Per Øivind Braarud , Jinkyun Park , Jitae Kim , Johnny Short
{"title":"Human factors validation of complex human-technology systems – Need for updating the technical basis and improving the guides and standards","authors":"Per Øivind Braarud , Jinkyun Park , Jitae Kim , Johnny Short","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human Factors validation is a critical step in the design and development of complex human-technology systems such as nuclear power plants. Unfortunately, frequent validation challenges are reported by designers, vendors, and authorities, and this presents challenges when determining the acceptability of system design due to inefficient test scenarios, and inadequate human performance measures. This means that whilst existing guides and standards attempt to provide technical advice and a common basis for different stakeholders, validation teams continue to report limitations in the levels of support provided. This paper discusses a number of these human factors validation challenges and makes recommendations for future research to improve the technical basis of guides and standards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 106697"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092575352400287X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Human Factors validation is a critical step in the design and development of complex human-technology systems such as nuclear power plants. Unfortunately, frequent validation challenges are reported by designers, vendors, and authorities, and this presents challenges when determining the acceptability of system design due to inefficient test scenarios, and inadequate human performance measures. This means that whilst existing guides and standards attempt to provide technical advice and a common basis for different stakeholders, validation teams continue to report limitations in the levels of support provided. This paper discusses a number of these human factors validation challenges and makes recommendations for future research to improve the technical basis of guides and standards.
期刊介绍:
Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.