A comparison of core muscle endurance of females with fibromyalgia versus healthy females: An observational study

Dewanshu Sindwani, Manjyot Kaur
{"title":"A comparison of core muscle endurance of females with fibromyalgia versus healthy females: An observational study","authors":"Dewanshu Sindwani,&nbsp;Manjyot Kaur","doi":"10.1016/j.rcreue.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Despite the numerous benefits of core muscle strengthening in improving symptoms of fibromyalgia (FM), limited studies have quantified core muscle function in FM patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the core muscle endurance of FM females with age-matched healthy females and determine whether a correlation exists between core muscle endurance and FM severity.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Pre-diagnosed female FM patients (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->7) and age-matched healthy females (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->19) were assessed using McGill's core endurance tests in four positions – flexion, extension, and bilateral side-bridge. The longest contraction holding time (in seconds) in each position was noted and compared in both groups. Additionally, patient-reported Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) scores were obtained to determine disease severity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean holding time for trunk extensors (26.14<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.7<!--> <!-->s), right lateral flexors (20.14<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8.3<!--> <!-->s), and left lateral flexors (20.86<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.3<!--> <!-->s) was significantly lower in the FM females than the healthy females (trunk extensors<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->55.21<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->17.1<!--> <!-->s; right lateral flexors<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->36.05<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->13.2<!--> <!-->s; left lateral flexors<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->35.11<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->13.8<!--> <!-->s). The endurance of trunk flexors was statistically similar in both groups (FM females<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->52.14<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->27.9<!--> <!-->s; healthy females<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->74.37<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->37.7<!--> <!-->s). Lastly, core muscle endurance was not correlated with the FIQ scores in FM patients (<em>p</em> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of this preliminary study revealed that core extensor and lateral flexor endurance in FM females was lower than their healthy female counterparts. Larger sample studies are needed to further substantiate our findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101099,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)","volume":"31 4","pages":"Pages 473-479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444440524001249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Despite the numerous benefits of core muscle strengthening in improving symptoms of fibromyalgia (FM), limited studies have quantified core muscle function in FM patients.

Objective

To compare the core muscle endurance of FM females with age-matched healthy females and determine whether a correlation exists between core muscle endurance and FM severity.

Materials and methods

Pre-diagnosed female FM patients (n = 7) and age-matched healthy females (n = 19) were assessed using McGill's core endurance tests in four positions – flexion, extension, and bilateral side-bridge. The longest contraction holding time (in seconds) in each position was noted and compared in both groups. Additionally, patient-reported Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) scores were obtained to determine disease severity.

Results

The mean holding time for trunk extensors (26.14 ± 7.7 s), right lateral flexors (20.14 ± 8.3 s), and left lateral flexors (20.86 ± 5.3 s) was significantly lower in the FM females than the healthy females (trunk extensors = 55.21 ± 17.1 s; right lateral flexors = 36.05 ± 13.2 s; left lateral flexors = 35.11 ± 13.8 s). The endurance of trunk flexors was statistically similar in both groups (FM females = 52.14 ± 27.9 s; healthy females = 74.37 ± 37.7 s). Lastly, core muscle endurance was not correlated with the FIQ scores in FM patients (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The results of this preliminary study revealed that core extensor and lateral flexor endurance in FM females was lower than their healthy female counterparts. Larger sample studies are needed to further substantiate our findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纤维肌痛女性患者与健康女性核心肌耐力的比较:观察研究
引言尽管增强核心肌肉对改善纤维肌痛(FM)症状有诸多益处,但对 FM 患者核心肌肉功能进行量化的研究却很有限。目的比较 FM 女性与年龄匹配的健康女性的核心肌肉耐力,并确定核心肌肉耐力与 FM 严重程度之间是否存在相关性。材料和方法使用麦吉尔核心耐力测试,在屈曲、伸展和双侧桥式四种姿势下,对确诊的女性 FM 患者(n = 7)和年龄匹配的健康女性(n = 19)进行评估。记录每个体位的最长收缩保持时间(秒),并对两组进行比较。结果 躯干伸肌(26.14 ± 7.7 秒)、右侧屈肌(20.14 ± 8.3 秒)和左侧屈肌(20.86 ± 5.3 秒)的平均保持时间,FM 女性明显低于健康女性(躯干伸肌 = 55.21 ± 17.1 秒;右侧屈肌 = 36.05 ± 13.2 秒;左侧屈肌 = 35.11 ± 13.8 秒)。两组的躯干屈肌耐力在统计上相似(FM 女性 = 52.14 ± 27.9 秒;健康女性 = 74.37 ± 37.7 秒)。最后,核心肌耐力与 FM 患者的 FIQ 分数不相关(p > 0.05)。要进一步证实我们的研究结果,还需要进行更大规模的样本研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validation of FACIT-fatigue in Spanish-speaking patients with rheumatoid arthritis A comparison of core muscle endurance of females with fibromyalgia versus healthy females: An observational study Central tolerance in T cells, what’s new? Evaluation of clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from the patient's perspective: a narrative review of the literature Balancing inflammation and adverse effects of glucocorticoids in clinical practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1