Deep learning outperforms classical machine learning methods in pediatric brain tumor classification through mass spectra

Thais Maria Santos Bezerra , Matheus Silva de Deus , Felipe Cavalaro , Denise Ribeiro , Ana Luiza Seidinger , Izilda Aparecida Cardinalli , Andreia de Melo Porcari , Luciano de Souza Queiroz , Helio Pedrini , Joao Meidanis
{"title":"Deep learning outperforms classical machine learning methods in pediatric brain tumor classification through mass spectra","authors":"Thais Maria Santos Bezerra ,&nbsp;Matheus Silva de Deus ,&nbsp;Felipe Cavalaro ,&nbsp;Denise Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Ana Luiza Seidinger ,&nbsp;Izilda Aparecida Cardinalli ,&nbsp;Andreia de Melo Porcari ,&nbsp;Luciano de Souza Queiroz ,&nbsp;Helio Pedrini ,&nbsp;Joao Meidanis","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmed.2024.100178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pediatric brain tumors are the most common cause of death among all childhood cancers and surgical resection usually is the first step in disease management. During surgery, it is important to perform safe gross resection of tumors, retaining as much brain tissue as possible. Therefore, appropriate resection margin delineation is extremely relevant.</div><div>Currently available methods for tissue analysis have limited precision, are time-consuming, and often require multiple invasive procedures. Our main goal is to test whether machine learning techniques are capable of classifying the pediatric brain tissue chemical profile generated by DESI-MSI, which is mainly lipidic, into normal or abnormal tissue and into low- and high-grade malignancy subareas within each sample.</div><div>Our experiments show that deep learning methods outperform classical machine learning methods in the task of classifying brain tissue from DESI-MSI mass spectra, both in normal versus abnormal tissue, and, for malignant tissues, in low-grade versus high-grade malignancy.</div><div>Our conclusion are based on the analysis of 34,870 annotated spectra, obtained from the neoplastic and non-neoplastic microanatomical stratification of individual samples from 116 pediatric patients who underwent brain tumor surgical resection at the Boldrini Children’s Center between 2000 and 2020. Support Vector Machines, Random, Forests, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) were among the classical machine learning techniques evaluated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73399,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence-based medicine","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521224000450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pediatric brain tumors are the most common cause of death among all childhood cancers and surgical resection usually is the first step in disease management. During surgery, it is important to perform safe gross resection of tumors, retaining as much brain tissue as possible. Therefore, appropriate resection margin delineation is extremely relevant.
Currently available methods for tissue analysis have limited precision, are time-consuming, and often require multiple invasive procedures. Our main goal is to test whether machine learning techniques are capable of classifying the pediatric brain tissue chemical profile generated by DESI-MSI, which is mainly lipidic, into normal or abnormal tissue and into low- and high-grade malignancy subareas within each sample.
Our experiments show that deep learning methods outperform classical machine learning methods in the task of classifying brain tissue from DESI-MSI mass spectra, both in normal versus abnormal tissue, and, for malignant tissues, in low-grade versus high-grade malignancy.
Our conclusion are based on the analysis of 34,870 annotated spectra, obtained from the neoplastic and non-neoplastic microanatomical stratification of individual samples from 116 pediatric patients who underwent brain tumor surgical resection at the Boldrini Children’s Center between 2000 and 2020. Support Vector Machines, Random, Forests, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) were among the classical machine learning techniques evaluated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在通过质谱进行儿科脑肿瘤分类方面,深度学习优于经典机器学习方法
小儿脑肿瘤是所有儿童癌症中最常见的死亡原因,手术切除通常是疾病治疗的第一步。在手术过程中,必须对肿瘤进行安全的大体切除,尽可能多地保留脑组织。目前可用的组织分析方法精度有限、耗时长,而且往往需要多个侵入性程序。我们的主要目标是测试机器学习技术是否能够将 DESI-MSI 生成的主要为脂质的小儿脑组织化学图谱分为正常或异常组织,以及每个样本中的低度和高度恶性肿瘤亚区。我们的实验表明,在根据 DESI-MSI 质谱对脑组织进行分类的任务中,深度学习方法优于经典的机器学习方法,无论是正常组织还是异常组织,以及恶性组织中的低度恶性肿瘤还是高度恶性肿瘤。我们的结论是基于对 34,870 个注释光谱的分析得出的,这些光谱来自对 116 名儿科患者的肿瘤性和非肿瘤性微解剖分层,这些患者于 2000 年至 2020 年期间在博尔德里尼儿童中心接受了脑肿瘤手术切除。支持向量机、随机森林和最小绝对缩减与选择操作器(LASSO)是经过评估的经典机器学习技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence-based medicine
Intelligence-based medicine Health Informatics
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
187 days
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence in child development monitoring: A systematic review on usage, outcomes and acceptance Automatic characterization of cerebral MRI images for the detection of autism spectrum disorders DOTnet 2.0: Deep learning network for diffuse optical tomography image reconstruction Artificial intelligence in child development monitoring: A systematic review on usage, outcomes and acceptance Clustering polycystic ovary syndrome laboratory results extracted from a large internet forum with machine learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1