Elaborating decent work for agriculture: Job experiences and workforce retention in the Australian orchard industry

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Rural Studies Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103330
Michael Santhanam-Martin , Roger Wilkinson , Lisa Cowan , Ruth Nettle
{"title":"Elaborating decent work for agriculture: Job experiences and workforce retention in the Australian orchard industry","authors":"Michael Santhanam-Martin ,&nbsp;Roger Wilkinson ,&nbsp;Lisa Cowan ,&nbsp;Ruth Nettle","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is growing policy and research interest in the quality or attractiveness of farm jobs, driven by both the deepening problem of agricultural workforce shortages worldwide, and by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal of achieving “decent work for all” by 2030. Our contribution to this work is a case study of fifty-seven waged workers' experiences of their jobs in the orchard industry in the Australian state of Victoria. Our quantitative survey research used psychological contract theory as a framework for exploring what aspects of people's job experiences contribute most to their job satisfaction and intention to stay in agricultural employment. We also mapped these findings to the domains of the International Labour Organization's decent work concept, to examine the extent to which the decent work concept can provide useful guidance for policy and practice to address workforce challenges in industrialised country agriculture. We found that satisfying employees' expectations in relation to “Safety and security”, “Enabling good work” and “Training and opportunity” had the biggest influence on their intention to continue their employment. While the first of these is captured by the decent work domains, the latter two are not. This suggests that the decent work concept on its own does not fully account for aspects of the employment relationship that are important for worker retention, and for human flourishing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 103330"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724001347","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is growing policy and research interest in the quality or attractiveness of farm jobs, driven by both the deepening problem of agricultural workforce shortages worldwide, and by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal of achieving “decent work for all” by 2030. Our contribution to this work is a case study of fifty-seven waged workers' experiences of their jobs in the orchard industry in the Australian state of Victoria. Our quantitative survey research used psychological contract theory as a framework for exploring what aspects of people's job experiences contribute most to their job satisfaction and intention to stay in agricultural employment. We also mapped these findings to the domains of the International Labour Organization's decent work concept, to examine the extent to which the decent work concept can provide useful guidance for policy and practice to address workforce challenges in industrialised country agriculture. We found that satisfying employees' expectations in relation to “Safety and security”, “Enabling good work” and “Training and opportunity” had the biggest influence on their intention to continue their employment. While the first of these is captured by the decent work domains, the latter two are not. This suggests that the decent work concept on its own does not fully account for aspects of the employment relationship that are important for worker retention, and for human flourishing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为农业制定体面工作:澳大利亚果园业的工作经验和劳动力保留情况
全球农业劳动力短缺问题日益严重,联合国可持续发展目标提出到 2030 年实现 "人人享有体面工作",在此推动下,人们对农场工作质量或吸引力的政策和研究兴趣与日俱增。我们对这项工作的贡献在于,我们对澳大利亚维多利亚州果园行业 57 名工薪工人的工作经历进行了案例研究。我们的定量调查研究以心理契约理论为框架,探讨了人们的工作经历中哪些方面最有助于提高他们的工作满意度和继续从事农业工作的意愿。我们还将这些研究结果与国际劳工组织体面工作概念的各个领域进行了对比,以研究体面工作概念在多大程度上能够为政策和实践提供有用的指导,从而应对工业化国家农业劳动力面临的挑战。我们发现,满足员工在 "安全与保障"、"创造良好工作条件 "和 "培训与机会 "方面的期望对他们继续就业的意愿影响最大。体面工作领域涵盖了前者,而后两者却没有。这表明,体面工作概念本身并没有充分考虑到雇佣关系中对工人留任和人类繁荣十分重要的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
期刊最新文献
Creative assets, people, and places: Rural art action practices of US nonprofit organizations "ICI ON TRAVAILLE: The role of cooperatives in structuring social relations of production in artisanal and small-scale gold mining in Eastern DRC Spatial-temporal patterns and driving mechanism of rural vulneraiblity at county level:A case study of 117 counties in Heilongjiang Province, China The Change towards the Integration of Agri-environmental Practices (CIAEP) into farmer’s practices system: An affective, cognitive, and behavioural process “They just get on with it”: How innovating firms in a rural region navigate issues of market access
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1