Exploring animal enclosures and parasite interactions in Germany

Christopher Sander , Niko Balkenhol , Stephan Neumann
{"title":"Exploring animal enclosures and parasite interactions in Germany","authors":"Christopher Sander ,&nbsp;Niko Balkenhol ,&nbsp;Stephan Neumann","doi":"10.1016/j.ijppaw.2024.101009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In order to gain an initial impression of the current parasite situation in wildlife enclosures across Germany, 17 enclosures of six animal species were examined for parasites in soil and fecal samples in seven facilities. Of particular interest in this context are helminths and protists. Despite the potential risks, however, there are only a few studies on parasites in animal enclosures due to the taboo subject. The study examined 661 fecal samples from fallow deer (<em>Dama dama,</em> N = 247), wild boar (<em>Sus scrofa</em>, N = 207), red deer (<em>Cervus elaphus,</em> N = 111), mouflon (<em>Ovis orientalis musimon</em> N = 76), roe deer (<em>Capreolus capreolus</em>, N = 12) and bison (<em>Bison bonasus</em>, N = 8) as well as 136 soil samples from 12 single-species enclosures and 5 mixed-species enclosures. Three hundred and sixty fecal samples (54.46 %) tested positive for parasites using flotation and sedimentation methods. In addition, parasites were detected in 62.5 % (N = 85) of the soil samples. Examination of the faecal samples revealed that the most common parasite species were <em>Strongyloides</em> sp., <em>Trichostrongylus</em> sp. and <em>Trichuris</em> sp. With the help of a Geographic Information System (GIS), the findings could be displayed on an enclosure map and initial hypotheses on environmental relationships could be made. Particularly high parasite samples were mostly located near feeding and resting areas. The results underline the need for more regular monitoring and targeted parasite management to protect the health of the animals. GIS can be used as an additional tool to help identify hotspots and to specifically incorporate the environment into management in order to take animal-friendly measures. This will play a greater role in the future in the context of anthelmintic resistance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54278,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 101009"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213224424001056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to gain an initial impression of the current parasite situation in wildlife enclosures across Germany, 17 enclosures of six animal species were examined for parasites in soil and fecal samples in seven facilities. Of particular interest in this context are helminths and protists. Despite the potential risks, however, there are only a few studies on parasites in animal enclosures due to the taboo subject. The study examined 661 fecal samples from fallow deer (Dama dama, N = 247), wild boar (Sus scrofa, N = 207), red deer (Cervus elaphus, N = 111), mouflon (Ovis orientalis musimon N = 76), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus, N = 12) and bison (Bison bonasus, N = 8) as well as 136 soil samples from 12 single-species enclosures and 5 mixed-species enclosures. Three hundred and sixty fecal samples (54.46 %) tested positive for parasites using flotation and sedimentation methods. In addition, parasites were detected in 62.5 % (N = 85) of the soil samples. Examination of the faecal samples revealed that the most common parasite species were Strongyloides sp., Trichostrongylus sp. and Trichuris sp. With the help of a Geographic Information System (GIS), the findings could be displayed on an enclosure map and initial hypotheses on environmental relationships could be made. Particularly high parasite samples were mostly located near feeding and resting areas. The results underline the need for more regular monitoring and targeted parasite management to protect the health of the animals. GIS can be used as an additional tool to help identify hotspots and to specifically incorporate the environment into management in order to take animal-friendly measures. This will play a greater role in the future in the context of anthelmintic resistance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索德国动物圈舍与寄生虫的相互作用
为了对德国各地野生动物圈舍中的寄生虫现状有一个初步印象,我们对 7 个设施中 17 个圈舍中 6 种动物的土壤和粪便样本中的寄生虫进行了检测。在这种情况下,蠕虫和原生动物尤其值得关注。然而,尽管存在潜在风险,但由于讳莫如深,有关动物圈舍中寄生虫的研究却寥寥无几。这项研究对 661 份粪便样本进行了检测,样本分别来自母鹿(Dama dama,N = 247)、野猪(Sus scrofa,N = 207)、马鹿(Cervus elaphus,N = 111)、骡子(Ovis orientalis musimon,N = 76)、狍子(Capreolus capreolus,N = 12)和野牛(Bison bonasus,N = 8),以及来自 12 个单一物种圈舍和 5 个混合物种圈舍的 136 份土壤样本。采用浮选和沉淀方法对 360 份粪便样本(54.46%)进行了寄生虫检测,结果呈阳性。此外,62.5%(N = 85)的土壤样本中检测到寄生虫。对粪便样本的检测显示,最常见的寄生虫种类是弓形虫属、三代弓形虫属和毛滴虫属。 在地理信息系统(GIS)的帮助下,检测结果可显示在围栏地图上,并可对环境关系做出初步假设。寄生虫特别多的样本大多位于觅食区和休息区附近。结果表明,有必要进行更多的定期监测和有针对性的寄生虫管理,以保护动物的健康。地理信息系统(GIS)可作为一种辅助工具,帮助确定热点地区,并特别将环境纳入管理,以采取对动物友好的措施。未来,这将在抗蠕虫药抗药性方面发挥更大的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife (IJP-PAW) publishes the results of original research on parasites of all wildlife, invertebrate and vertebrate. This includes free-ranging, wild populations, as well as captive wildlife, semi-domesticated species (e.g. reindeer) and farmed populations of recently domesticated or wild-captured species (e.g. cultured fishes). Articles on all aspects of wildlife parasitology are welcomed including taxonomy, biodiversity and distribution, ecology and epidemiology, population biology and host-parasite relationships. The impact of parasites on the health and conservation of wildlife is seen as an important area covered by the journal especially the potential role of environmental factors, for example climate. Also important to the journal is ''one health'' and the nature of interactions between wildlife, people and domestic animals, including disease emergence and zoonoses.
期刊最新文献
Inactivated Toxoplasma gondii nanovaccine boosts T-cell memory response in a seropositive yellow-footed rock wallaby (Petrogale xanthopus) – A case report from Copenhagen Zoo Effects of individual characteristics and seasonality and their interaction on ectoparasite load of Daurian ground squirrels in Inner Mongolia, China Survey for Babesia spp. in wildlife in the eastern United States Prevalence and local transmission of haemosporidian (Haemosporida) parasites in nestlings of birds of prey (Aves, Accipitriformes) in the temperate forests in Lithuania Endoparasite survey in Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis) under rehabilitation in the Peruvian Amazon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1