International experiences on active travel planning: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic

Yuting Zhang , Jennifer Kent , Patrick Harris , John D Nelson , Michael Tong , Sotiris Vardoulakis
{"title":"International experiences on active travel planning: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Yuting Zhang ,&nbsp;Jennifer Kent ,&nbsp;Patrick Harris ,&nbsp;John D Nelson ,&nbsp;Michael Tong ,&nbsp;Sotiris Vardoulakis","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic generated significant impacts on transport policy. Exploring barriers and enablers to active travel through the lens of the practitioners planning for and promoting its uptake can uncover underlying mechanisms that shape travel choices and encourage more effective interventions. This study uses online survey data from practitioners working in the planning and provision of active travel related initiatives (N = 40), to understand international experiences, as influenced by the surge of interest in active travel during the pandemic. We base our investigations and analysis on two policy process theories – the Multiple Streams Framework and Punctuated Equilibrium Theory. Drawing tools and concepts from both, we provide a synthesis of international experiences with planning for active travel, and analyse how professionals perceive existing obstacles and opportunities for active travel provision once the immediate impacts of the pandemic have waned. Our findings reveal a pervasive adherence to the status quo – while certain policies temporarily adapted to accommodate the pandemic’s disruptions, the pandemic failed to trigger substantial actions for our sample. The primary challenge lies in the enduring dominance of car-centric cultures and urban form, suggesting both a lack of community understanding about the issues associated with car usage, and ongoing structural barriers of cities planned around cars. Notwithstanding, the emergence of active travel projects and strategies since the onset of the pandemic, coupled with increasing public awareness of active travel, could be valuable in laying the groundwork for future long-term changes, even if their immediate impact is not yet evident.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic generated significant impacts on transport policy. Exploring barriers and enablers to active travel through the lens of the practitioners planning for and promoting its uptake can uncover underlying mechanisms that shape travel choices and encourage more effective interventions. This study uses online survey data from practitioners working in the planning and provision of active travel related initiatives (N = 40), to understand international experiences, as influenced by the surge of interest in active travel during the pandemic. We base our investigations and analysis on two policy process theories – the Multiple Streams Framework and Punctuated Equilibrium Theory. Drawing tools and concepts from both, we provide a synthesis of international experiences with planning for active travel, and analyse how professionals perceive existing obstacles and opportunities for active travel provision once the immediate impacts of the pandemic have waned. Our findings reveal a pervasive adherence to the status quo – while certain policies temporarily adapted to accommodate the pandemic’s disruptions, the pandemic failed to trigger substantial actions for our sample. The primary challenge lies in the enduring dominance of car-centric cultures and urban form, suggesting both a lack of community understanding about the issues associated with car usage, and ongoing structural barriers of cities planned around cars. Notwithstanding, the emergence of active travel projects and strategies since the onset of the pandemic, coupled with increasing public awareness of active travel, could be valuable in laying the groundwork for future long-term changes, even if their immediate impact is not yet evident.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
积极旅游规划的国际经验:COVID-19 大流行的影响
COVID-19 大流行对交通政策产生了重大影响。通过规划和促进积极出行的从业人员的视角来探索积极出行的障碍和促进因素,可以发现影响出行选择的潜在机制,并鼓励采取更有效的干预措施。本研究使用了在线调查数据,调查对象是从事积极出行相关计划的规划和提供工作的从业人员(N = 40),目的是了解大流行病期间积极出行兴趣激增对国际经验的影响。我们的调查和分析基于两个政策过程理论--多流框架和动力平衡理论。我们借鉴了这两种理论的工具和概念,对国际上积极出行规划的经验进行了总结,并分析了在大流行病的直接影响减弱后,专业人士如何看待积极出行的现有障碍和机遇。我们的研究结果表明,人们普遍固守现状--虽然某些政策暂时适应了大流行病的干扰,但对我们的样本而言,大流行病并没有引发实质性的行动。主要的挑战在于,以汽车为中心的文化和城市形态仍占主导地位,这表明社区对与汽车使用相关的问题缺乏了解,而且围绕汽车规划的城市仍存在结构性障碍。尽管如此,自疫情爆发以来,积极出行项目和战略的出现,以及公众对积极出行意识的提高,都为未来的长期变革奠定了基础,即使其直接影响尚不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Electric mobility investment in the power and transport sector coupling context: Lessons from Argentina, the Philippines, Poland and Romania Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand Disparities in ridehailing travel times for accessing non-work destinations Optimal bus reassignment considering in-vehicle overcrowding Drones for automated parcel delivery: Use case identification and derivation of technical requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1