Numerical simulation on in-situ loading tests of composite foundation composed of soilbags, piles and footing

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-20 DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109035
Tatsuya Doi , Yoshitaka Murono , Feng Zhang
{"title":"Numerical simulation on in-situ loading tests of composite foundation composed of soilbags, piles and footing","authors":"Tatsuya Doi ,&nbsp;Yoshitaka Murono ,&nbsp;Feng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The authors have been developing a new composite foundation composed of soilbags, piles and footing, hereafter called as proposed composite foundation (PCF). PCF is characterized by laying soilbags between the pile heads and the footing. The expected effects of PCF are to reduce the bending moment of the piles and the response acceleration of the pier during earthquakes by cutting off the fixed connection between the piles and the footing. To apply PCF to practical use, it is necessary to confirm the validity of the numerical analysis model of PCF through comparison with the seismic behavior of the entire system of PCF confirmed by the previous in-situ loading tests. In this study, therefore, FEM analysis based on rational elastoplastic model was conducted to reproduce the in-situ loading tests, and the numerical model was verified by comparing the calculation results to the test results. Furthermore, since it is not always easy to conduct sophisticated elastoplastic FEM analysis in practical engineering, a simplified numerical method is proposed, and its applicability was examined by comparing to the test results and the elastoplastic FEM analysis results. The results showed that, although not all the results of the in-situ loading tests could be explained, the proposed simplified method could generally explain the test results and was useful for the practical engineering of the newly proposed PCF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 109035"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726124005876","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors have been developing a new composite foundation composed of soilbags, piles and footing, hereafter called as proposed composite foundation (PCF). PCF is characterized by laying soilbags between the pile heads and the footing. The expected effects of PCF are to reduce the bending moment of the piles and the response acceleration of the pier during earthquakes by cutting off the fixed connection between the piles and the footing. To apply PCF to practical use, it is necessary to confirm the validity of the numerical analysis model of PCF through comparison with the seismic behavior of the entire system of PCF confirmed by the previous in-situ loading tests. In this study, therefore, FEM analysis based on rational elastoplastic model was conducted to reproduce the in-situ loading tests, and the numerical model was verified by comparing the calculation results to the test results. Furthermore, since it is not always easy to conduct sophisticated elastoplastic FEM analysis in practical engineering, a simplified numerical method is proposed, and its applicability was examined by comparing to the test results and the elastoplastic FEM analysis results. The results showed that, although not all the results of the in-situ loading tests could be explained, the proposed simplified method could generally explain the test results and was useful for the practical engineering of the newly proposed PCF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土袋、桩和基脚组成的复合地基原位加载试验的数值模拟
作者一直在开发一种由土袋、桩和基脚组成的新型复合地基,以下称为拟议复合地基(PCF)。PCF 的特点是在桩头和基脚之间铺设土袋。PCF 的预期效果是通过切断桩与基脚之间的固定连接,减少地震时桩的弯矩和墩的响应加速度。要将 PCF 应用于实际工程,有必要通过与之前原位加载试验确认的 PCF 整个系统的地震行为进行比较,以确认 PCF 数值分析模型的有效性。因此,本研究基于合理弹塑性模型进行有限元分析,以重现原位加载试验,并通过比较计算结果和试验结果来验证数值模型。此外,由于在实际工程中进行复杂的弹塑性有限元分析并非易事,因此提出了一种简化的数值方法,并通过将试验结果与弹塑性有限元分析结果进行比较,检验了该方法的适用性。结果表明,虽然并非所有的原位加载试验结果都能得到解释,但所提出的简化方法总体上可以解释试验结果,对新提出的 PCF 的实际工程非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
期刊最新文献
Experimental study on the reliquefaction behavior of saturated sand deposits under distinct loading frequencies Numerical investigation on failure modes and TDA-based mitigation measure of jointed rigid pipes under ground subsidence Experimental seismic behavior of novel inorganic-bonded bamboo composite beam-to-column moment-resisting connections Evaluation of volumetric threshold shear strain of gravel-sand mixtures in centrifuge model tests Seismic response of monopile offshore wind turbines in liquefiable sand considering vertical ground motion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1