DNA and IQ: Big deal or much ado about nothing? – A meta-analysis

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2024.101871
Florence A.R. Oxley , Kirsty Wilding , Sophie von Stumm
{"title":"DNA and IQ: Big deal or much ado about nothing? – A meta-analysis","authors":"Florence A.R. Oxley ,&nbsp;Kirsty Wilding ,&nbsp;Sophie von Stumm","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2024.101871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intelligence is polygenic, highly heritable, and predicts wide-ranging life outcomes. Here, we meta-analysed the predictive validity of polygenic scores for intelligence based on the largest available genome-wide association study (or <em>GWAS</em>; Savage et al., 2018) for tested, phenotypic intelligence to date. Across 32 estimates from 9 independent samples, which all came from WEIRD countries and were of European ancestry (N<sub>total</sub> = 452,864), our meta-analytic estimate for the association between polygenic and phenotypic intelligence was <em>ρ</em> <em>=</em> <em>0</em>.245 (<em>p</em> <em>&lt;</em> .001, 95 % CI = 0.184–0.307), an effect of medium size. The meta-analytic estimate varied across samples, studies, and phenotypic measures of intelligence, and even after accounting for these moderators, polygenic score predictions remained significantly heterogenous. Our findings support claims that polygenic predictions of intelligence benefit and advance research but their utility in other contexts is yet to be demonstrated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 101871"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000655","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intelligence is polygenic, highly heritable, and predicts wide-ranging life outcomes. Here, we meta-analysed the predictive validity of polygenic scores for intelligence based on the largest available genome-wide association study (or GWAS; Savage et al., 2018) for tested, phenotypic intelligence to date. Across 32 estimates from 9 independent samples, which all came from WEIRD countries and were of European ancestry (Ntotal = 452,864), our meta-analytic estimate for the association between polygenic and phenotypic intelligence was ρ = 0.245 (p < .001, 95 % CI = 0.184–0.307), an effect of medium size. The meta-analytic estimate varied across samples, studies, and phenotypic measures of intelligence, and even after accounting for these moderators, polygenic score predictions remained significantly heterogenous. Our findings support claims that polygenic predictions of intelligence benefit and advance research but their utility in other contexts is yet to be demonstrated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DNA 和智商:大事还是小事?- 荟萃分析
智力是多基因的,具有高度遗传性,并能预测各种生活结果。在此,我们基于迄今为止最大的全基因组关联研究(或称 GWAS;Savage 等人,2018 年),对智力多基因评分的预测有效性进行了荟萃分析。来自9个独立样本的32个估计值均来自WEIRD国家,且均为欧洲血统(Ntotal = 452 864),我们对多基因与表型智力之间关联的元分析估计值为ρ = 0.245(p < .001,95 % CI = 0.184-0.307),属于中等规模效应。荟萃分析的估计值因样本、研究和智力表型测量而异,即使考虑了这些调节因素,多基因得分预测仍存在显著差异。我们的研究结果支持了多基因智力预测有利于和推动研究的说法,但它们在其他情况下的效用还有待证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence
Intelligence PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.
期刊最新文献
A special contribution from spatial ability to math word problem solving: Evidence from structural equation modelling and network analysis Occupation-related differences in cognitive aging: Comparative effects of job type, skill level, and education Investigating measurement invariance of the IDS-2 intelligence scales between migrant and non-migrant groups Investment theory and tilt: Evidence from jobs and job families DNA and IQ: Big deal or much ado about nothing? – A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1