Nutritional assessment in patients with chronic liver disease – Current accessibility and implementation

Daphne Bot , Maarten E. Tushuizen , Bart van Hoek
{"title":"Nutritional assessment in patients with chronic liver disease – Current accessibility and implementation","authors":"Daphne Bot ,&nbsp;Maarten E. Tushuizen ,&nbsp;Bart van Hoek","doi":"10.1016/j.nutos.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Poor body composition is associated with impaired outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), and various assessment tools are used. The aim of this study is to gain insight into the clinical practice of nutritional assessment in patients with CLD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A semi-structured online survey on nutritional assessment tools for measuring body composition in patients with CLD was conducted among hepatologists and dietitians, mainly from hospitals between April 2023 and May 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 45 eligible surveys were included in this study (dieticians N=35, hepatologists N=10). All dieticians had at least one nutritional assessment tool available. Bio-electrical impedance and hand-grip strength were the most available and used. The most important reasons for assessment were diagnosis of nutritional status, evaluation of nutritional intervention and for assessing risk of mortality. A proportion of 49% of the dieticians and 60% of the hepatologists respectively were familiar with the ‘European society of parenteral and enteral nutrition Guideline Clinical Nutrition in Liver disease’. Only 13% of dieticians and 60% of the hepatologists knew the ‘European Association for the Study of the Liver Clinical Practice Guidelines on nutrition in chronic liver disease’ and only eight dieticians and one hepatologist used a protocol for nutritional assessment in patients with CLD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The importance of measuring body composition in patients with CLD for diagnosing and monitoring nutritional status and for assessing risk of mortality is well-known by dieticians and most hepatologists. However, implementation of the current guidelines is substandard and should be improved.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36134,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 206-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524001037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Poor body composition is associated with impaired outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), and various assessment tools are used. The aim of this study is to gain insight into the clinical practice of nutritional assessment in patients with CLD.

Methods

A semi-structured online survey on nutritional assessment tools for measuring body composition in patients with CLD was conducted among hepatologists and dietitians, mainly from hospitals between April 2023 and May 2023.

Results

A total of 45 eligible surveys were included in this study (dieticians N=35, hepatologists N=10). All dieticians had at least one nutritional assessment tool available. Bio-electrical impedance and hand-grip strength were the most available and used. The most important reasons for assessment were diagnosis of nutritional status, evaluation of nutritional intervention and for assessing risk of mortality. A proportion of 49% of the dieticians and 60% of the hepatologists respectively were familiar with the ‘European society of parenteral and enteral nutrition Guideline Clinical Nutrition in Liver disease’. Only 13% of dieticians and 60% of the hepatologists knew the ‘European Association for the Study of the Liver Clinical Practice Guidelines on nutrition in chronic liver disease’ and only eight dieticians and one hepatologist used a protocol for nutritional assessment in patients with CLD.

Conclusion

The importance of measuring body composition in patients with CLD for diagnosing and monitoring nutritional status and for assessing risk of mortality is well-known by dieticians and most hepatologists. However, implementation of the current guidelines is substandard and should be improved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性肝病患者的营养评估 - 当前的可及性和实施情况
背景和目的身体成分不良与慢性肝病(CLD)患者的预后受损有关,目前使用的评估工具多种多样。本研究旨在深入了解慢性肝病患者营养评估的临床实践情况。方法在 2023 年 4 月至 2023 年 5 月期间,对主要来自医院的肝病专家和营养师进行了关于测量慢性肝病患者身体成分的营养评估工具的半结构化在线调查。结果本研究共纳入 45 份符合条件的调查(营养师 N=35,肝病专家 N=10)。所有营养师都至少拥有一种营养评估工具。生物电阻抗和手握力是可用和使用最多的工具。进行评估的最重要原因是诊断营养状况、评估营养干预措施和评估死亡风险。分别有 49% 的营养师和 60% 的肝病专家熟悉 "欧洲肠外和肠内营养学会肝病临床营养指南"。只有 13% 的营养师和 60% 的肝病专家了解《欧洲肝病研究协会慢性肝病营养临床实践指南》,而且只有 8 名营养师和 1 名肝病专家使用了慢性肝病患者营养评估规程。然而,现行指南的执行情况并不达标,应加以改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Clinical Nutrition Open Science Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beneficial effects of probiotics to flatten the curve of COVID-19 pandemic: A review Religious intermittent fasting: Effects on liver health, metabolic markers, and gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes patients Experiences among patients with short bowel syndrome and their caregivers: Insights from targeted forums The effect of resveratrol on the viability of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells Toxicological and histopathological effects of sodium benzoate used in commercially available fruit juice on liver and kidney tissue in mice model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1