Conceptualizing precarious employment through the lens of social reproduction: Potential implications for health research and action

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SSM. Qualitative research in health Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100494
Emilia F. Vignola , Emily Q. Ahonen , Luis Saavedra , Emma K. Tsui
{"title":"Conceptualizing precarious employment through the lens of social reproduction: Potential implications for health research and action","authors":"Emilia F. Vignola ,&nbsp;Emily Q. Ahonen ,&nbsp;Luis Saavedra ,&nbsp;Emma K. Tsui","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on the health and well-being impact of precarious employment (PE) commonly conceptualizes employment as a relation of power between workers and employers, a perspective informed by power relations and relational social class theories. Social reproduction theory is a less common but complementary conceptual lens that can be used to investigate PE and health, in which the <em>nature of work</em> has relevance for the <em>quality of employment</em>. Social reproduction theory points to relations between groups of workers who are valued differently based on the capacity of their work to generate profit. Attending to relations between workers based on value, in addition to the well-established power relation between workers and employers, may point to consequences for health and well-being that are worth exploring empirically, and could serve as another tool to spur collective action around PE and its health effects. We provide an illustration and discuss the potential implications of this theoretical approach using data from in-depth interviews conducted in 2022 among precariously employed food workers in New York City.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524001033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on the health and well-being impact of precarious employment (PE) commonly conceptualizes employment as a relation of power between workers and employers, a perspective informed by power relations and relational social class theories. Social reproduction theory is a less common but complementary conceptual lens that can be used to investigate PE and health, in which the nature of work has relevance for the quality of employment. Social reproduction theory points to relations between groups of workers who are valued differently based on the capacity of their work to generate profit. Attending to relations between workers based on value, in addition to the well-established power relation between workers and employers, may point to consequences for health and well-being that are worth exploring empirically, and could serve as another tool to spur collective action around PE and its health effects. We provide an illustration and discuss the potential implications of this theoretical approach using data from in-depth interviews conducted in 2022 among precariously employed food workers in New York City.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从社会再生产的角度理解不稳定就业的概念:对健康研究和行动的潜在影响
关于不稳定就业(PE)对健康和福祉影响的研究通常将就业概念化为工人与雇主之间的权力关系,这种观点参考了权力关系和社会阶层关系理论。社会再生产理论是一个不太常见但却可以用来研究不稳定就业与健康的补充概念视角,其中工作性质与就业质量息息相关。社会再生产理论指出了工人群体之间的关系,他们因其工作产生利润的能力而受到不同的重视。除了工人与雇主之间既定的权力关系外,关注工人之间基于价值的关系可能会对健康和福祉产生影响,值得进行实证探索,并可作为另一种工具,激励围绕 PE 及其对健康的影响采取集体行动。我们利用 2022 年对纽约市就业不稳定的食品工人进行的深入访谈数据,对这一理论方法的潜在影响进行了说明和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study of sources of knowledge in individuals with hoarding disorder: The impact of media depictions and social comparisons Perspectives of Palestinian physicians on the impact of the Gaza War in the West Bank “I am forced to just give it to her because she is the one who wants it”: A qualitative study of providers’ perspectives on contraceptive counseling in Tanzania Prenatal care in urban China: Qualitative study on challenges and coping mechanisms Ableism in mental healthcare settings: A qualitative study among U.S. adults with disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1