Beyond the Scroll: Exploring How Intolerance of Uncertainty and Psychological Resilience Explain the Association Between Trait Anxiety and Doomscrolling

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112919
Tuğba Türk-Kurtça , Metin Kocatürk
{"title":"Beyond the Scroll: Exploring How Intolerance of Uncertainty and Psychological Resilience Explain the Association Between Trait Anxiety and Doomscrolling","authors":"Tuğba Türk-Kurtça ,&nbsp;Metin Kocatürk","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the relationship between “doomscrolling”—the habit of consuming continuous negative news—and trait anxiety, while considering the explanatory role of psychological resilience and intolerance of uncertainty. With constant connectivity and information overload in the digital age, doomscrolling has raised concerns about its potential to heighten anxiety. The study examines 443 participants (79.9 % female, 20.1 % male, average age 23.49 years) using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to assess the connections between the variables.</div><div>Key findings reveal that trait anxiety significantly predicts intolerance of uncertainty (β = 0.50, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and is negatively linked to psychological resilience (β = −0.19, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). Intolerance of uncertainty is negatively correlated with psychological resilience (β = −0.42, p &lt; .001) and positively associated with doomscrolling (β = 0.29, p &lt; .001). Psychological resilience acts as a protective factor, negatively associated with doomscrolling (β = −0.12, <em>p</em> &lt; .05). Additionally, both psychological resilience and intolerance of uncertainty explain the relationship between trait anxiety and doomscrolling (β = 0.193, p &lt; .05). These results provide insights into how intolerance of uncertainty and psychological resilience influence the connection between anxiety and doomscrolling, suggesting intervention opportunities in an anxiety-inducing digital world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 112919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003799","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between “doomscrolling”—the habit of consuming continuous negative news—and trait anxiety, while considering the explanatory role of psychological resilience and intolerance of uncertainty. With constant connectivity and information overload in the digital age, doomscrolling has raised concerns about its potential to heighten anxiety. The study examines 443 participants (79.9 % female, 20.1 % male, average age 23.49 years) using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to assess the connections between the variables.
Key findings reveal that trait anxiety significantly predicts intolerance of uncertainty (β = 0.50, p < .001) and is negatively linked to psychological resilience (β = −0.19, p < .001). Intolerance of uncertainty is negatively correlated with psychological resilience (β = −0.42, p < .001) and positively associated with doomscrolling (β = 0.29, p < .001). Psychological resilience acts as a protective factor, negatively associated with doomscrolling (β = −0.12, p < .05). Additionally, both psychological resilience and intolerance of uncertainty explain the relationship between trait anxiety and doomscrolling (β = 0.193, p < .05). These results provide insights into how intolerance of uncertainty and psychological resilience influence the connection between anxiety and doomscrolling, suggesting intervention opportunities in an anxiety-inducing digital world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越卷轴:探索不确定性的不耐受性和心理复原力如何解释特质焦虑与末日滚动之间的关联
本研究探讨了 "doomscrolling"--持续浏览负面新闻的习惯--与特质焦虑之间的关系,同时考虑了心理复原力和对不确定性的不容忍度的解释作用。随着数字时代的不断连接和信息超载,"末日滚动 "引发了人们对其可能加剧焦虑的担忧。研究使用结构方程模型(SEM)对 443 名参与者(79.9% 为女性,20.1% 为男性,平均年龄 23.49 岁)进行了调查,以评估变量之间的联系。主要结果显示,特质焦虑可显著预测对不确定性的不容忍度(β = 0.50,p < .001),并与心理复原力呈负相关(β = -0.19,p < .001)。对不确定性的不容忍度与心理复原力呈负相关(β = -0.42,p < .001),与末日滚动呈正相关(β = 0.29,p < .001)。心理复原力是一个保护因素,与末日滚动呈负相关(β = -0.12,p < .05)。此外,心理复原力和对不确定性的不容忍度都能解释特质焦虑与末日滚动之间的关系(β = 0.193,p < .05)。这些结果提供了对不确定性不容忍度和心理复原力如何影响焦虑与末日滚动之间的联系的见解,为在令人焦虑的数字世界中进行干预提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
The Golden Mean Inventory: A new approach to studying character strengths imbalances across contexts Inside Front Cover - Ed. Board, Aims and Scope, Copyright, Publication information, Orders and Claims, Advertising information, Author inquiries, Permissions, Funding body, Permanence of paper, Impressum (German titles only) and GFA link in double column ISSID Pages The number of exceptional people: Fewer than 85 per 1 million across key traits Priming moral self-ambivalence facilitates cognitive flexibility in young adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1