The impacts of China's shadow banking regulation on bank lending—An empirical analysis based on textual analysis and machine learning

IF 4.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Pacific-Basin Finance Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102565
Sha Sun , Gong Qian , Jingjing Yu
{"title":"The impacts of China's shadow banking regulation on bank lending—An empirical analysis based on textual analysis and machine learning","authors":"Sha Sun ,&nbsp;Gong Qian ,&nbsp;Jingjing Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China's financial regulatory authority has strengthened shadow banking regulation in recent years, the impact of which has attracted the attention of academics and policymakers. We develop China's shadow banking regulation intensity change index using textual analysis and machine learning methods and explore the impacts of the regulation on bank lending. Using a fixed effect model and a dataset of 177 commercial banks in China from 2007 to 2020, we find that strengthened shadow banking regulation results in shrinkage in bank loan scale and lower loan growth. Mechanism analysis reveals that the asset-reallocation motives and profit-seeking motives generated by banks faced with strengthening regulation lead to a decline in bank lending. The credit tightening effect mainly exists in joint-stock, city, and rural commercial banks while insignificant in state-owned banks. This effect can be moderated by ample capital, abundant deposits, and high loan issuance efficiency. Strengthened regulation also affects loan composition, with an increase in the proportion of corporate lending and a decrease in mortgage lending. Our results have novel implications for both regulators and banks and are robust to several tests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48074,"journal":{"name":"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 102565"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X24003172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China's financial regulatory authority has strengthened shadow banking regulation in recent years, the impact of which has attracted the attention of academics and policymakers. We develop China's shadow banking regulation intensity change index using textual analysis and machine learning methods and explore the impacts of the regulation on bank lending. Using a fixed effect model and a dataset of 177 commercial banks in China from 2007 to 2020, we find that strengthened shadow banking regulation results in shrinkage in bank loan scale and lower loan growth. Mechanism analysis reveals that the asset-reallocation motives and profit-seeking motives generated by banks faced with strengthening regulation lead to a decline in bank lending. The credit tightening effect mainly exists in joint-stock, city, and rural commercial banks while insignificant in state-owned banks. This effect can be moderated by ample capital, abundant deposits, and high loan issuance efficiency. Strengthened regulation also affects loan composition, with an increase in the proportion of corporate lending and a decrease in mortgage lending. Our results have novel implications for both regulators and banks and are robust to several tests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国影子银行监管对银行贷款的影响--基于文本分析和机器学习的实证分析
近年来,中国金融监管部门加强了对影子银行的监管,其影响引起了学术界和政策制定者的关注。我们利用文本分析和机器学习方法编制了中国影子银行监管强度变化指数,并探讨了监管对银行贷款的影响。利用固定效应模型和 2007-2020 年中国 177 家商业银行的数据集,我们发现影子银行监管的加强导致银行贷款规模萎缩和贷款增速下降。机制分析表明,银行在面临监管加强时产生的资产重新配置动机和逐利动机导致银行贷款下降。信贷紧缩效应主要存在于股份制银行、城市商业银行和农村商业银行,而在国有银行中并不显著。资本充足、存款充裕和贷款发放效率高可以缓和这种效应。加强监管也会影响贷款构成,增加公司贷款比例,减少抵押贷款。我们的研究结果对监管机构和银行都有新的启示,而且经多次检验都是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: The Pacific-Basin Finance Journal is aimed at providing a specialized forum for the publication of academic research on capital markets of the Asia-Pacific countries. Primary emphasis will be placed on the highest quality empirical and theoretical research in the following areas: • Market Micro-structure; • Investment and Portfolio Management; • Theories of Market Equilibrium; • Valuation of Financial and Real Assets; • Behavior of Asset Prices in Financial Sectors; • Normative Theory of Financial Management; • Capital Markets of Development; • Market Mechanisms.
期刊最新文献
Spillover effects of MSCI inclusion announcement: Evidence and implications from China Common institutional ownership and opportunistic insider selling: Evidence from China Are pre-opening periods important? Evidence from Chinese market lunch breaks Volatility-managed portfolios in the Chinese equity market Can improving the business environment narrow the within-firm pay gap? Evidence from data on 233 Chinese cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1