are a major crop in this province. As a result, executing risk zoning and risk prediction for potato production is quite important. However, in existing risk assessment and prediction research, the dynamic nature of risks and improving the accuracy of risk prediction are urgent scientific issues that must be addressed. Weighting, spatial econometric analysis, climate diagnosis technology, and machine learning models were used to provide a refined spatiotemporal evolution of potato disaster risk in China's Gansu Province, as well as predict future potato production risk. The findings indicate that there are significant interdecadal fluctuations in the potato disaster loss, which has decreased considerably since 2000. The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively, and the county percentage susceptible to severe yield loss was 26.1%, 39.1%, 22.9%, and 12.9%. Second, most counties' potato production falls within the medium–low or low risk region. Eastern and southern Gansu are particularly vulnerable to catastrophic calamities. High risk counties are primarily clustered in Qingyang and Longnan, whereas low risk counties are concentrated in Wuwei and Gannan. Third, high risk locations have altered, and the migration trajectory of the risk indicator’s barycenter shows significant differences in direction and distance. The comprehensive risk moves in a southeast-west-northern direction, but the distance is short. Overall, disaster losses in most counties are decreasing, and future trends will be similar with previous patterns. The Interpolation-EMD-SVM scheme greatly increases the accuracy of the disaster loss risk prediction. The technology and methods provide a scientific foundation for accurately assessing risk dynamic characteristics, managing regional disaster risks, and preventing and mitigating disasters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国甘肃省马铃薯灾害损失风险动态评估与预测
气象灾害频发,甘肃省是粮食生产的敏感地区。马铃薯是该省的主要农作物。因此,对马铃薯生产进行风险区划和风险预测相当重要。然而,在现有的风险评估和预测研究中,风险的动态性和提高风险预测的准确性是亟待解决的科学问题。本研究采用加权法、空间计量经济学分析、气候诊断技术和机器学习模型,对中国甘肃省马铃薯灾害风险的时空演变进行了精细化分析,并对未来马铃薯生产风险进行了预测。研究结果表明,马铃薯灾害损失存在明显的年代际波动,自2000年以来,灾害损失大幅减少。20世纪80年代、90年代、2000年代和2010年代的平均减产率分别为-13.9%、-15.4%、-9.1%和-7.3%,易受严重减产影响的县比例分别为26.1%、39.1%、22.9%和12.9%。其次,大部分县的马铃薯生产属于中低风险区。甘肃东部和南部特别容易遭受灾害性灾难。高风险县主要集中在庆阳和陇南,而低风险县主要集中在武威和甘南。三是高风险区位发生变化,风险指标极心的迁移轨迹在方向和距离上存在显著差异。综合风险向东南西北方向移动,但距离较短。总体而言,大部分县的灾害损失在减少,未来的趋势将与之前的模式相似。插值-EMD-SVM 方案大大提高了灾害损失风险预测的准确性。该技术和方法为准确评估风险动态特征、管理区域灾害风险和防灾减灾提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
Urban forest indicator assessment for nature-based solutions to connect biodiversity and people Drivers of prehistoric cultural evolution in the Chengdu Plain: Fire events and environmental changes during the middle and late Holocene A novel integrated socio-ecological-economic index for assessing heat health risk Long-term water quality dynamics and trend assessment reveal the effectiveness of ecological compensation: Insights from China’s first cross-provincial compensation watershed Tracking ecosystem stability across boreal Siberia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1