Productivity performance, distance to frontier and AI innovation: Firm-level evidence from Europe

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106762
Larissa da Silva Marioni , Ana Rincon-Aznar , Francesco Venturini
{"title":"Productivity performance, distance to frontier and AI innovation: Firm-level evidence from Europe","authors":"Larissa da Silva Marioni ,&nbsp;Ana Rincon-Aznar ,&nbsp;Francesco Venturini","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using firm-level data from 15 European countries between 2011 and 2019, this paper examines the productivity effect associated with the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), measured by patenting success in AI fields. By making advances in AI and expanding on their knowledge base, companies can optimise production tasks, and improve resource utilisation, ultimately leading to higher levels of efficiency. To investigate this, we develop a two-fold panel regression analysis estimated within a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) framework. First, we investigate whether firms that engage in AI innovation experience a productivity boost after developing the new technology, compared to similar firms which do not undertake AI innovation. To analyse this, we employ a novel event-analysis methodology that quantifies the effect of the treatment (AI innovation) on firm performance (productivity) using a Local Projections approach within the DiD setting. Second, we utilise a Distance-to-Frontier (DTF) regression framework in order to examine whether the productivity premium of AI is associated with a firm’s ability to absorb knowledge and learn from the technologies developed by market leaders. Our findings reveal that the productivity gains directly associated with AI are statistically significant and quantitatively important, ranging between 6.2 and 17% in the event analysis, and between 2.1 and 6% in the DTF framework. We also provide some evidence that the productivity benefits of AI might be greater for those firms further away from the frontier (between 0.3 and 0.7%). Our research demonstrates that Artificial Intelligence can play a crucial role in enhancing firm productivity in Europe, a result that is evident even in these early stages of the technology’s life cycle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 106762"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268124003767","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using firm-level data from 15 European countries between 2011 and 2019, this paper examines the productivity effect associated with the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), measured by patenting success in AI fields. By making advances in AI and expanding on their knowledge base, companies can optimise production tasks, and improve resource utilisation, ultimately leading to higher levels of efficiency. To investigate this, we develop a two-fold panel regression analysis estimated within a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) framework. First, we investigate whether firms that engage in AI innovation experience a productivity boost after developing the new technology, compared to similar firms which do not undertake AI innovation. To analyse this, we employ a novel event-analysis methodology that quantifies the effect of the treatment (AI innovation) on firm performance (productivity) using a Local Projections approach within the DiD setting. Second, we utilise a Distance-to-Frontier (DTF) regression framework in order to examine whether the productivity premium of AI is associated with a firm’s ability to absorb knowledge and learn from the technologies developed by market leaders. Our findings reveal that the productivity gains directly associated with AI are statistically significant and quantitatively important, ranging between 6.2 and 17% in the event analysis, and between 2.1 and 6% in the DTF framework. We also provide some evidence that the productivity benefits of AI might be greater for those firms further away from the frontier (between 0.3 and 0.7%). Our research demonstrates that Artificial Intelligence can play a crucial role in enhancing firm productivity in Europe, a result that is evident even in these early stages of the technology’s life cycle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生产力绩效、前沿距离和人工智能创新:欧洲企业层面的证据
本文利用 2011 年至 2019 年期间 15 个欧洲国家的企业级数据,研究了与人工智能(AI)发展相关的生产力效应,该效应以人工智能领域的专利申请成功率为衡量标准。通过在人工智能领域取得进步并扩大知识基础,企业可以优化生产任务,提高资源利用率,最终实现更高的效率水平。为了研究这一点,我们在差分法(DiD)框架内进行了两方面的面板回归分析。首先,我们研究了与没有进行人工智能创新的类似企业相比,进行人工智能创新的企业在开发新技术后是否会提高生产率。为了分析这一点,我们采用了一种新颖的事件分析方法,利用 DiD 环境下的局部预测法量化处理(人工智能创新)对企业绩效(生产率)的影响。其次,我们利用 "前沿距离"(DTF)回归框架,研究人工智能的生产率溢价是否与企业吸收知识和学习市场领导者开发的技术的能力有关。我们的研究结果表明,与人工智能直接相关的生产率收益在统计上是显著的,在数量上也是重要的,在事件分析中介于 6.2% 到 17% 之间,在 DTF 框架中介于 2.1% 到 6% 之间。我们还提供了一些证据,表明人工智能对那些离前沿更远的企业来说,生产率收益可能更大(在 0.3% 到 0.7% 之间)。我们的研究表明,人工智能可以在提高欧洲企业生产率方面发挥关键作用,即使在该技术生命周期的早期阶段,这一结果也是显而易见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Belief diversity and cooperation State-dependent impulse responses in agent-based models: A new methodology and an economic application How to increase and sustain cooperation in public goods games: Conditional commitments via a mediator Does provincial gambling culture affect corporate innovation? Evidence from China Does family culture hamper corporate deceptive green behavior decision-making?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1