Thinking beyond models: The propensity to fly of four Central European countries

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Transport Geography Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104040
Antonín Kazda , Alena Novák Sedláčková , Patrik Böhm , Matúš Materna
{"title":"Thinking beyond models: The propensity to fly of four Central European countries","authors":"Antonín Kazda ,&nbsp;Alena Novák Sedláčková ,&nbsp;Patrik Böhm ,&nbsp;Matúš Materna","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper proposes a new enhanced propensity to fly model based on multilinear regression analysis, which is used to analyse the air transport market potential in four central European countries. Eurostat database data from 31 European states in years 2009–2019 were used with an emphasis on data homogeneity and robustness. To evaluate the quality of the regression model, the influence of seven variables was considered in total on propensity to fly – GDP, geographical characteristics of states (3 variables), magnitude of tourism, the effect of economically active people of working age, and education. The multi-regression analysis findings show differences between the theoretical and actual values in the examined states. In all four investigated states, the theoretical values predicted by the regression model are higher than the actual numbers. In the Czech Republic and Slovakia, these differences are substantially larger than in the other two countries. This may indicate that a proportion of air passengers from the Czech Republic and Slovakia choose airports in other countries for their travel. The article discusses the causes and consequences of the mentioned differences. The proposed enhanced propensity to fly method can help decision-makers assess the scale of ‘air passenger leakage’ from the four countries of the Central Europe to airports abroad. It could serve as one of the tools to inform the design and/or review of air transport policies. However, while the model is statistically strong and reliable, it remains a ‘crude tool’ and should be used in conjunction with other data by air transport planners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 104040"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692324002497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper proposes a new enhanced propensity to fly model based on multilinear regression analysis, which is used to analyse the air transport market potential in four central European countries. Eurostat database data from 31 European states in years 2009–2019 were used with an emphasis on data homogeneity and robustness. To evaluate the quality of the regression model, the influence of seven variables was considered in total on propensity to fly – GDP, geographical characteristics of states (3 variables), magnitude of tourism, the effect of economically active people of working age, and education. The multi-regression analysis findings show differences between the theoretical and actual values in the examined states. In all four investigated states, the theoretical values predicted by the regression model are higher than the actual numbers. In the Czech Republic and Slovakia, these differences are substantially larger than in the other two countries. This may indicate that a proportion of air passengers from the Czech Republic and Slovakia choose airports in other countries for their travel. The article discusses the causes and consequences of the mentioned differences. The proposed enhanced propensity to fly method can help decision-makers assess the scale of ‘air passenger leakage’ from the four countries of the Central Europe to airports abroad. It could serve as one of the tools to inform the design and/or review of air transport policies. However, while the model is statistically strong and reliable, it remains a ‘crude tool’ and should be used in conjunction with other data by air transport planners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越模型的思考:四个中欧国家的飞行倾向
本文提出了一种基于多元线性回归分析的新的增强型飞行倾向模型,用于分析四个中欧国家的航空运输市场潜力。本文使用了欧洲 31 个国家 2009-2019 年的欧盟统计局数据库数据,并强调了数据的同质性和稳健性。为评估回归模型的质量,共考虑了七个变量对飞行倾向的影响--国内生产总值、国家地理特征(3 个变量)、旅游业规模、工作年龄段经济活跃人口的影响以及教育程度。多元回归分析结果表明,理论值与实际值之间存在差异。在所调查的四个州中,回归模型预测的理论值均高于实际值。在捷克共和国和斯洛伐克,这些差异远远大于其他两个国家。这可能表明,捷克共和国和斯洛伐克的部分航空旅客选择了其他国家的机场进行旅行。文章讨论了上述差异的原因和后果。所建议的增强飞行倾向法可帮助决策者评估从中欧四国到国外机场的 "航空旅客流失 "规模。它可以作为设计和/或审查航空运输政策的工具之一。然而,尽管该模型在统计上是强大和可靠的,但它仍然是一个 "粗糙的工具",航空运输规划者应将其与其他数据结合起来使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
期刊最新文献
Exploring spatiotemporal characteristics of ride-hailing ridership connecting with metro stations: A comparative analysis of holidays, weekdays, and weekends Exploring biases in travel behavior patterns in big passively generated mobile data from 11 U.S. cities Liquefied natural gas trade network changes and its mechanism in the context of the Russia–Ukraine conflict Spatial inferences of visually impaired individuals concerning wayfinding: a case study of Istanbul’s Kadikoy area Comparing accessibility to high-speed rail stations by public transit and cars: A national-scale analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1