Perspectives on access to imaging digital health records in oncology: A mixed methods systematic review

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Policy and Technology Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100915
Ana S.F. Ribeiro , Olga Husson , Milou Reuvers , Wim J.G. Oyen , Christina Messiou , Winette T.A. van der Graaf
{"title":"Perspectives on access to imaging digital health records in oncology: A mixed methods systematic review","authors":"Ana S.F. Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Olga Husson ,&nbsp;Milou Reuvers ,&nbsp;Wim J.G. Oyen ,&nbsp;Christina Messiou ,&nbsp;Winette T.A. van der Graaf","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Digital Health Records (DHR) have become essential for managing patient data, including radiology and nuclear medicine reports. The wider adoption of DHR globally presents an opportunity to improve patient engagement and empowerment through effective access and sharing of imaging investigations. This review aims to synthesize literature on views, experiences, expectations, and preferences of oncology patients and healthcare professionals (HCP) when accessing imaging via DHR.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This review was conducted using recommended Cochrane Handbook databases (registration: CRD42021213808), focusing on English articles published from 2000 onwards. Three experienced reviewers critically appraised selected articles, thematic analysis and narrative synthesis were used to extract data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>493 unique articles were identified, with 451 excluded, resulting in 42 articles assessed for eligibility. Nine studies were included, eight from the USA, one from Canada, published between 2010 and 2020. Findings suggest patient portals can positively impact patient and HCP engagement, and patients desire access to their imaging reports. Factors such as timing of access, adequate consultation time, resources for HCP to discuss findings, and format of information are critical considerations that influence both patient and HCP perceptions and preferences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Oncology patients want timely and understandable access to their imaging records. To ensure this, it is crucial to explore the appropriate timing, format, and methods to discuss these findings with patients. By involving all stakeholders in the planning process, we can develop DHR systems that provide personalised support for patients to manage their complex imaging results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 5","pages":"Article 100915"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000789","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Digital Health Records (DHR) have become essential for managing patient data, including radiology and nuclear medicine reports. The wider adoption of DHR globally presents an opportunity to improve patient engagement and empowerment through effective access and sharing of imaging investigations. This review aims to synthesize literature on views, experiences, expectations, and preferences of oncology patients and healthcare professionals (HCP) when accessing imaging via DHR.

Materials and Methods

This review was conducted using recommended Cochrane Handbook databases (registration: CRD42021213808), focusing on English articles published from 2000 onwards. Three experienced reviewers critically appraised selected articles, thematic analysis and narrative synthesis were used to extract data.

Results

493 unique articles were identified, with 451 excluded, resulting in 42 articles assessed for eligibility. Nine studies were included, eight from the USA, one from Canada, published between 2010 and 2020. Findings suggest patient portals can positively impact patient and HCP engagement, and patients desire access to their imaging reports. Factors such as timing of access, adequate consultation time, resources for HCP to discuss findings, and format of information are critical considerations that influence both patient and HCP perceptions and preferences.

Conclusion

Oncology patients want timely and understandable access to their imaging records. To ensure this, it is crucial to explore the appropriate timing, format, and methods to discuss these findings with patients. By involving all stakeholders in the planning process, we can develop DHR systems that provide personalised support for patients to manage their complex imaging results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于获取肿瘤学影像数字健康记录的观点:混合方法系统综述
背景数字健康记录(DHR)已成为管理患者数据(包括放射学和核医学报告)的关键。数字健康记录在全球范围内的广泛应用为通过有效获取和共享影像检查结果来提高患者参与度和能力提供了机会。本综述旨在综合肿瘤患者和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)在通过 DHR 获取影像资料时的观点、经验、期望和偏好等方面的文献。材料与方法本综述使用推荐的 Cochrane 手册数据库(注册号:CRD42021213808)进行,重点关注 2000 年以来发表的英文文章。三位经验丰富的审稿人对所选文章进行了严格评审,并采用专题分析和叙事综合法提取数据。结果共识别出 493 篇文章,其中 451 篇被排除在外,最终有 42 篇文章通过了资格评估。共纳入 9 项研究,其中 8 项来自美国,1 项来自加拿大,研究发表于 2010 年至 2020 年之间。研究结果表明,患者门户网站能对患者和医疗保健人员的参与产生积极影响,患者希望能访问他们的成像报告。访问时间、充足的咨询时间、医疗保健人员讨论结果的资源以及信息格式等因素都是影响患者和医疗保健人员看法和偏好的关键因素。为确保这一点,探索与患者讨论这些结果的适当时机、形式和方法至关重要。通过让所有利益相关者参与规划过程,我们可以开发出能为患者提供个性化支持的 DHR 系统,帮助他们管理复杂的影像结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
期刊最新文献
Challenges of shared decision-making in virtual care: Whom should we care for, and how? Individual factors that affect laypeople's understanding of definitions of medical jargon An insight into the implementation, utilization, and evaluation of telemedicine e-consultation services in Egypt Multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework “MARIE” for new drugs Assessing contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on healthcare provider burnout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1