James C. Coons , Jennifer Kliner , Michael A. Mathier , Suresh Mulukutla , Floyd Thoma , Ahmet Sezer , Mary Keebler
{"title":"Medication optimization clinic decreases hospitalizations and mortality for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction","authors":"James C. Coons , Jennifer Kliner , Michael A. Mathier , Suresh Mulukutla , Floyd Thoma , Ahmet Sezer , Mary Keebler","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of a medication optimization clinic (MOC) on GDMT and outcomes for patients with HFrEF versus usual care.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective evaluation of a multi-site MOC was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Large health system with academic and community hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Patients with HFrEF referred to MOC by their cardiologist versus usual care.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>GDMT use managed by an advanced practice provider or clinical pharmacist through weekly telemedicine visits.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>The primary outcome was HF hospitalization. Cardiovascular hospitalization and all-cause mortality were also assessed. Kaplan−Meier Curve, Cumulative Incidence Function, and competing risk analysis with regression models were conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1419 patients in MOC group were compared to 5116 control patients. GDMT use was significantly higher in MOC: quadruple therapy (49 % vs. 19 %; p < 0.0001), angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor (62 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.0001), beta blocker (92 % vs. 88 %; p < 0.0001), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (69 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.0001), and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (68 % vs. 35 %; p < 0.0001). Competing risk analyses showed that HF and CV hospitalizations were significantly lower at all times points (3, 6, and 12 months) for MOC vs. control (p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly lower at 6 months (p = 0.006) and 12 months (p < 0.001), but did not differ at 3 months (p = 0.35), for MOC vs. control.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MOC was associated with improved GDMT and lower risks of hospitalizations due to HF and any cardiovascular cause, and all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224001137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objective
To evaluate the impact of a medication optimization clinic (MOC) on GDMT and outcomes for patients with HFrEF versus usual care.
Design
Retrospective evaluation of a multi-site MOC was conducted.
Setting
Large health system with academic and community hospitals.
Participants
Patients with HFrEF referred to MOC by their cardiologist versus usual care.
Interventions
GDMT use managed by an advanced practice provider or clinical pharmacist through weekly telemedicine visits.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was HF hospitalization. Cardiovascular hospitalization and all-cause mortality were also assessed. Kaplan−Meier Curve, Cumulative Incidence Function, and competing risk analysis with regression models were conducted.
Results
1419 patients in MOC group were compared to 5116 control patients. GDMT use was significantly higher in MOC: quadruple therapy (49 % vs. 19 %; p < 0.0001), angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor (62 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.0001), beta blocker (92 % vs. 88 %; p < 0.0001), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (69 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.0001), and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (68 % vs. 35 %; p < 0.0001). Competing risk analyses showed that HF and CV hospitalizations were significantly lower at all times points (3, 6, and 12 months) for MOC vs. control (p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly lower at 6 months (p = 0.006) and 12 months (p < 0.001), but did not differ at 3 months (p = 0.35), for MOC vs. control.
Conclusions
MOC was associated with improved GDMT and lower risks of hospitalizations due to HF and any cardiovascular cause, and all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF.