Incidental vocabulary learning: A scientometric review

Sofiya Shahiwala , D. R. Rahul , John R. Baker
{"title":"Incidental vocabulary learning: A scientometric review","authors":"Sofiya Shahiwala ,&nbsp;D. R. Rahul ,&nbsp;John R. Baker","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on incidental vocabulary learning has gained increasing attention in language acquisition. With growing empirical evidence, traditional reviews have attempted to provide incidental vocabulary learning narrative and summary effects. However, a detailed analysis of publication trends and their dynamics is necessary to comprehensively understand the field's developments. Consequently, a scientometric review was conducted using 547 journal articles published between 2003 and 2023 from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The analysis explored developments through three lenses: performance, document co-citation, and structural variation. Through performance analysis, prominent journals, affiliate universities, and authors who increasingly contributed to the field were identified. The document co-citation analysis revealed several major clusters, of which the top six were scrutinised. Findings highlighted recurrent themes such as the importance of topic familiarity, glosses, and input modality. Moreover, influential articles and their linkages were evaluated through structural variation analysis, and their key findings and citation bursts revealed frontier trends. Finally, limitations in empirical data were discussed to elicit future research directions. As an early attempt at a scientometric analysis of incidental vocabulary acquisition, these findings will be highly beneficial to language researchers, teachers, and teacher educators, not only for identifying potential research areas but also for adapting strategies for vocabulary instruction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766124000661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on incidental vocabulary learning has gained increasing attention in language acquisition. With growing empirical evidence, traditional reviews have attempted to provide incidental vocabulary learning narrative and summary effects. However, a detailed analysis of publication trends and their dynamics is necessary to comprehensively understand the field's developments. Consequently, a scientometric review was conducted using 547 journal articles published between 2003 and 2023 from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The analysis explored developments through three lenses: performance, document co-citation, and structural variation. Through performance analysis, prominent journals, affiliate universities, and authors who increasingly contributed to the field were identified. The document co-citation analysis revealed several major clusters, of which the top six were scrutinised. Findings highlighted recurrent themes such as the importance of topic familiarity, glosses, and input modality. Moreover, influential articles and their linkages were evaluated through structural variation analysis, and their key findings and citation bursts revealed frontier trends. Finally, limitations in empirical data were discussed to elicit future research directions. As an early attempt at a scientometric analysis of incidental vocabulary acquisition, these findings will be highly beneficial to language researchers, teachers, and teacher educators, not only for identifying potential research areas but also for adapting strategies for vocabulary instruction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
偶然词汇学习:科学计量学回顾
在语言习得领域,有关附带词汇学习的研究越来越受到关注。随着经验证据的不断增加,传统的综述试图提供附带词汇学习的叙述和总结效果。然而,为了全面了解该领域的发展,有必要对论文发表趋势及其动态进行详细分析。因此,我们利用科学网和 Scopus 数据库中 2003 年至 2023 年间发表的 547 篇期刊论文进行了科学计量学回顾。分析从三个角度探讨了该领域的发展:绩效、文献共引和结构变异。通过绩效分析,确定了对该领域贡献越来越大的著名期刊、附属大学和作者。文献共引分析揭示了几个主要群组,并对其中前六个群组进行了仔细研究。研究结果突出了一些重复出现的主题,如主题熟悉度、词汇和输入模式的重要性。此外,还通过结构变异分析对有影响力的文章及其联系进行了评估,这些文章的主要发现和被引频次揭示了前沿趋势。最后,对实证数据的局限性进行了讨论,以引出未来的研究方向。作为对附带词汇习得进行科学计量分析的早期尝试,这些发现将对语言研究人员、教师和教师教育者大有裨益,不仅有助于确定潜在的研究领域,还有助于调整词汇教学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Toward ethical praxis in longitudinal research with children: Reflecting on ethical tensions in participatory research A conversation analysis-complex dynamics systems theory (CA-CDST) approach for analyzing longitudinal development in L2 pragmatics Categorising speakers’ language background: Theoretical assumptions and methodological challenges for learner corpus research Data from role plays and elicited conversations: What do they show about L2 interactional competence?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1