Is institutional pressure the driver for green business model innovation of SMEs? Mediating and moderating roles of regional innovation intermediaries

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123814
Min-Jae Lee , Hyeseung Choi , Taewoo Roh
{"title":"Is institutional pressure the driver for green business model innovation of SMEs? Mediating and moderating roles of regional innovation intermediaries","authors":"Min-Jae Lee ,&nbsp;Hyeseung Choi ,&nbsp;Taewoo Roh","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While extant research has concentrated on the promotion of regional innovation, it has predominantly adopted a knowledge-based approach. However, there has been a paucity of inquiry into the collective influence of institutional pressure and regional innovation intermediaries (RIIs) on the green business model innovation (GBMI) of small-and-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This study aims to identify the mechanisms through which SMEs enhance their GBMI, arguing that RIIs' multifaceted response to institutional pressures can act as both a mediator and a moderator. The empirical results, based on data collected from 176 South Korean SMEs in collaboration with Technoparks, indicate that institutional pressures, specifically regulatory and normative pressures, positively impact GBMI. Although RIIs demonstrate a positive mediating effect on the relationship between institutional pressures and GBMI, the moderating effect of RII yielded a mixed result: positive moderation with regulatory pressure and negative with normative pressure. The findings of our study suggest that RIIs should cultivate a nuanced understanding of the distinctive attributes of each institutional pressure to bolster the GBMI of SMEs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 123814"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524006127","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While extant research has concentrated on the promotion of regional innovation, it has predominantly adopted a knowledge-based approach. However, there has been a paucity of inquiry into the collective influence of institutional pressure and regional innovation intermediaries (RIIs) on the green business model innovation (GBMI) of small-and-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This study aims to identify the mechanisms through which SMEs enhance their GBMI, arguing that RIIs' multifaceted response to institutional pressures can act as both a mediator and a moderator. The empirical results, based on data collected from 176 South Korean SMEs in collaboration with Technoparks, indicate that institutional pressures, specifically regulatory and normative pressures, positively impact GBMI. Although RIIs demonstrate a positive mediating effect on the relationship between institutional pressures and GBMI, the moderating effect of RII yielded a mixed result: positive moderation with regulatory pressure and negative with normative pressure. The findings of our study suggest that RIIs should cultivate a nuanced understanding of the distinctive attributes of each institutional pressure to bolster the GBMI of SMEs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度压力是中小企业绿色商业模式创新的驱动力吗?区域创新中介机构的中介和调节作用
虽然现有研究集中于促进区域创新,但主要采用的是以知识为基础的方法。然而,关于制度压力和区域创新中介机构(RIIs)对中小型企业(SMEs)绿色商业模式创新(GBMI)的集体影响的研究却很少。本研究旨在确定中小型企业加强其绿色商业模式创新的机制,认为区域创新中介机构对制度压力的多方面反应既可以起到中介作用,也可以起到调节作用。基于与科技园合作收集的 176 家韩国中小企业的数据,实证结果表明,制度压力,特别是监管和规范压力,对 GBMI 有积极影响。虽然 RII 对制度压力和 GBMI 之间的关系有积极的中介作用,但 RII 的调节作用却产生了好坏参半的结果:与监管压力的调节作用为正,与规范压力的调节作用为负。我们的研究结果表明,风险投资机构应深入了解每种制度压力的独特属性,以促进中小企业的GBMI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
Roles of related and unrelated external technologies in shaping regional breakthrough technological advantages Standardization and Standards: Safeguards of Technological Sovereignty? Understanding service robot adoption and resistance from a service provider perspective Examining trust in cryptocurrency investment: Insights from the structural equation modeling Enabling a viable circular ecosystem for electric vehicle batteries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1