Impact of differentiated carbon taxes on remanufacturing mode selection

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107955
Xiqiang Xia, Jun Chen, Wei Wang, Haijie Wang
{"title":"Impact of differentiated carbon taxes on remanufacturing mode selection","authors":"Xiqiang Xia,&nbsp;Jun Chen,&nbsp;Wei Wang,&nbsp;Haijie Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In current remanufacturing supply chains, whether the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) independently engages in remanufacturing or delegating (authorizing or outsourcing) to a third-party remanufacturer (TPR) is influenced by the government's differentiated carbon tax. However, our understanding of the factors influencing the optimal choice among the three remanufacturing strategies (i.e., self-remanufacturing, authorizing remanufacturing, and outsourcing remanufacturing) is fairly limited. In particular, little attention has been paid to differentiated carbon taxes, which involve the government imposing a high carbon tax on new products and a low carbon tax on remanufactured products. To fill these gaps, this study develops game models that include an OEM and a TPR. Our analysis reveals four main findings. First, with the increase in carbon tax on new products, the price of both new and remanufactured products rises. By contrast, once the carbon tax on remanufactured products increases, only the price of remanufactured products rises. Second, when the carbon tax gap between new and remanufactured products is small and the ratio of environmental impact per unit of remanufactured products to that of new products is less than consumer preference, both outsourcing remanufacturing and self-remanufacturing could achieve a win-win situation in reducing environmental impact and enhancing consumer surplus. Third, regardless of the governments' setting of the differentiated carbon tax, the OEM, as a profit-seeker, will decline the authorizing remanufacturing to expand profits in any case. Further, when the carbon tax gap between new and remanufactured products is less than a certain threshold, the optimal mode for the OEM is outsourcing remanufacturing, followed by self-remanufacturing. Fourth, our numerical analysis indicates that the carbon tax gap between new and remanufactured products plays a vital role in optimal remanufacturing strategy selection. Notably, both the recycling scale of wasted products and consumer preferences for remanufactured products should be taken into account when making an optimal remanufacturing selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 107955"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324006637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In current remanufacturing supply chains, whether the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) independently engages in remanufacturing or delegating (authorizing or outsourcing) to a third-party remanufacturer (TPR) is influenced by the government's differentiated carbon tax. However, our understanding of the factors influencing the optimal choice among the three remanufacturing strategies (i.e., self-remanufacturing, authorizing remanufacturing, and outsourcing remanufacturing) is fairly limited. In particular, little attention has been paid to differentiated carbon taxes, which involve the government imposing a high carbon tax on new products and a low carbon tax on remanufactured products. To fill these gaps, this study develops game models that include an OEM and a TPR. Our analysis reveals four main findings. First, with the increase in carbon tax on new products, the price of both new and remanufactured products rises. By contrast, once the carbon tax on remanufactured products increases, only the price of remanufactured products rises. Second, when the carbon tax gap between new and remanufactured products is small and the ratio of environmental impact per unit of remanufactured products to that of new products is less than consumer preference, both outsourcing remanufacturing and self-remanufacturing could achieve a win-win situation in reducing environmental impact and enhancing consumer surplus. Third, regardless of the governments' setting of the differentiated carbon tax, the OEM, as a profit-seeker, will decline the authorizing remanufacturing to expand profits in any case. Further, when the carbon tax gap between new and remanufactured products is less than a certain threshold, the optimal mode for the OEM is outsourcing remanufacturing, followed by self-remanufacturing. Fourth, our numerical analysis indicates that the carbon tax gap between new and remanufactured products plays a vital role in optimal remanufacturing strategy selection. Notably, both the recycling scale of wasted products and consumer preferences for remanufactured products should be taken into account when making an optimal remanufacturing selection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
差异化碳税对再制造模式选择的影响
在当前的再制造供应链中,原始设备制造商(OEM)是独立从事再制造,还是委托(授权或外包)给第三方再制造商(TPR),受到政府差别化碳税的影响。然而,我们对三种再制造策略(即自我再制造、授权再制造和外包再制造)之间最优选择的影响因素的了解还相当有限。特别是,人们很少关注差别碳税,即政府对新产品征收高碳税,对再制造产品征收低碳税。为了填补这些空白,本研究建立了包含原始设备制造商和再制造产品制造商的博弈模型。我们的分析揭示了四个主要结论。首先,随着新产品碳税的增加,新产品和再制造产品的价格都会上涨。相比之下,一旦再制造产品的碳税增加,只有再制造产品的价格上涨。其次,当新产品和再制造产品的碳税差距较小,且再制造产品单位环境影响与新产品单位环境影响之比小于消费者偏好时,外包再制造和自主再制造都能实现降低环境影响和提高消费者剩余的双赢。第三,无论政府如何设置差别碳税,作为逐利者的整车厂无论如何都会拒绝授权再制造以扩大利润。此外,当新产品和再制造产品之间的碳税差距小于一定临界值时,整车厂的最优模式是外包再制造,其次是自我再制造。第四,我们的数值分析表明,新产品和再制造产品之间的碳税差距在最优再制造战略选择中起着至关重要的作用。值得注意的是,在做出最佳再制造选择时,应同时考虑废弃产品的回收规模和消费者对再制造产品的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Zooming in or zooming out: Energy strategy, developmental parity and regional entrepreneurial dynamism How financial derivatives affect energy firms' ESG The performance of renewable-rich wholesale electricity markets with significant energy storage and flexibility Retraction notice to “Geopolitical oil price uncertainty transmission into core inflation: Evidence from two of the biggest global players” Energy Economics Volume 126, October 2023, 106,983. Novel and old news sentiment in commodity futures markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1