Training and dashboard design: Impact on operator performance and mental workload for flight safety

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Safety Science Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106700
Kuang-Jou Chen , Jia-Jing Shin , Hsuan-Lin Chu , Yan-Lin Chen , Chih-Hsing Chu , Ying-Yin Huang , Yun-Ju Lee
{"title":"Training and dashboard design: Impact on operator performance and mental workload for flight safety","authors":"Kuang-Jou Chen ,&nbsp;Jia-Jing Shin ,&nbsp;Hsuan-Lin Chu ,&nbsp;Yan-Lin Chen ,&nbsp;Chih-Hsing Chu ,&nbsp;Ying-Yin Huang ,&nbsp;Yun-Ju Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pilot training, the design of flight instrument panels, and mental workload are essential elements for ensuring aviation safety. Prior studies on icon learning have shown that chunking techniques can improve understanding of icon-related information. The research explores the effects of different learning methods and instrument panel designs on learning. The study compares two types of panel layouts: a chunking layout and a long-scanning path layout. Thirty participants were enlisted and divided into two groups: one using the chunking method and a control group. The chunking group was trained to recognize instruments through functional grouping, whereas the control group received training in a random sequence. Both objective and subjective evaluations were used to assess the participants’ workload. Findings indicated that the chunking group was more efficient in visual search during training. However, the two groups had no notable differences in learning rates or NASA-TLX scores. The results support using chunking as a training strategy and an optimized panel layout to improve performance significantly. By integrating the proven benefits of chunking-based training and optimized panel layouts, the aviation industry could significantly enhance pilot efficiency and reduce mental workload, improving flight safety and operational effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 106700"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092575352400290X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pilot training, the design of flight instrument panels, and mental workload are essential elements for ensuring aviation safety. Prior studies on icon learning have shown that chunking techniques can improve understanding of icon-related information. The research explores the effects of different learning methods and instrument panel designs on learning. The study compares two types of panel layouts: a chunking layout and a long-scanning path layout. Thirty participants were enlisted and divided into two groups: one using the chunking method and a control group. The chunking group was trained to recognize instruments through functional grouping, whereas the control group received training in a random sequence. Both objective and subjective evaluations were used to assess the participants’ workload. Findings indicated that the chunking group was more efficient in visual search during training. However, the two groups had no notable differences in learning rates or NASA-TLX scores. The results support using chunking as a training strategy and an optimized panel layout to improve performance significantly. By integrating the proven benefits of chunking-based training and optimized panel layouts, the aviation industry could significantly enhance pilot efficiency and reduce mental workload, improving flight safety and operational effectiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培训和仪表板设计:对操作员绩效和飞行安全心理工作量的影响
飞行员培训、飞行仪表板的设计和心理负荷是确保航空安全的基本要素。之前关于图标学习的研究表明,分块技术可以提高对图标相关信息的理解。本研究探讨了不同学习方法和仪表板设计对学习的影响。研究比较了两种面板布局:分块布局和长扫描路径布局。研究人员招募了 30 名参与者,并将其分为两组:一组采用分块法,另一组为对照组。分块法组通过功能分组训练识别仪器,而对照组则接受随机序列训练。客观和主观评价都被用来评估参与者的工作量。结果表明,在训练过程中,分块组的视觉搜索效率更高。不过,两组在学习率或 NASA-TLX 分数上没有明显差异。研究结果支持将分块作为一种训练策略,并通过优化面板布局来显著提高成绩。通过整合基于分块的培训和优化的面板布局已被证实的优点,航空业可以显著提高飞行员的效率,减少脑力劳动负荷,从而提高飞行安全和运行效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
The effect of the Labour Inspection Authority’s regulatory tools on compliance with regulations in the Norwegian home care services – A post-test-only control group study A novel methodology for quantifying the impact of dependent competing failure-induced performance degradation of fireproofing coatings on domino effect risk Editorial Board A systematic review of hazard recognition and risk perception research in the construction industry Investigating the predictive validity of subjective and objective measures for general aviation pilots’ risk propensity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1