Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia comorbid with chronic benign pain – A randomized controlled trial

K. Bothelius , S. Jernelöv , V. Kaldo , C. Lu , M.-M. Stråle , M. Jansson-Fröjmark
{"title":"Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia comorbid with chronic benign pain – A randomized controlled trial","authors":"K. Bothelius ,&nbsp;S. Jernelöv ,&nbsp;V. Kaldo ,&nbsp;C. Lu ,&nbsp;M.-M. Stråle ,&nbsp;M. Jansson-Fröjmark","doi":"10.1016/j.invent.2024.100781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Comorbid sleep disturbances are common among individuals with chronic pain, and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-i) has proven effective for such individuals. Nonetheless, research on web-based CBT-i tailored for patients with both chronic pain and insomnia is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of internet-based CBT-i and to explore potential mechanisms underlying treatment outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study, 85 participants suffering from comorbid insomnia and chronic pain were randomized into two groups: Internet-based CBT for Insomnia (ICBT-i) and Internet-based Applied Relaxation (IAR). Both interventions spanned eight weeks, supported by therapeutic guidance throughout.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participation was modest, with an average module completion of 2.0 out of 8 for ICBT-i and 2.4 for IAR. Both interventions significantly alleviated insomnia symptoms on one of the insomnia measures post-treatment, without notable differences between them. Directly after treatment, IAR outperformed ICBT-i in reducing pain interference, anxiety, and in enhancing self-rated health, though these differences lessened at the 6-month follow-up. Potential therapeutic mechanisms may involve attenuating maladaptive sleep beliefs and augmenting sleep-related willingness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study encountered low engagement rates, with approximately one-third of participants not completing any module. The limited efficacy of ICBT-i may be due to low treatment involvement, with few patients completing key techniques like sleep compression and stimulus control. Despite the low adherence, both interventions yielded post-treatment improvements in insomnia symptoms, but to establish internet-based treatments for insomnia as a viable option in chronic pain management, patient engagement must be improved.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48615,"journal":{"name":"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100781"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782924000745","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Comorbid sleep disturbances are common among individuals with chronic pain, and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-i) has proven effective for such individuals. Nonetheless, research on web-based CBT-i tailored for patients with both chronic pain and insomnia is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of internet-based CBT-i and to explore potential mechanisms underlying treatment outcomes.

Methods

In this study, 85 participants suffering from comorbid insomnia and chronic pain were randomized into two groups: Internet-based CBT for Insomnia (ICBT-i) and Internet-based Applied Relaxation (IAR). Both interventions spanned eight weeks, supported by therapeutic guidance throughout.

Results

Participation was modest, with an average module completion of 2.0 out of 8 for ICBT-i and 2.4 for IAR. Both interventions significantly alleviated insomnia symptoms on one of the insomnia measures post-treatment, without notable differences between them. Directly after treatment, IAR outperformed ICBT-i in reducing pain interference, anxiety, and in enhancing self-rated health, though these differences lessened at the 6-month follow-up. Potential therapeutic mechanisms may involve attenuating maladaptive sleep beliefs and augmenting sleep-related willingness.

Conclusions

The study encountered low engagement rates, with approximately one-third of participants not completing any module. The limited efficacy of ICBT-i may be due to low treatment involvement, with few patients completing key techniques like sleep compression and stimulus control. Despite the low adherence, both interventions yielded post-treatment improvements in insomnia symptoms, but to establish internet-based treatments for insomnia as a viable option in chronic pain management, patient engagement must be improved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于互联网的认知行为疗法治疗合并慢性良性疼痛的失眠症--随机对照试验
背景慢性疼痛患者普遍存在睡眠障碍,而失眠认知行为疗法(CBT-i)已被证明对这类患者有效。然而,针对慢性疼痛和失眠患者量身定制的基于网络的 CBT-i 研究还很有限。本研究旨在评估基于网络的 CBT-i 的可行性和疗效,并探索治疗结果的潜在机制。方法在本研究中,85 名同时患有失眠症和慢性疼痛的参与者被随机分为两组:基于互联网的失眠 CBT(ICBT-i)和基于互联网的应用放松(IAR)。结果参与率不高,ICBT-i 的平均模块完成率为 2.0(满分 8 分),IAR 的平均模块完成率为 2.4(满分 8 分)。在治疗后的失眠测量中,两种干预方法都能明显减轻失眠症状,但两者之间没有明显差异。治疗后,IAR 在减少疼痛干扰、焦虑和提高自我健康评价方面的表现优于 ICBT-i,但这些差异在 6 个月的随访中有所缩小。潜在的治疗机制可能包括减轻不良睡眠信念和增强与睡眠相关的意愿。结论该研究的参与率较低,约有三分之一的参与者没有完成任何模块。ICBT-i 的疗效有限可能是由于治疗参与度低,只有少数患者完成了睡眠压缩和刺激控制等关键技术。尽管坚持率较低,但这两种干预方法都能在治疗后改善失眠症状,但要将基于互联网的失眠治疗方法确立为慢性疼痛治疗的可行选择,必须提高患者的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
9.30%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ESRII) and the International Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ISRII). The aim of Internet Interventions is to publish scientific, peer-reviewed, high-impact research on Internet interventions and related areas. Internet Interventions welcomes papers on the following subjects: • Intervention studies targeting the promotion of mental health and featuring the Internet and/or technologies using the Internet as an underlying technology, e.g. computers, smartphone devices, tablets, sensors • Implementation and dissemination of Internet interventions • Integration of Internet interventions into existing systems of care • Descriptions of development and deployment infrastructures • Internet intervention methodology and theory papers • Internet-based epidemiology • Descriptions of new Internet-based technologies and experiments with clinical applications • Economics of internet interventions (cost-effectiveness) • Health care policy and Internet interventions • The role of culture in Internet intervention • Internet psychometrics • Ethical issues pertaining to Internet interventions and measurements • Human-computer interaction and usability research with clinical implications • Systematic reviews and meta-analysis on Internet interventions
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of a guided multicomponent internet and mobile gratitude training program - A pragmatic randomized controlled trial Psychotherapy 2.0 - Application context and effectiveness of sensor technology in psychotherapy with children and adolescents: A systematic review Change processes in cognitive therapy for social anxiety disorder: A comparison of face-to-face and internet-based treatment formats Are there unique facets of therapeutic alliance for users of digital mental health interventions? An examination with the eHealth Therapeutic Alliance Inventory Predictors of participant compliance with ecological momentary assessment among individuals with chronic pain who are using cannabis and opioids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1