Active portfolio management in the face of ESG uncertainty: An agile framework for adaptive investment strategies

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE North American Journal of Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1016/j.najef.2024.102295
Limin Wen , Junxue Li , Jiliang Sheng , Yi Zhang
{"title":"Active portfolio management in the face of ESG uncertainty: An agile framework for adaptive investment strategies","authors":"Limin Wen ,&nbsp;Junxue Li ,&nbsp;Jiliang Sheng ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.najef.2024.102295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper establishes an active portfolio model that considers corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings, examining the impact of ESG information on portfolio performance. Based on the exponential utility function, the paper incorporates ESG scores and ESG risk (uncertainty factors) into active portfolio management and derives the analytical solution of the model. Theoretical findings indicate that ESG risk adjusts the optimal portfolio, helping to mitigate losses due to ESG divergence. The paper conducts empirical research using ESG ratings from three well-known rating agencies and the CSI300 index. The empirical results demonstrate that ESG preferences enhance the ESG quality of the portfolio. Consistent with theoretical predictions, reliance on a single ESG rating may lead to adverse outcomes, especially when the selected rating agency’s standards deviate from market norms. In contrast, portfolios that include ESG uncertainty exhibit higher stability and lower loss risk, showing good robustness across different stages and industries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47831,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102295"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940824002201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper establishes an active portfolio model that considers corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings, examining the impact of ESG information on portfolio performance. Based on the exponential utility function, the paper incorporates ESG scores and ESG risk (uncertainty factors) into active portfolio management and derives the analytical solution of the model. Theoretical findings indicate that ESG risk adjusts the optimal portfolio, helping to mitigate losses due to ESG divergence. The paper conducts empirical research using ESG ratings from three well-known rating agencies and the CSI300 index. The empirical results demonstrate that ESG preferences enhance the ESG quality of the portfolio. Consistent with theoretical predictions, reliance on a single ESG rating may lead to adverse outcomes, especially when the selected rating agency’s standards deviate from market norms. In contrast, portfolios that include ESG uncertainty exhibit higher stability and lower loss risk, showing good robustness across different stages and industries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对环境、社会和治理不确定性的积极投资组合管理:适应性投资战略的敏捷框架
本文建立了一个考虑企业环境、社会和治理(ESG)评级的主动投资组合模型,研究了ESG信息对投资组合绩效的影响。基于指数效用函数,本文将 ESG 分数和 ESG 风险(不确定性因素)纳入主动投资组合管理,并推导出该模型的分析解决方案。理论研究结果表明,ESG 风险会调整最优投资组合,有助于减少 ESG 分歧造成的损失。本文利用三家知名评级机构的 ESG 评级和沪深 300 指数进行了实证研究。实证结果表明,ESG 偏好会提高投资组合的 ESG 质量。与理论预测一致,依赖单一的 ESG 评级可能会导致不利的结果,尤其是当所选择的评级机构的标准偏离市场规范时。与此相反,包含 ESG 不确定性的投资组合表现出更高的稳定性和更低的损失风险,在不同阶段和不同行业都表现出良好的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
168
期刊介绍: The focus of the North-American Journal of Economics and Finance is on the economics of integration of goods, services, financial markets, at both regional and global levels with the role of economic policy in that process playing an important role. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome. Empirical and policy-related papers that rely on data and the experiences of countries outside North America are also welcome. Papers should offer concrete lessons about the ongoing process of globalization, or policy implications about how governments, domestic or international institutions, can improve the coordination of their activities. Empirical analysis should be capable of replication. Authors of accepted papers will be encouraged to supply data and computer programs.
期刊最新文献
Which opinion is more trustworthy: An analysts’ earnings forecast quality assessment framework based on machine learning Volatility estimation through stochastic processes: Evidence from cryptocurrencies Does economic policy uncertainty matter to corporate default probability? findings from theoretic analyses and China’s listed firms ESG rating and default risk: Evidence from China Spatial linkages of positive feedback trading among the stock index futures markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1