Numerical analyses of spherical indenter intrusion into sandstone: From laboratory tests to numerical simulations

IF 5.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers and Geotechnics Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106847
Sheng Zhang , Alfonso Rodriguez-Dono , Fei Song , Zilong Zhou
{"title":"Numerical analyses of spherical indenter intrusion into sandstone: From laboratory tests to numerical simulations","authors":"Sheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Alfonso Rodriguez-Dono ,&nbsp;Fei Song ,&nbsp;Zilong Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To explore the mechanical mechanisms of rock fracturing under compression during ball milling. The study investigates the effects of intrusion depth and indenter diameter on the evolution of stresses and plastic strains, integrating laboratory tests and numerical predictions. The results reveal a reduction in both axial and radial stresses with increasing intrusion depth into the rock. Shear stress experiences an initial rise followed by a decline, while circumferential stress demonstrates an initial increase followed by a rapid decrease in the radial direction. As the intrusion deepens, the predominant influence on plastic strain of rock shifts from shear stress dominance to a combined dominance of shear and circumferential stresses. The influence of the indenter diameter on the stress field diminishes following an exponential decay pattern. In terms of the plastic strain field, smaller indenters are more likely to induce plastic failure due to shear and circumferential stresses, larger indenters are more prone to plastic failure induced solely by shear stresses. As the number of indenters increases, the integration of the stress and plastic strain fields is enhanced. This implies that introducing more spherical indenters amplifies the collaborative effect, leading to a more cohesive fracturing of the rock.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55217,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Geotechnics","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 106847"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X24007869","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore the mechanical mechanisms of rock fracturing under compression during ball milling. The study investigates the effects of intrusion depth and indenter diameter on the evolution of stresses and plastic strains, integrating laboratory tests and numerical predictions. The results reveal a reduction in both axial and radial stresses with increasing intrusion depth into the rock. Shear stress experiences an initial rise followed by a decline, while circumferential stress demonstrates an initial increase followed by a rapid decrease in the radial direction. As the intrusion deepens, the predominant influence on plastic strain of rock shifts from shear stress dominance to a combined dominance of shear and circumferential stresses. The influence of the indenter diameter on the stress field diminishes following an exponential decay pattern. In terms of the plastic strain field, smaller indenters are more likely to induce plastic failure due to shear and circumferential stresses, larger indenters are more prone to plastic failure induced solely by shear stresses. As the number of indenters increases, the integration of the stress and plastic strain fields is enhanced. This implies that introducing more spherical indenters amplifies the collaborative effect, leading to a more cohesive fracturing of the rock.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
球形压头侵入砂岩的数值分析:从实验室测试到数值模拟
探索球磨过程中岩石受压破裂的力学机制。研究结合实验室试验和数值预测,探讨了侵入深度和压头直径对应力和塑性应变演变的影响。结果表明,随着侵入岩石深度的增加,轴向和径向应力都会减小。剪应力最初上升,随后下降,而圆周应力最初上升,随后径向应力迅速下降。随着侵入的加深,对岩石塑性应变的主要影响从剪应力为主转变为剪应力和周向应力共同为主。压头直径对应力场的影响按照指数衰减模式逐渐减小。就塑性应变场而言,较小的压头更容易在剪应力和周向应力的作用下引起塑性破坏,而较大的压头则更容易仅在剪应力的作用下引起塑性破坏。随着压头数量的增加,应力场和塑性应变场的整合也会增强。这意味着引入更多的球形压痕会放大协同效应,从而导致岩石更有内聚力的断裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Geotechnics
Computers and Geotechnics 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
15.10%
发文量
438
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The use of computers is firmly established in geotechnical engineering and continues to grow rapidly in both engineering practice and academe. The development of advanced numerical techniques and constitutive modeling, in conjunction with rapid developments in computer hardware, enables problems to be tackled that were unthinkable even a few years ago. Computers and Geotechnics provides an up-to-date reference for engineers and researchers engaged in computer aided analysis and research in geotechnical engineering. The journal is intended for an expeditious dissemination of advanced computer applications across a broad range of geotechnical topics. Contributions on advances in numerical algorithms, computer implementation of new constitutive models and probabilistic methods are especially encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Stability of conical foundations on anisotropic clay: A comprehensive three-dimensional study on V-H-M failure envelopes Effect of the connection mode on the dynamic characteristics of the pile-wheel composite foundation for offshore wind turbines Particle shape distribution effects on the critical strength of granular materials DEM Validation for impact Wave propagation in dry sand: A comparison with experimental results Evaluation of the shear stiffness and load redistribution of framed structures affected by tunnelling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1