Geochronological assessment of the Arabian-Nubian Shield plutonic intrusions in the arc assemblages along the Qift-Quseir transect, Central Eastern Desert of Egypt
Sherif Mansour , Noriko Hasebe , Akihiro Tamura , Kamal Abdelrahman , Mohammed S. Fnais , Mohamed A. Gharib , Mohamed Zaki Khedr
{"title":"Geochronological assessment of the Arabian-Nubian Shield plutonic intrusions in the arc assemblages along the Qift-Quseir transect, Central Eastern Desert of Egypt","authors":"Sherif Mansour , Noriko Hasebe , Akihiro Tamura , Kamal Abdelrahman , Mohammed S. Fnais , Mohamed A. Gharib , Mohamed Zaki Khedr","doi":"10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2024.105456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ophiolitic mélange and granitic intrusions along the Qift<strong>‒</strong>Quseir transect in the Central Eastern Desert (CED) of Egypt are parts of the Egyptian Nubian Shield (ENS), which is the northern segment of the East African Orogeny (EAO). The Arabian-Nubian Shield (ANS) is the longest Neoproterozoic belt on Earth, and it was formed during the East and West Gondwanaland collisions within the framework of the EAO. The ANS basement rocks were developed during three distinct phases of magmatic activity: the island arc and syn-collisional phases, identifying a compressional tectonic regime, and a post-collisional phase that identifies changing the tectonic regime into an extensional type. The geochronological assessment of these magmatic activities is essential for understanding the regional geology and tectonic development of the ANS. In our study, we dated different rock units along the Qift<strong>‒</strong>Quseir transect and revealed ages ranging from the Late Tonian (820 ± 8 Ma) to the Late Ediacaran (563 ± 4 Ma). These ages were associated with three different magmatic pulses: (1) a seafloor spreading and island arc phase (ophiolite and related rocks), represented by sample QQ05, which was dated from 820 ± 8 Ma; (2) a syn-collisional phase, represented by samples QQ08 and QQ10, dated from 733 ± 10 Ma and 729 ± 10 Ma, respectively; and (3) a post-collisional phase, represented by all the other samples, dated from the Ediacaran at 603 ± 9 Ma to 563 ± 5 Ma. These results showed that the post-collisional phase was dominant, especially in terms of the alkali-feldspar granites, relative to ophiolitic rocks, and the syn-collisional granites in the CED. Initiation of the Dokhan Volcanic eruptions at 639 ± 2 Ma gave us the date of the compressional-to-extensional tectonic transition setting, and the post-collisional tensional regime was activated at 603 ± 9 Ma. Additionally, we identified evidence of local magmatic sources by dating 11 grains of Paleo-to Meso-Proterozoic xenocrysts with ages ranging from 1876 ± 18 to 1070 ± 13 Ma (i.e., components of the pre-Arabian-Nubian Shield).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14874,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Earth Sciences","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 105456"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464343X24002905","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The ophiolitic mélange and granitic intrusions along the Qift‒Quseir transect in the Central Eastern Desert (CED) of Egypt are parts of the Egyptian Nubian Shield (ENS), which is the northern segment of the East African Orogeny (EAO). The Arabian-Nubian Shield (ANS) is the longest Neoproterozoic belt on Earth, and it was formed during the East and West Gondwanaland collisions within the framework of the EAO. The ANS basement rocks were developed during three distinct phases of magmatic activity: the island arc and syn-collisional phases, identifying a compressional tectonic regime, and a post-collisional phase that identifies changing the tectonic regime into an extensional type. The geochronological assessment of these magmatic activities is essential for understanding the regional geology and tectonic development of the ANS. In our study, we dated different rock units along the Qift‒Quseir transect and revealed ages ranging from the Late Tonian (820 ± 8 Ma) to the Late Ediacaran (563 ± 4 Ma). These ages were associated with three different magmatic pulses: (1) a seafloor spreading and island arc phase (ophiolite and related rocks), represented by sample QQ05, which was dated from 820 ± 8 Ma; (2) a syn-collisional phase, represented by samples QQ08 and QQ10, dated from 733 ± 10 Ma and 729 ± 10 Ma, respectively; and (3) a post-collisional phase, represented by all the other samples, dated from the Ediacaran at 603 ± 9 Ma to 563 ± 5 Ma. These results showed that the post-collisional phase was dominant, especially in terms of the alkali-feldspar granites, relative to ophiolitic rocks, and the syn-collisional granites in the CED. Initiation of the Dokhan Volcanic eruptions at 639 ± 2 Ma gave us the date of the compressional-to-extensional tectonic transition setting, and the post-collisional tensional regime was activated at 603 ± 9 Ma. Additionally, we identified evidence of local magmatic sources by dating 11 grains of Paleo-to Meso-Proterozoic xenocrysts with ages ranging from 1876 ± 18 to 1070 ± 13 Ma (i.e., components of the pre-Arabian-Nubian Shield).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of African Earth Sciences sees itself as the prime geological journal for all aspects of the Earth Sciences about the African plate. Papers dealing with peripheral areas are welcome if they demonstrate a tight link with Africa.
The Journal publishes high quality, peer-reviewed scientific papers. It is devoted primarily to research papers but short communications relating to new developments of broad interest, reviews and book reviews will also be considered. Papers must have international appeal and should present work of more regional than local significance and dealing with well identified and justified scientific questions. Specialised technical papers, analytical or exploration reports must be avoided. Papers on applied geology should preferably be linked to such core disciplines and must be addressed to a more general geoscientific audience.