Comparison of the effectiveness of treatments based on compassion, acceptance and commitment, and mindfulness on anxiety disorders and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nader Salari , Pegah Heidarian , Roya Hassani , Fateme Babajani , Amir Abdolmaleki , Masoud Mohammadi
{"title":"Comparison of the effectiveness of treatments based on compassion, acceptance and commitment, and mindfulness on anxiety disorders and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Nader Salari ,&nbsp;Pegah Heidarian ,&nbsp;Roya Hassani ,&nbsp;Fateme Babajani ,&nbsp;Amir Abdolmaleki ,&nbsp;Masoud Mohammadi","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recently, anxiety and depression disorders have spread among different societies and have had unpleasant effects on people involved with the disease and societies, so the treatment of these disorders should be prioritized. In recent years, the use of various psychotherapy methods, such as acceptance and commitment-based therapies (ACT), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), and compassion-based therapy (CFT) for the treatment of many disorders related to mental illness have been noticed. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of compassion-based therapy, acceptance and commitment-based therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on anxiety and depression disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study, the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar search engines were systematically searched for studies that show the effectiveness of compassion-based interventions, acceptance and commitment-based therapy, and mind-based cognitive therapy. Reports of awareness up to May 2023 were searched. Random effects model was used to perform the analysis. Data analysis based on the mean and standard deviation of anxiety disorders or depression before and after the intervention separately and Also, the difference between the mean before and after the intervention was done, the heterogeneity of the studies was investigated using the I<sup>2</sup> test and the publication bias was investigated using Egger's test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After the search, 3433 studies were obtained from 6 research repositories, which left 1969 studies after removing duplicate studies. After the primary and secondary review, 1876 other studies were excluded from the study, and finally 93 studies remained and the information obtained from them was used in this study. On this basis, it was proved that all three interventions, MBCT, ACT and CFT, are effective in reducing the symptoms of depression and anxiety disorders, but the greatest effect on reducing the symptoms of depression and anxiety disorders was observed in ACT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Considering the positive effect of ACT, MBCT and CFT in reducing the symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression, therapists can use these treatment methods as less expensive and uncomplicated treatment methods to improve the condition of patients with such disorders. order to reduce treatment costs for communities and people involved with this category of disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100847"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Recently, anxiety and depression disorders have spread among different societies and have had unpleasant effects on people involved with the disease and societies, so the treatment of these disorders should be prioritized. In recent years, the use of various psychotherapy methods, such as acceptance and commitment-based therapies (ACT), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), and compassion-based therapy (CFT) for the treatment of many disorders related to mental illness have been noticed. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of compassion-based therapy, acceptance and commitment-based therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on anxiety and depression disorders.

Methods

In this study, the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar search engines were systematically searched for studies that show the effectiveness of compassion-based interventions, acceptance and commitment-based therapy, and mind-based cognitive therapy. Reports of awareness up to May 2023 were searched. Random effects model was used to perform the analysis. Data analysis based on the mean and standard deviation of anxiety disorders or depression before and after the intervention separately and Also, the difference between the mean before and after the intervention was done, the heterogeneity of the studies was investigated using the I2 test and the publication bias was investigated using Egger's test.

Results

After the search, 3433 studies were obtained from 6 research repositories, which left 1969 studies after removing duplicate studies. After the primary and secondary review, 1876 other studies were excluded from the study, and finally 93 studies remained and the information obtained from them was used in this study. On this basis, it was proved that all three interventions, MBCT, ACT and CFT, are effective in reducing the symptoms of depression and anxiety disorders, but the greatest effect on reducing the symptoms of depression and anxiety disorders was observed in ACT.

Conclusion

Considering the positive effect of ACT, MBCT and CFT in reducing the symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression, therapists can use these treatment methods as less expensive and uncomplicated treatment methods to improve the condition of patients with such disorders. order to reduce treatment costs for communities and people involved with this category of disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较基于同情、接纳和承诺以及正念的治疗方法对焦虑症和抑郁症的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景最近,焦虑症和抑郁症在不同的社会中蔓延,给患者和社会带来了不愉快的影响,因此这些疾病的治疗应优先考虑。近年来,各种心理治疗方法,如接受和承诺疗法(ACT)、正念认知疗法(MBCT)和同情疗法(CFT)被用于治疗许多与精神疾病有关的障碍,受到人们的关注。因此,本研究的目的是比较基于同情的疗法、基于接受和承诺的疗法以及基于正念的认知疗法对焦虑症和抑郁症的疗效。方法在本研究中,系统地检索了电子数据库PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase、ScienceDirect和Google Scholar搜索引擎中显示基于同情的干预、基于接受和承诺的疗法以及基于正念的认知疗法疗效的研究。搜索了截至 2023 年 5 月的认知报告。采用随机效应模型进行分析。根据干预前后焦虑症或抑郁症的平均值和标准差分别进行数据分析,同时分析干预前后平均值的差异,使用 I2 检验调查研究的异质性,使用 Egger 检验调查发表偏倚。经过初审和复审,本研究排除了 1876 项其他研究,最后剩下 93 项研究,本研究采用了从这些研究中获得的信息。结论考虑到 ACT、MBCT 和 CFT 在减少焦虑症和抑郁症状方面的积极作用,治疗师可将这些治疗方法作为费用较低、不复杂的治疗方法,以改善这类疾病患者的状况,从而降低社区和这类疾病患者的治疗费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Mature brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in serum correlate with symptom severity in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Disentangling the relationships of health-related quality of life, depressive symptoms, disability and social support after stroke: A network analysis Implementing group therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder within a primary care setting: A pilot study Developing and validating the Sierra Leone perinatal psychological distress scale through an emic-etic approach Examining concurrent and longitudinal associations between quality of interpersonal relations and depressive symptoms among young adults in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1