A bibliometric exploration of environmental sustainability in supply chain research

Brintha Rajendran , Manivannan Babu , Naliniprava Tripathy , Veeramani Anandhabalaji
{"title":"A bibliometric exploration of environmental sustainability in supply chain research","authors":"Brintha Rajendran ,&nbsp;Manivannan Babu ,&nbsp;Naliniprava Tripathy ,&nbsp;Veeramani Anandhabalaji","doi":"10.1016/j.sca.2024.100086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study undertakes a bibliometric examination of the literature on supply chain sustainability (SCS). The analysis includes exploring co-authorship, examining keyword co-occurrences, conducting citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, co-citation analysis for performance evaluation, and employing science mapping techniques. The paper thus explores the significant facets of the literature on SCS. We studied the literature on SCS management from 1996 to 2024 and extracted 6898 articles retrieved from the Scopus database. In the preliminary phase, the investigation employs the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow methodology alongside a designated search strategy. Secondly, it employs Biblioshiny, an RStudio package, and VOSviewer. The study finds that the SCS field has evolved with a major focus on collaboration, innovation, and sustainability. Furthermore, the findings indicate that China, the USA, the UK, and India lead in research contributions, emphasizing the importance of international collaboration. Additionally, the findings signpost that technology such as blockchain enhances sustainability efforts. Social sustainability also gains recognition alongside environmental concerns. These findings can inform researchers, highlighting the need for international cooperation, technology integration, and emphasis on social sustainability in advancing the management of supply chains. This study makes novel contributions by providing global coverage of publications, adopting an inclusive approach encompassing case studies and empirical research articles, addressing social desirability bias by reporting positive as well as negative aspects of sustainability in supply chain practices, and identifying alternative areas for future research within the discipline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101186,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Analytics","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949863524000293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study undertakes a bibliometric examination of the literature on supply chain sustainability (SCS). The analysis includes exploring co-authorship, examining keyword co-occurrences, conducting citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, co-citation analysis for performance evaluation, and employing science mapping techniques. The paper thus explores the significant facets of the literature on SCS. We studied the literature on SCS management from 1996 to 2024 and extracted 6898 articles retrieved from the Scopus database. In the preliminary phase, the investigation employs the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow methodology alongside a designated search strategy. Secondly, it employs Biblioshiny, an RStudio package, and VOSviewer. The study finds that the SCS field has evolved with a major focus on collaboration, innovation, and sustainability. Furthermore, the findings indicate that China, the USA, the UK, and India lead in research contributions, emphasizing the importance of international collaboration. Additionally, the findings signpost that technology such as blockchain enhances sustainability efforts. Social sustainability also gains recognition alongside environmental concerns. These findings can inform researchers, highlighting the need for international cooperation, technology integration, and emphasis on social sustainability in advancing the management of supply chains. This study makes novel contributions by providing global coverage of publications, adopting an inclusive approach encompassing case studies and empirical research articles, addressing social desirability bias by reporting positive as well as negative aspects of sustainability in supply chain practices, and identifying alternative areas for future research within the discipline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应链研究中的环境可持续性文献计量学探索
本研究对有关供应链可持续性(SCS)的文献进行了文献计量学研究。分析包括探讨共同作者、研究关键词的共同出现、进行引文分析、书目耦合、用于绩效评估的共同引文分析,以及采用科学图谱技术。因此,本文探讨了 SCS 文献的重要方面。我们研究了 1996 年至 2024 年有关 SCS 管理的文献,并从 Scopus 数据库中提取了 6898 篇文章。在初步阶段,调查采用了 PRISMA(系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目)流程方法和指定的检索策略。其次,它采用了 RStudio 软件包 Biblioshiny 和 VOSviewer。研究发现,SCS 领域的发展主要侧重于合作、创新和可持续性。此外,研究结果表明,中国、美国、英国和印度在研究贡献方面处于领先地位,强调了国际合作的重要性。此外,研究结果还表明,区块链等技术可以加强可持续发展工作。在关注环境问题的同时,社会可持续性也得到了认可。这些发现可以为研究人员提供参考,突出了国际合作、技术整合的必要性,以及在推进供应链管理时对社会可持续性的重视。本研究通过以下方式做出了新的贡献:提供全球范围内的出版物;采用包含案例研究和实证研究文章的包容性方法;通过报告供应链实践中可持续性的积极和消极方面来解决社会可取性偏差问题;以及确定本学科内未来研究的替代领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Integrated Multi-Product Biodiesel and Bioethanol Supply Chain Model with Torrefaction Under Uncertainty An agility and performance assessment framework for supply chains using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling A conceptual digital twin framework for supply chain recovery and resilience A strategic and social analytics model for sustainable packaging in the cosmetic industry A multi-step mixed integer programming heuristic for warehouse layout optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1