Central government Ownership, geographic Distance, and firm Innovation: Evidence from Chinese State-owned enterprises

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115033
Huiying Li , Xinchun Wang , Yu Chang , Nan Zhang , Wei Huang , Quanren Wang
{"title":"Central government Ownership, geographic Distance, and firm Innovation: Evidence from Chinese State-owned enterprises","authors":"Huiying Li ,&nbsp;Xinchun Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Chang ,&nbsp;Nan Zhang ,&nbsp;Wei Huang ,&nbsp;Quanren Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have suggested that state ownership has mixed impacts on SOE’s innovations. We highlight one potential reason for the inconsistency in previous findings by uncovering the heterogeneity within state ownership. Specifically, we suggest that central government ownership provides SOEs with more resources and makes the firms’ strategies closely aligned with the government’s strategic priorities than other state ownership, leading to better innovation performance. However, we demonstrate that this positive effect will diminish as the geographic distance between the SOE and the central government increases due to increased information asymmetry. Our findings suggest that this negative impact of geographic distance might be mitigated by CEOs’ perceptions of the value associated with developing innovations, resulting from their technology human capital and equity ownership. Using data collected from listed Chinese SOEs, we find robust evidence supporting our theory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 115033"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632400537X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that state ownership has mixed impacts on SOE’s innovations. We highlight one potential reason for the inconsistency in previous findings by uncovering the heterogeneity within state ownership. Specifically, we suggest that central government ownership provides SOEs with more resources and makes the firms’ strategies closely aligned with the government’s strategic priorities than other state ownership, leading to better innovation performance. However, we demonstrate that this positive effect will diminish as the geographic distance between the SOE and the central government increases due to increased information asymmetry. Our findings suggest that this negative impact of geographic distance might be mitigated by CEOs’ perceptions of the value associated with developing innovations, resulting from their technology human capital and equity ownership. Using data collected from listed Chinese SOEs, we find robust evidence supporting our theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中央政府所有权、地理距离与企业创新:来自中国国有企业的证据
以往的研究表明,国家所有权对国有企业创新的影响好坏参半。我们通过揭示国有制内部的异质性,强调了以往研究结果不一致的一个潜在原因。具体而言,我们认为中央政府所有制为国有企业提供了更多的资源,使企业的战略与政府的战略重点紧密结合,从而提高了创新绩效。然而,我们证明,随着国有企业与中央政府之间地理距离的增加,这种积极影响会因为信息不对称的加剧而减弱。我们的研究结果表明,首席执行官对技术人力资本和股权所带来的创新发展价值的认识可能会减轻地理距离的负面影响。利用从中国上市国有企业收集的数据,我们发现了支持我们理论的有力证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Content dissimilarity and online review helpfulness: Contextual insights Editorial Board Preventing algorithm aversion: People are willing to use algorithms with a learning label Agility in marketing teams: An analysis of factors influencing the entry decision into a trendy social network Socio-politically silent brands: A double edged sword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1